Laurie Gaspar

Laurie Gaspar

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Laurie Gaspar

University of Colorado

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 July 2014 in Radiation Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CNCarsten Nieder
Carsten Nieder
AGAnca-Ligia Grosu
Anca-Ligia Grosu
LGLaurie E Gaspar
Laurie E Gaspar
In many patients with brain metastases, the primary therapeutic aim is symptom palliation and maintenance of neurologic function, but in a subgroup, long-term survival is possible. Local control in the brain, and absent or controlled extracranial sites of disease are prerequisites for favorable survival. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a focal, highly precise treatment option with a long track record. Its clinical development and implementation by several pioneering institutions eventually rendered possible cooperative group randomized trials. A systematic review of those studies and other landmark studies was undertaken. Most clinicians are aware of the potential benefits of SRS such as a short treatment time, a high probability of treated-lesion control and, when adhering to typical dose/volume recommendations, a low normal tissue complication probability. However, SRS as sole first-line treatment carries a risk of failure in non-treated brain regions, which has resulted in controversy around when to add whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). SRS might also be prescribed as salvage treatment in patients relapsing despite previous SRS and/or WBRT. An optimal balance between intracranial control and side effects requires continued research efforts.

1 March 2012 in Clinical Lung Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LGLaurie E. Gaspar
Laurie E. Gaspar
EMErica J. McNamara
Erica J. McNamara
EGE. Greer Gay
E. Greer Gay
JPJoe B. Putnam
Joe B. Putnam
JCJeffrey Crawford
Jeffrey Crawford
JBJames A. Bonner
James A. Bonner

19 September 2014 in Radiation Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAArya Amini
Arya Amini
NYNorman Yeh
Norman Yeh
LGLaurie E Gaspar
Laurie E Gaspar
BKBrian Kavanagh
Brian Kavanagh
SKSana D. Karam
Sana D. Karam
Lung cancer continues to be one of the most prevalent malignancies worldwide and is the leading cause of death in both men and women. Presently, local control rates are quite poor. Improvements in imaging and radiation treatment delivery systems however have provided radiation oncologists with new tools to better target these tumors. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is one such technique that has shown efficacy as upfront treatment for lung cancer. In addition, more recent studies have demonstrated some effectiveness in recurrent tumors in prior irradiated fields as well. This review summarizes seven recent studies of re-irradiation with SBRT in patients with thoracic recurrences treated previously with conventionally fractionated radiation therapy. Combined, 140 patients were included. The median initial thoracic radiation doses ranged from 50-87.5 Gy and median re-irradiation dose ranged from 40-80 Gy. Local control rates varied from 65-92%. Re-irradiation was well tolerated with few grade 4 and 5 complications (observed in one study). Currently, based on these published reports, re-irradiation with SBRT appears feasible for in-field thoracic recurrences, though caution must be taken in all cases of retreatment.

1 January 2011 in Practical Radiation Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JWJulie A. Weintraub
Julie A. Weintraub
JBJeffrey Bennett
Jeffrey Bennett
LGLaurie E. Gaspar
Laurie E. Gaspar

1 November 2018 in Clinical Lung Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TRTyler P. Robin
Tyler P. Robin
TSTimothy S. Sannes
Timothy S. Sannes
FKFeng-Ming Kong
Feng-Ming Kong
FMFrancoise Mornex
Francoise Mornex
FHFred R. Hirsch
Fred R. Hirsch
LGLaurie E. Gaspar
Laurie E. Gaspar

25 April 2018 in Patient Experience Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LGLaurie E Gaspar
Laurie E Gaspar
HWHoward J West
Howard J West
BABonnie J Addario
Bonnie J Addario
DCD Ross Camidge
D Ross Camidge
A survey (via SurveyMonkey) was sent to lung cancer patients, their caregivers or significant others asking about their experience in making difficult treatment decisions. Of the 198 respondents, 118 (69%) indicated that they had faced a difficult decision with respect to their lung cancer treatment. Of those, 73% indicated that they would have desired that the decision be made with their physician using a shared decision-making process, and 58% perceived that such a process had occurred. In addition, only 23% of respondents indicated that they had had the right amount of information when making the decision. Fortunately, only 9% of respondents expressed regret regarding the decision they ultimately made. A Patient Decision Aid (PDA) was made available to the respondents to view, and opinions were sought regarding the usefulness of this type of format for presenting information. This format was perceived as helpful, unsure if helpful, or not helpful by 62%, 36%, and 2% of respondents, respectively. In summary, the majority of lung cancer patients want to make difficult decisions using a shared decision-making process. The patient perception is that this is not occurring often enough. Even in this fairly well-educated group of respondents, many report that they are not sure that they have all the information necessary to make that difficult decision. Physicians may need help developing their communication and shared decision-making skills. Introducing PDAs into the oncology clinic may represent a way to present complex information and improve the patient experience.