David C. Atkins

David C. Atkins

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

David C. Atkins

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2006 in Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SDSona Dimidjian
Sona Dimidjian
SHSteven D. Hollon
Steven D. Hollon
KDKeith S. Dobson
Keith S. Dobson
KSKaren B. Schmaling
Karen B. Schmaling
RKRobert J. Kohlenberg
Robert J. Kohlenberg
NJNeil S. Jacobson
Neil S. Jacobson
Antidepressant medication is considered the current standard for severe depression, and cognitive therapy is the most widely investigated psychosocial treatment for depression. However, not all patients want to take medication, and cognitive therapy has not demonstrated consistent efficacy across trials. Moreover, dismantling designs have suggested that behavioral components may account for the efficacy of cognitive therapy. The present study tested the efficacy of behavioral activation by comparing it with cognitive therapy and antidepressant medication in a randomized placebo-controlled design in adults with major depressive disorder (N = 241). In addition, it examined the importance of initial severity as a moderator of treatment outcome. Among more severely depressed patients, behavioral activation was comparable to antidepressant medication, and both significantly outperformed cognitive therapy. The implications of these findings for the evaluation of current treatment guidelines and dissemination are discussed.

1 April 2009 in JAMA
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MLMary E. Larimer
Mary E. Larimer
DMDaniel K. Malone
Daniel K. Malone
MGMichelle D. Garner
Michelle D. Garner
DADavid C. Atkins
David C. Atkins
BBBonnie Burlingham
Bonnie Burlingham
GMG. Alan Marlatt
G. Alan Marlatt
Research from JAMA — Health Care and Public Service Use and Costs Before and After Provision of Housing for Chronically Homeless Persons With Severe Alcohol Problems

1 January 2007 in Journal of Family Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DADavid C. Atkins
David C. Atkins
RGRobert J. Gallop
Robert J. Gallop
Marital and family researchers often study infrequent behaviors. These powerful psychological variables, such as abuse, criticism, and drug use, have important ramifications for families and society as well as for the statistical models used to study them. Most researchers continue to rely on ordinary least-squares (OLS) regression for these types of data, but estimates and inferences from OLS regression can be seriously biased for count data such as these. This article presents a tutorial on statistical methods for positively skewed event data, including Poisson, negative binomial, zero-inflated Poisson, and zero-inflated negative binomial regression models. These statistical methods are introduced through a marital commitment example, and the data and computer code to run the example analyses in R, SAS, SPSS, and Mplus are included in the online supplemental material. Extensions and practical advice are given to assist researchers in using these tools with their data.

20 December 2016 in Journal of Medical Internet Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PAPatricia A Arean
Patricia A Arean
KHKevin A Hallgren
Kevin A Hallgren
JJJoshua T Jordan
Joshua T Jordan
AGAdam Gazzaley
Adam Gazzaley
DADavid C Atkins
David C Atkins
JAJoaquin A Anguera
Joaquin A Anguera
Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet

1 January 2013 in Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DADavid C. Atkins
David C. Atkins
SBScott A. Baldwin
Scott A. Baldwin
CZCheng Zheng
Cheng Zheng
RGRobert J. Gallop
Robert J. Gallop
CNClayton Neighbors
Clayton Neighbors
Critical research questions in the study of addictive behaviors concern how these behaviors change over time: either as the result of intervention or in naturalistic settings. The combination of count outcomes that are often strongly skewed with many zeroes (e.g., days using, number of total drinks, number of drinking consequences) with repeated assessments (e.g., longitudinal follow-up after intervention or daily diary data) present challenges for data analyses. The current article provides a tutorial on methods for analyzing longitudinal substance use data, focusing on Poisson, zero-inflated, and hurdle mixed models, which are types of hierarchical or multilevel models. Two example datasets are used throughout, focusing on drinking-related consequences following an intervention and daily drinking over the past 30 days, respectively. Both datasets as well as R, SAS, Mplus, Stata, and SPSS code showing how to fit the models are available on a supplemental website.

1 January 2004 in Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ACAndrew Christensen
Andrew Christensen
DADavid C. Atkins
David C. Atkins
SBSara Berns
Sara Berns
JWJennifer Wheeler
Jennifer Wheeler
DBDonald H. Baucom
Donald H. Baucom
LSLorelei E. Simpson
Lorelei E. Simpson
A randomized clinical trial compared the effects of traditional behavioral couple therapy (TBCT) and integrative behavioral couple therapy (IBCT) on 134 seriously and chronically distressed married couples, stratified into moderately and severely distressed groups. Couples in IBCT made steady improvements in satisfaction throughout the course of treatment, whereas TBCT couples improved more quickly than IBCT couples early in treatment but then, in contrast to the IBCT group, plateaued later in treatment. Both treatments produced similar levels of clinically significant improvement by the end of treatment (71% of IBCT couples and 59% of TBCT couples were reliably improved or recovered on the Dyadic Adjustment Scale; G. B. Spanier, 1976). Measures of communication also showed improvement for both groups. Measures of individual functioning improved as marital satisfaction improved.