Prasanth Penumadu

Prasanth Penumadu

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Prasanth Penumadu

Department of Surgical Oncology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 January 2014 in Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PPPrasanth Penumadu
Prasanth Penumadu
SBSavio G. Barreto
Savio G. Barreto
MGMahesh Goel
Mahesh Goel
SSShailesh V. Shrikhande
Shailesh V. Shrikhande


1 January 2023 in JCO Global Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
STShivakumar Thiagarajan
Shivakumar Thiagarajan
VPVinisha Poojari
Vinisha Poojari
VTVidisha Tuljapurkar
Vidisha Tuljapurkar
SGSarbani Ghosh-Laskar
Sarbani Ghosh-Laskar
KFKhuzema Fatehi
Khuzema Fatehi
CPC.S. Pramesh
C.S. Pramesh
PURPOSE: Virtual tumor board (VTB) via videoconference facility involving multiple specialists in the decision making for various tumors is well accepted, especially in high-income countries. Information on virtual tumor boards for head and neck cancers especially from low- and middle-income countries is sparse. In this study, we have audited the findings of the National Cancer Grid VTBs performed for head and neck cancers.METHODS: All patients discussed in the head and neck VTBs at our center between December 2016 and February 2022 were included in the study. Details such as the type of institute sending patients for discussion, its location, subsites within the head and neck region, histopathology, treatment setting or question for the VTB, and availability of guidelines for such patient scenarios were assessed. Also, a survey was sent to assess the usefulness of the VTBs.RESULTS: A total of 208 patients were discussed in 54 VTB sessions. The most common head and neck sites discussed in the VTBs were the oral cavity (n = 64, 30.7%) followed by skull base/nose and paranasal sinuses/eyelid-orbit tumors (n = 49, 23.5%). Nonsquamous cell carcinoma was the most common histopathology discussed; recurrent cancers/residual diseases were the most common treatment settings (n = 134, 64.4%) for which there were no existing guidelines. Survey results showed that most VTB decisions were implementable, and respondents felt that VTBs were a useful educational tool as well.CONCLUSION: Our study affirms the feasibility of VTBs in low- and middle-income countries' health care systems for managing uncommon malignancies and clinical situations, which act as an important educational platform.

15 January 2019 in Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAshwani Kumar Sachdeva
Ashwani Kumar Sachdeva
PPPrasanth Penumadu
Prasanth Penumadu
PKPavneet Kohli
Pavneet Kohli
BDBiswajit Dubashi
Biswajit Dubashi
HMHemachandren Munuswamy
Hemachandren Munuswamy
Background: Growing teratoma syndrome is a rare phenomenon seen in nonseminomatous germ cell tumors after chemotherapy, where the tumor grows paradoxically despite normalization of tumor markers. It has been found in various locations, most commonly, the retroperitoneum in association with metastatic disease. The occurrence of growing teratoma syndrome in a mediastinal primary is very rare and there are only a few reports in the literature. Methods: In a retrospective review, out of 12 patients with mediastinal involvement by a germ cell tumor, 5 had a primary from the mediastinum. We present a series of 3 cases of primary germ cell tumor of the mediastinum, which after chemotherapy, fulfilled the criteria for growing teratoma syndrome and were managed with surgical excision. Conclusion: Development of growing teratoma syndrome in a primary mediastinal germ cell tumor is extremely rare. Its awareness and early detection can lead to successful surgical excision and long-term cure.

1 December 2019 in Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SGSivaraman Ganesan
Sivaraman Ganesan
MTMahalakshmi Thulasingam
Mahalakshmi Thulasingam
KGK Gunaseelan
K Gunaseelan
RKR Kalaiarasi
R Kalaiarasi
PPPrasanth Penumadu
Prasanth Penumadu
SRSimon N Rogers
Simon N Rogers
Background: Quality of life is an important outcome measure used both in research and patient care across all cultural healthcare settings. Objective: This study is aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of interviewer-administered Tamil translated University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (Version 4) in a setting with low literacy. Methods: The study was done in a tertiary care teaching institute in Puducherry, South India. The translation was done by using ‘forward-backward translation method.’ A hundred subjects diagnosed with head and neck cancer (HNC) were interviewed before the initiation of treatment. The Tamil version of University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UWQOL) questionnaire was validated using the Tamil version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-Brief questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF) version. Inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability was also assessed. Item-total correlation and Cronbach alpha were calculated for assessing validity and internal consistency respectively. Results: In the Tamil version of UWQOL, social-emotional subscale was more affected than physical subscale. The domains such as mood, anxiety, and pain were most affected. The subscale scores were significantly different between those with early and late cancer. Tamil version of UWQOL showed moderate correlation with WHOQOL-BREF. The Tamil version of UWQOL had good test-retest and inter-rater agreement. Item-total correlation for the subscales was >0.80. The internal consistency of the Tamil Questionnaire was acceptable with Cronbach Alpha of 0.69. Conclusion: The Tamil version of UWQOL questionnaire is a short, valid and reliable for HNC patients of low literacy. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention (APJCP)

9 October 2018 in International Journal of Hyperthermia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ABAditi BHATT
Aditi BHATT
SMSanket S. Mehta
Sanket S. Mehta
SZShabber Zaveri
Shabber Zaveri
FRFiroz Rajan
Firoz Rajan
MRMukurdipi Ray
Mukurdipi Ray
RSRamakrishnan Seshadri
Ramakrishnan Seshadri
Background: The Indian HIPEC registry is a self-funded registry instituted by a group of Indian surgeons for patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) undergoing surgical treatment. This work was performed to • Evaluate outcomes of cytoreductive surgery ± HIPEC in patients enrolled in the registry. • Identify operational problems. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients enrolled in the registry from March 2016 to September 2017 was performed. An online survey was performed to study the surgeons’ attitudes and existing practices pertaining to the registry and identify operational problems. Results: During the study period, 332 patients were enrolled in 8 participating centres. The common indication was ovarian cancer for three centres and pseudomyxoma peritonei for three others. The median PCI ranged from 3 to 23. A CC-0/1 resection was obtained in 94.7%. There was no significant difference in the morbidity (p = .25) and mortality (p = .19) rates between different centres. There was a high rate of failure-to-rescue (19.3%) patients with complications and the survival in patients with colorectal PM was inferior. A lack of dedicated personnel for data collection and entry was the main reason for only 10/43 surgeons contributing data. The other problem was the lack of complete electronic medical record systems at all centres. Conclusions: These results validate existing practices and identify country-specific problems that need to be addressed. Despite operational problems, the registry is an invaluable tool for audit and research. It shows the feasibility of fruitful collaboration between surgeons in the absence of any regulatory body or funding for the project.