Thomas H. Hutchinson

Thomas H. Hutchinson

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Thomas H. Hutchinson

School of Biological Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

38Years (1989-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2001 in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RLReinhard Länge
Reinhard Länge
THThomas H. Hutchinson
Thomas H. Hutchinson
CCCharlotte P. Croudace
Charlotte P. Croudace
FSFred Siegmund
Fred Siegmund
HSHermann Schweinfurth
Hermann Schweinfurth
JSJohn P. Sumpter
John P. Sumpter
A fish full life-cycle (FFLC) study was conducted for 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) using the fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas. Newly fertilized embryos (<24 h old) were exposed to five concentrations of EE2 (0.2, 1.0, 4.0, 16, and 64 ng/L nominal) in continuous flow-through conditions for 305 d at 25 ± 1°C. Exposure concentrations were verified by 14C-EE2 radiochemistry, supported by radioimmunoassay, and mean measured values were ≥70% of nominal. For the F0 adult phase until 301 d posthatch, the no-observed-effect concentrations (NOECs) for growth, survival, and reproduction (as egg production) were all ≥ 1.0 ng/L. The NOEC values for F1 embryo hatching success and larval survival (at 28 d posthatch) were both ≥ 1.0 ng/L. While statistically detectable changes in F1 growth were evident at 0.2 ng/L, these were not considered to be biologically significant when compared with historical control data. Male fish exposed to EE2 at 4.0 ng/L failed to develop normal secondary sexual characteristics; on the other hand, assumed females exposed to this level of EE2 were able to breed when paired with males that had not been exposed to EE2. Histology of F0 control, 0.2-, and 1-ng/L exposed fish at 56 d posthatch indicated an approximate female-to-male (F:M) sex ratio of 50:50 (with no ovatestes observed in the control), while fish exposed to EE2 at 4.0 ng/L for 56 d posthatch had a F: M sex ratio of 84:5 (with ovatestes in 11% of fish). After 172 d posthatch, no testicular tissue was observed in any fish exposed to EE2 at 4.0 ng/L. At the same time point, plasma vitellogenin levels were significantly higher in fish exposed to EE2 at 16 ng/L. A lack of sexual differentiation occurred in males at concentrations ≥4.0 ng/L. Taking into account these data, the overall no-observed-adverse-effect concentration was considered to be 1.0 ng/L.

19 November 2014 in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SGSally Gaw
Sally Gaw
KTKevin V. Thomas
Kevin V. Thomas
THThomas H. Hutchinson
Thomas H. Hutchinson
There has been a significant investment in research to define exposures and potential hazards of pharmaceuticals in freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems. A substantial number of integrated environmental risk assessments have been developed in Europe, North America and many other regions for these situations. In contrast, comparatively few empirical studies have been conducted for human and veterinary pharmaceuticals that are likely to enter coastal and marine ecosystems. This is a critical knowledge gap given the significant increase in coastal human populations around the globe and the growth of coastal megacities, together with the increasing importance of coastal aquaculture around the world. There is increasing evidence that pharmaceuticals are present and are impacting on marine and coastal environments. This paper reviews the sources, impacts and concentrations of pharmaceuticals in marine and coastal environments to identify knowledge gaps and suggests focused case studies as a priority for future research.

12 February 2003 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KTKaren L. Thorpe
Karen L. Thorpe
RCRob I. Cummings
Rob I. Cummings
THThomas H. Hutchinson
Thomas H. Hutchinson
MSMartin Scholze
Martin Scholze
GBGeoff Brighty
Geoff Brighty
CTCharles R. Tyler
Charles R. Tyler

1 April 2004 in Aquatic Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJason R. Snape
Jason R. Snape
SMSteve J. Maund
Steve J. Maund
DPDaniel B. Pickford
Daniel B. Pickford
THThomas H. Hutchinson
Thomas H. Hutchinson

1 April 2006 in Environmental Health Perspectives
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
THThomas H. Hutchinson
Thomas H. Hutchinson
GAGerald T. Ankley
Gerald T. Ankley
HSHelmut Segner
Helmut Segner
CTCharles R. Tyler
Charles R. Tyler
Biomarkers are currently best used as mechanistic “signposts” rather than as “traffic lights” in the environmental risk assessment of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs). In field studies, biomarkers of exposure [e.g., ...

21 August 2008 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DCDaniel J. Caldwell
Daniel J. Caldwell
FMFrank Mastrocco
Frank Mastrocco
THThomas H. Hutchinson
Thomas H. Hutchinson
RLReinhard Länge
Reinhard Länge
DHDagobert Heijerick
Dagobert Heijerick
JSJohn P. Sumpter
John P. Sumpter
17α-Ethinyl estradiol (EE2) is a synthetic estrogen widely used in combination with other steroid hormones in oral contraceptives and in the contraceptive patch. EE2 has been detected in sewage treatment plant effluents in the low nanogram -per-liter range and occasionally in surface waters in the U.S., U.K., Canada, Brazil, Germany, and elsewhere. The mode of action is receptor-mediated, and estrogen receptors exist in mammals and other vertebrates. A large number of studies on the effects of EE2 on aquatic organisms exist. One hundred English language studies published between 1994 and 2007, one as yet unpublished study, and findings published in conference proceedings (in German) were compared to published data quality criteria to identify the most relevant studies for deriving a predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC). Reproduction in fish was identified as the most sensitive end point in aquatic species. A species sensitivity distribution was constructed using no observed effect concentrations (NOECs) for reproductive effects from 39 papers in 26 species, resulting in a median hazardous concentration at which 5% of the species tested are affected (HC5,50) of 0.35 ng/L. After comparing this HC5,50 to all of the laboratory and field-derived toxicity information available for EE2, we recommend using 0.35 ng/L as the PNEC for EE2 in surface water. This PNEC is below 95% of the existing NOECs for effects on reproduction and is also below virtually all of the NOECs for vitellogenin induction in the key fish reproduction studies.