Margaret M. Lamont

Margaret M. Lamont

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Margaret M. Lamont

US Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, Gainesville, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 February 2021 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MOMichael J. Osland
Michael J. Osland
PSPhilip W. Stevens
Philip W. Stevens
MLMargaret M. Lamont
Margaret M. Lamont
RBRichard C. Brusca
Richard C. Brusca
KHKristen Hart
Kristen Hart
JSJeffrey A. Seminoff
Jeffrey A. Seminoff

2 November 2015 in Animal Biotelemetry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MLMargaret M. Lamont
Margaret M. Lamont
IFIkuko Fujisaki
Ikuko Fujisaki
BSBrail S. Stephens
Brail S. Stephens
CHCaitlin Hackett
Caitlin Hackett
For imperiled marine turtles, use of satellite telemetry has proven to be an effective method in determining long distance movements. However, the large size of the tag, relatively high cost and low spatial resolution of this method make it more difficult to examine fine-scale movements of individuals, particularly at foraging grounds where animals are frequently submerged. Acoustic telemetry offers a more suitable method of assessing fine-scale movement patterns with a smaller tag that provides more precise locations. We used acoustic telemetry to define home ranges and describe habitat use of juvenile green turtles at a temperate foraging ground in the northern Gulf of Mexico. We outfitted eight juvenile green turtles with acoustic transmitters and tracked them from 14 to 138 days from September 2012 to February 2013 in St. Joseph Bay, Northwest Florida. Mean home range size was relatively small compared to other studies. For four turtles, we observed a moderate inverse relationship between water temperature and water depth which is consistent with the idea that turtles moved to deeper waters when temperatures cooled. On average distance to the channel from turtle locations were different by bottom cover type. These turtles appear to forage in shallow-water seagrass beds that border deep channels. When water temperatures dropped in winter, some of the tracked turtles moved to a deep-water channel on the western side of the study site. Turtles whose foraging sites were farther from the deep-water channel exhibited greater displacement than those with sites that were closer to the channel. Green turtles in St. Joseph Bay have relatively small home ranges and many contain multiple activity centers. The frequent use of channels by turtles suggests bathymetry plays a major role in habitat selection of juvenile green turtles, particularly as temperatures drop in winter. The quality and density of seagrass habitat in St. Joseph Bay and its proximity to deep channels appears to provide ideal conditions for juvenile greens. The results of this study help define characteristics of foraging habitat utilized by juvenile greens in the northern Gulf of Mexico that managers can use in creating protected areas such as aquatic preserves.

9 May 2023 in Estuaries and Coasts
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RBRémi Bardou
Rémi Bardou
MOMichael J. Osland
Michael J. Osland
Steven ScyphersSteven Scyphers
Steven Scyphers
CSChristine Shepard
Christine Shepard
KAKaren E. Aerni
Karen E. Aerni
AHA. Randall Hughes
A. Randall Hughes
Climate change is altering species’ range limits and transforming ecosystems. For example, warming temperatures are leading to the range expansion of tropical, cold-sensitive species at the expense of their cold-tolerant counterparts. In some temperate and subtropical coastal wetlands, warming winters are enabling mangrove forest encroachment into salt marsh, which is a major regime shift that has significant ecological and societal ramifications. Here, we synthesized existing data and expert knowledge to assess the distribution of mangroves near rapidly changing range limits in the southeastern USA. We used expert elicitation to identify data limitations and highlight knowledge gaps for advancing understanding of past, current, and future range dynamics. Mangroves near poleward range limits are often shorter, wider, and more shrublike compared to their tropical counterparts that grow as tall forests in freeze-free, resource-rich environments. The northern range limits of mangroves in the southeastern USA are particularly dynamic and climate sensitive due to abundance of suitable coastal wetland habitat and the exposure of mangroves to winter temperature extremes that are much colder than comparable range limits on other continents. Thus, there is need for methodological refinements and improved spatiotemporal data regarding changes in mangrove structure and abundance near northern range limits in the southeastern USA. Advancing understanding of rapidly changing range limits is critical for foundation plant species such as mangroves, as it provides a basis for anticipating and preparing for the cascading effects of climate-induced species redistribution on ecosystems and the human communities that depend on their ecosystem services.

15 November 2018 in Marine Ecology Progress Series
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MLMm Lamont
Mm Lamont
AIAr Iverson
Ar Iverson

1 January 2016 in Gulf of Mexico Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BGBenny J. Gallaway
Benny J. Gallaway
WGWilliam J. Gazey
William J. Gazey
CCCharles W. Caillouet
Charles W. Caillouet
PPPamela T. Plotkin
Pamela T. Plotkin
FGF. Alberto Abreu Grobois
F. Alberto Abreu Grobois
BNBlanca M. Zapata Najera
Blanca M. Zapata Najera

26 November 2018 in Ecology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KHKristen Hart
Kristen Hart
AIAutumn Iverson
Autumn Iverson
IFIkuko Fujisaki
Ikuko Fujisaki
MLMargaret M. Lamont
Margaret M. Lamont
DBDavid Bucklin
David Bucklin
DSDonna Jill Shaver
Donna Jill Shaver
Animals co‐occurring in a region (sympatry) may use the same habitat (syntopy) within that region. A central aim in ecology is determining what factors drive species distributions (i.e., abiotic conditions, dispersal limitations, and/or biotic interactions). Assessing the degree of biotic interactions can be difficult for species with wide ranges at sea. This study investigated the spatial ecology of two sea turtle species that forage on benthic invertebrates in neritic GoM waters: Kemp's ridleys (Lepidochelys kempii) and loggerheads (Caretta caretta). We used satellite tracking and modeled behavioral modes, then calculated individual home ranges, compared foraging areas, and determined extent of co‐occurrence. Using six environmental variables and principal component analysis, we assessed similarity of chosen foraging sites. We predicted foraging location (eco‐region) based on species, nesting site, and turtle size. For 127 turtles (64 Kemp's ridleys, 63 loggerheads) tracked from 1989 to 2013, foraging home ranges were nine to ten times larger for Kemp's ridleys than for loggerheads. Species intersected off all U.S. coasts and the Yucatán Peninsula, but co‐occurrence areas were small compared to species' distributions. Kemp's ridley foraging home ranges were concentrated in the northern GoM, whereas those for loggerheads were concentrated in the eastern GoM. The two species were different in all habitat variables compared (latitude, longitude, distance to shore, net primary production, mean sea surface temperature, and bathymetry). Nesting site was the single dominant variable that dictated foraging ecoregion. Although Kemp's ridleys and loggerheads may compete for resources, the separation in foraging areas, significant differences in environmental conditions, and importance of nesting location on ecoregion selection (i.e., dispersal ability) indicate that adult females of these species do not interact greatly during foraging and that dispersal and environmental factors more strongly determine their distributions. These species show sympatry in this region but evidence for syntopy was rare.