Tamsin Edwards

Tamsin Edwards

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Tamsin Edwards

Department of Geography, King’s College London, UK

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 May 2021 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TETamsin L. Edwards
Tamsin L. Edwards
SNSophie Nowicki
Sophie Nowicki
BMBen Marzeion
Ben Marzeion
RHRegine Hock
Regine Hock
HGHeiko Goelzer
Heiko Goelzer
TZThomas Zwinger
Thomas Zwinger

6 February 2019 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NGNicholas R. Golledge
Nicholas R. Golledge
EKElizabeth Keller
Elizabeth Keller
NGNatalya Gomez
Natalya Gomez
KNKaitlin A. Naughten
Kaitlin A. Naughten
JBJorge Bernales
Jorge Bernales
TETamsin L. Edwards
Tamsin L. Edwards

17 September 2020 in The Cryosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HGHeiko Goelzer
Heiko Goelzer
SNSophie Nowicki
Sophie Nowicki
APAnthony Payne
Anthony Payne
ELEric Larour
Eric Larour
HSHelene Seroussi
Helene Seroussi
MBMichiel Van den Broeke
Michiel Van den Broeke
The Greenland ice sheet is one of the largest contributors to global mean sea-level rise today and is expected to continue to lose mass as the Arctic continues to warm. The two predominant mass loss mechanisms are increased surface meltwater run-off and mass loss associated with the retreat of marine-terminating outlet glaciers. In this paper we use a large ensemble of Greenland ice sheet models forced by output from a representative subset of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) global climate models to project ice sheet changes and sea-level rise contributions over the 21st century. The simulations are part of the Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project for CMIP6 (ISMIP6). We estimate the sea-level contribution together with uncertainties due to future climate forcing, ice sheet model formulations and ocean forcing for the two greenhouse gas concentration scenarios RCP8.5 and RCP2.6. The results indicate that the Greenland ice sheet will continue to lose mass in both scenarios until 2100, with contributions of 90±50 and 32±17 mm to sea-level rise for RCP8.5 and RCP2.6, respectively. The largest mass loss is expected from the south-west of Greenland, which is governed by surface mass balance changes, continuing what is already observed today. Because the contributions are calculated against an unforced control experiment, these numbers do not include any committed mass loss, i.e. mass loss that would occur over the coming century if the climate forcing remained constant. Under RCP8.5 forcing, ice sheet model uncertainty explains an ensemble spread of 40 mm, while climate model uncertainty and ocean forcing uncertainty account for a spread of 36 and 19 mm, respectively. Apart from those formally derived uncertainty ranges, the largest gap in our knowledge is about the physical understanding and implementation of the calving process, i.e. the interaction of the ice sheet with the ocean.

18 November 2015 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CRCatherine Ritz
Catherine Ritz
TETamsin L. Edwards
Tamsin L. Edwards
GDGaël Durand
Gaël Durand
APAntony J. Payne
Antony J. Payne
VPVincent Peyaud
Vincent Peyaud
RHRichard Hindmarsh
Richard Hindmarsh

6 February 2019 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TETamsin L. Edwards
Tamsin L. Edwards
MBMark A. Brandon
Mark A. Brandon
GDGael Durand
Gael Durand
NENeil R. Edwards
Neil R. Edwards
NGNicholas R. Golledge
Nicholas R. Golledge
AWAndreas Wernecke
Andreas Wernecke
Predictions for sea-level rise this century due to melt from Antarctica range from zero to more than one metre. The highest predictions are driven by the controversial marine ice-cliff instability (MICI) hypothesis, which assumes that coastal ice cliffs can rapidly collapse after ice shelves disintegrate, as a result of surface and sub-shelf melting caused by global warming. But MICI has not been observed in the modern era and it remains unclear whether it is required to reproduce sea-level variations in the geological past. Here we quantify ice-sheet modelling uncertainties for the original MICI study and show that the probability distributions are skewed towards lower values (under very high greenhouse gas concentrations, the most likely value is 45 centimetres). However, MICI is not required to reproduce sea-level changes due to Antarctic ice loss in the mid-Pliocene epoch, the last interglacial period or 1992-2017; without it we find that the projections agree with previous studies (all 95th percentiles are less than 43 centimetres). We conclude that previous interpretations of these MICI projections over-estimate sea-level rise this century; because the MICI hypothesis is not well constrained, confidence in projections with MICI would require a greater range of observationally constrained models of ice-shelf vulnerability and ice-cliff collapse.

8 May 2013 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FNFaezeh M. Nick
Faezeh M. Nick
AVAndreas Vieli
Andreas Vieli
MAMorten Langer Andersen
Morten Langer Andersen
IJIan Joughin
Ian Joughin
APAntony Payne
Antony Payne
RWRoderik S. W. van de Wal
Roderik S. W. van de Wal