Ravi Koppolu

Ravi Koppolu

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Ravi Koppolu

Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben Germany

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 December 2008 in Theoretical and Applied Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Rajeev VarshneyRajeev Varshney
Rajeev Varshney
DBD. J. Bertioli
D. J. Bertioli
MMM. C. Moretzsohn
M. C. Moretzsohn
VVV. Vadez
V. Vadez
LKL. Krishnamurthy
L. Krishnamurthy
DHD. A. Hoisington
D. A. Hoisington
Molecular markers and genetic linkage maps are pre-requisites for molecular breeding in any crop species. In case of peanut or groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.), an amphidiploid (4X) species, not a single genetic map is, however, available based on a mapping population derived from cultivated genotypes. In order to develop a genetic linkage map for tetraploid cultivated groundnut, a total of 1,145 microsatellite or simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers available in public domain as well as unpublished markers from several sources were screened on two genotypes, TAG 24 and ICGV 86031 that are parents of a recombinant inbred line mapping population. As a result, 144 (12.6%) polymorphic markers were identified and these amplified a total of 150 loci. A total of 135 SSR loci could be mapped into 22 linkage groups (LGs). While six LGs had only two SSR loci, the other LGs contained 3 (LG_AhXV) to 15 (LG_AhVIII) loci. As the mapping population used for developing the genetic map segregates for drought tolerance traits, phenotyping data obtained for transpiration, transpiration efficiency, specific leaf area and SPAD chlorophyll meter reading (SCMR) for 2 years were analyzed together with genotyping data. Although, 2–5 QTLs for each trait mentioned above were identified, the phenotypic variation explained by these QTLs was in the range of 3.5–14.1%. In addition, alignment of two linkage groups (LGs) (LG_AhIII and LG_AhVI) of the developed genetic map was shown with available genetic maps of AA diploid genome of groundnut and Lotus and Medicago. The present study reports the construction of the first genetic map for cultivated groundnut and demonstrates its utility for molecular mapping of QTLs controlling drought tolerance related traits as well as establishing relationships with diploid AA genome of groundnut and model legume genome species. Therefore, the map should be useful for the community for a variety of applications.

30 December 2010 in Theoretical and Applied Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KRK. Ravi
K. Ravi
VVV. Vadez
V. Vadez
SIS. Isobe
S. Isobe
RMReyazul Rouf Mir
Reyazul Rouf Mir
YGY. Guo
Y. Guo
Rajeev VarshneyRajeev Varshney
Rajeev Varshney
Cultivated groundnut or peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.), an allotetraploid (2n = 4x = 40), is a self pollinated and widely grown crop in the semi-arid regions of the world. Improvement of drought tolerance is an important area of research for groundnut breeding programmes. Therefore, for the identification of candidate QTLs for drought tolerance, a comprehensive and refined genetic map containing 191 SSR loci based on a single mapping population (TAG 24 × ICGV 86031), segregating for drought and surrogate traits was developed. Genotyping data and phenotyping data collected for more than ten drought related traits in 2–3 seasons were analyzed in detail for identification of main effect QTLs (M-QTLs) and epistatic QTLs (E-QTLs) using QTL Cartographer, QTLNetwork and Genotype Matrix Mapping (GMM) programmes. A total of 105 M-QTLs with 3.48–33.36% phenotypic variation explained (PVE) were identified using QTL Cartographer, while only 65 M-QTLs with 1.3–15.01% PVE were identified using QTLNetwork. A total of 53 M-QTLs were such which were identified using both programmes. On the other hand, GMM identified 186 (8.54–44.72% PVE) and 63 (7.11–21.13% PVE), three and two loci interactions, whereas only 8 E-QTL interactions with 1.7–8.34% PVE were identified through QTLNetwork. Interestingly a number of co-localized QTLs controlling 2–9 traits were also identified. The identification of few major, many minor M-QTLs and QTL × QTL interactions during the present study confirmed the complex and quantitative nature of drought tolerance in groundnut. This study suggests deployment of modern approaches like marker-assisted recurrent selection or genomic selection instead of marker-assisted backcrossing approach for breeding for drought tolerance in groundnut.

13 November 2024 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MJMurukarthick Jayakodi
Murukarthick Jayakodi
QLQiongxian Lu
Qiongxian Lu
HPHélène Pidon
Hélène Pidon
MRM. Timothy Rabanus-Wallace
M. Timothy Rabanus-Wallace
MBMicha Bayer
Micha Bayer
NSNils Stein
Nils Stein
Pangenomes are collections of annotated genome sequences of multiple individuals of a species1. The structural variants uncovered by these datasets are a major asset to genetic analysis in crop plants2. Here we report a pangenome of barley comprising long-read sequence assemblies of 76 wild and domesticated genomes and short-read sequence data of 1,315 genotypes. An expanded catalogue of sequence variation in the crop includes structurally complex loci that are rich in gene copy number variation. To demonstrate the utility of the pangenome, we focus on four loci involved in disease resistance, plant architecture, nutrient release and trichome development. Novel allelic variation at a powdery mildew resistance locus and population-specific copy number gains in a regulator of vegetative branching were found. Expansion of a family of starch-cleaving enzymes in elite malting barleys was linked to shifts in enzymatic activity in micro-malting trials. Deletion of an enhancer motif is likely to change the developmental trajectory of the hairy appendages on barley grains. Our findings indicate that allelic diversity at structurally complex loci may have helped crop plants to adapt to new selective regimes in agricultural ecosystems.

22 July 2013 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RKRavi Koppolu
Ravi Koppolu
NANadia Anwar
Nadia Anwar
SSShun Sakuma
Shun Sakuma
ATAkemi Tagiri
Akemi Tagiri
ULUdda Lundqvist
Udda Lundqvist
TSThorsten Schnurbusch
Thorsten Schnurbusch
Inflorescence architecture of barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) is common among the Triticeae species, which bear one to three single-flowered spikelets at each rachis internode. Triple spikelet meristem is one of the unique features of barley spikes, in which three spikelets (one central and two lateral spikelets) are produced at each rachis internode. Fertility of the lateral spikelets at triple spikelet meristem gives row-type identity to barley spikes. Six-rowed spikes show fertile lateral spikelets and produce increased grain yield per spike, compared with two-rowed spikes with sterile lateral spikelets. Thus, far, two loci governing the row-type phenotype were isolated in barley that include Six-rowed spike1 ( Vrs1 ) and Intermedium-C . In the present study, we isolated Six-rowed spike4 ( Vrs4 ), a barley ortholog of the maize ( Zea mays L.) inflorescence architecture gene RAMOSA2 ( RA2 ). Eighteen coding mutations in barley RA2 ( HvRA2 ) were specifically associated with lateral spikelet fertility and loss of spikelet determinacy. Expression analyses through mRNA in situ hybridization and microarray showed that Vrs4 ( HvRA2 ) controls the row-type pathway through Vrs1 ( HvHox1 ), a negative regulator of lateral spikelet fertility in barley. Moreover, Vrs4 may also regulate transcripts of barley SISTER OF RAMOSA3 ( HvSRA ), a putative trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase involved in trehalose-6-phosphate homeostasis implicated to control spikelet determinacy. Our expression data illustrated that, although RA2 is conserved among different grass species, its down-stream target genes appear to be modified in barley and possibly other species of tribe Triticeae.

7 July 2015 in Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NPNaser Poursarebani
Naser Poursarebani
TSTina Seidensticker
Tina Seidensticker
RKRavi Koppolu
Ravi Koppolu
CTCorinna Trautewig
Corinna Trautewig
PGPiotr Gawroński
Piotr Gawroński
TSThorsten Schnurbusch
Thorsten Schnurbusch
Inflorescences of the tribe Triticeae, which includes wheat (Triticum sp. L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) are characterized by sessile spikelets directly borne on the main axis, thus forming a branchless spike. ‘Compositum-Barley’ and tetraploid ‘Miracle-Wheat’ (T. turgidum convar. compositum (L.f.) Filat.) display noncanonical spike-branching in which spikelets are replaced by lateral branch-like structures resembling small-sized secondary spikes. As a result of this branch formation ‘Miracle-Wheat’ produces significantly more grains per spike, leading to higher spike yield. In this study, we first isolated the gene underlying spike-branching in ‘Compositum-Barley,’ i.e., compositum 2 (com2). Moreover, we found that COM2 is orthologous to the branched headt (bht) locus regulating spike branching in tetraploid ‘Miracle-Wheat.’ Both genes possess orthologs with similar functions in maize BRANCHED SILKLESS 1 (BD1) and rice FRIZZY PANICLE/BRANCHED FLORETLESS 1 (FZP/BFL1) encoding AP2/ERF transcription factors. Sequence analysis of the bht locus in a collection of mutant and wild-type tetraploid wheat accessions revealed that a single amino acid substitution in the DNA-binding domain gave rise to the domestication of ‘Miracle-Wheat.’ mRNA in situ hybridization, microarray experiments, and independent qRT-PCR validation analyses revealed that the branch repression pathway in barley is governed through the spike architecture gene Six-rowed spike 4 regulating COM2 expression, while HvIDS1 (barley ortholog of maize INDETERMINATE SPIKELET 1) is a putative downstream target of COM2. These findings presented here provide new insights into the genetic basis of spike architecture in Triticeae, and have disclosed new targets for genetic manipulations aiming at boosting wheat’s yield potential.

14 November 2016 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HYHelmy M. Youssef
Helmy M. Youssef
KEKai Eggert
Kai Eggert
RKRavi Koppolu
Ravi Koppolu
AAAhmad M. Alqudah
Ahmad M. Alqudah
NPNaser Poursarebani
Naser Poursarebani
TSThorsten Schnurbusch
Thorsten Schnurbusch