Paul Jerem

Paul Jerem

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Paul Jerem

Department of Evolution, Behaviour and Environment, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2015 in Physiology & Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KHKatherine A. Herborn
Katherine A. Herborn
JGJames L. Graves
James L. Graves
PJPaul Jerem
Paul Jerem
NENeil P. Evans
Neil P. Evans
RNRuedi Nager
Ruedi Nager
DMDorothy E.F. McKeegan
Dorothy E.F. McKeegan
Acute stress triggers peripheral vasoconstriction, causing a rapid, short-term drop in skin temperature in homeotherms. We tested, for the first time, whether this response has the potential to quantify stress, by exhibiting proportionality with stressor intensity. We used established behavioural and hormonal markers: activity level and corticosterone level, to validate a mild and more severe form of an acute restraint stressor in hens (Gallus gallus domesticus). We then used infrared thermography (IRT) to non-invasively collect continuous temperature measurements following exposure to these two intensities of acute handling stress. In the comb and wattle, two skin regions with a known thermoregulatory role, stressor intensity predicted the extent of initial skin cooling, and also the occurrence of a more delayed skin warming, providing two opportunities to quantify stress. With the present, cost-effective availability of IRT technology, this non-invasive and continuous method of stress assessment in unrestrained animals has the potential to become common practice in pure and applied research.

11 April 2020 in Conservation Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PJPaul Jerem
Paul Jerem
FMFiona Mathews
Fiona Mathews
Anthropogenic noise is a globally widespread sensory pollutant, recognised as having potentially adverse effects on function, demography, and physiology in wild animals. Human population growth, and associated changes in urbanisation, transportation, and resource extraction, all contribute to anthropogenic noise and are predicted to increase in the coming decades. As a result, wildlife exposure to anthropogenic noise is expected to rise correspondingly. Data collected by field research are uniquely important in advancing understanding of the real‐world repercussions of human activity on wildlife. We therefore performed a comprehensive systematic review of literature published between 2008–2018 that reported field investigations of anthropogenic noise impacts. We evaluated publication metrics, geographical distribution, study subject, and methodology. Research activity increased markedly over the assessment period. However, there was a pronounced geographical bias in research, with most being conducted in North America or Europe, and a notable focus on terrestrial environments. Fewer than one‐fifth of terrestrial studies were located in rural areas likely to experience urbanisation by 2030, meaning data on ecosystems most likely to be affected by future changes are not being gathered. There was also bias in the taxonomic groups investigated: most research was conducted on birds and aquatic mammals, whereas terrestrial mammals, reptiles, amphibians, fish, and invertebrates received only limited research attention. Almost all terrestrial studies examined diurnal species, despite evidence that nocturnality is the prevailing animal activity pattern. Nearly half the studies investigated effects of road or urban noise, with the bulk of research effort being restricted to functional, rather than physiological or demographic consequences. Few experimental studies addressed repercussions of longer‐term exposure to anthropogenic noise, or longer‐term post‐exposure effects, and multiple noise‐types or levels were rarely compared. These knowledge gaps will need to be tackled swiftly if we are to successfully manage effects of increasing worldwide wildlife exposure to anthropogenic noise. Article impact statement: Future field research into effects of noise pollution on wildlife must focus on underrepresented ecosystems, taxa, and activity patterns. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

30 January 2018 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PJPaul Jerem
Paul Jerem
SJSusanne Jenni-Eiermann
Susanne Jenni-Eiermann
KHKatherine Herborn
Katherine Herborn
DMDorothy McKeegan
Dorothy McKeegan
DMDominic J. McCafferty
Dominic J. McCafferty
RNRuedi G. Nager
Ruedi G. Nager
Body temperature of endotherms shows substantial within- and between-individual variation, but the sources of this variation are not fully understood in wild animals. Variation in body temperature can indicate how individuals cope with their environment via metabolic or stress-induced effects, both of which may relate to depletion of energy reserves. Body condition can reflect heat production through changes to metabolic rate made to protect energy reserves. Additionally, changes in metabolic processes may be mediated by stress-related glucocorticoid secretion, which is associated with altered blood-flow patterns that affect regional body temperatures. Accordingly, both body condition and glucocorticoid secretion should relate to body temperature. We used thermal imaging, a novel non-invasive method of temperature measurement, to investigate relationships between body condition, glucocorticoid secretion and body surface temperature in wild blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus). Individuals with lower body condition had lower eye-region surface temperature in both non-breeding and breeding seasons. Eye-region surface temperature was also negatively correlated with baseline circulating glucocorticoid levels in non-breeding birds. Our results demonstrate that body surface temperature can integrate multiple aspects of physiological state. Consequently, remotely-measured body surface temperature could be used to assess such aspects of physiological state non-invasively in free-living animals at multiple life history stages.

9 March 2022 in Biological Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ACAndrew D. Cronin
Andrew D. Cronin
JSJudith A. H. Smit
Judith A. H. Smit
MMMatías I. Muñoz
Matías I. Muñoz
APArmand Poirier
Armand Poirier
PMPeter A. Moran
Peter A. Moran
WHWouter Halfwerk
Wouter Halfwerk
Urbanisation can affect mating opportunities and thereby alter inter‐ and intra‐sexual selection pressures on sexual traits. Biotic and abiotic urban conditions can influence an individual's success in pre‐ and post‐copulatory mating, for example through impacts on mate attraction and mate preference, fertilisation success, resource competition or rival interactions. Divergent sexual selection pressures can lead to differences in behavioural, physiological, morphological or life‐history traits between urban and non‐urban populations, ultimately driving adaptation and speciation. Most studies on urban sexual selection and mating interactions report differences between urban and non‐urban populations or correlations between sexual traits and factors associated with increased urbanisation, such as pollution, food availability and risk of predation and parasitism. Here we review the literature on sexual selection and sexual traits in relation to urbanisation or urban‐associated conditions. We provide an extensive list of abiotic and biotic factors that can influence processes involved in mating interactions, such as signal production and transmission, mate choice and mating opportunities. We discuss all relevant data through the lens of two, non‐mutually exclusive theories on sexual selection, namely indicator and sensory models. Where possible, we indicate whether these models provide the same or different predictions regarding urban‐adapted sexual signals and describe different experimental designs that can be useful for the different models as well as to investigate the drivers of sexual selection. We argue that we lack a good understanding of: (i) the factors driving urban sexual selection; (ii) whether reported changes in traits result in adaptive benefits; and (iii) whether these changes reflect a short‐term ecological, or long‐term evolutionary response. We highlight that urbanisation provides a unique opportunity to study the process and outcomes of sexual selection, but that this requires a highly integrative approach combining experimental and observational work.

4 October 2021 in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
WHWouter Halfwerk
Wouter Halfwerk
PJPaul Jerem
Paul Jerem
Levels of anthropogenic noise and artificial light at night (ALAN) are rapidly rising on a global scale. Both sensory pollutants are well known to affect animal behavior and physiology, which can lead to substantial ecological impacts. Most studies on noise or light pollution to date have focused on single stressor impacts, studying both pollutants in isolation despite their high spatial and temporal co-occurrence. However, few studies have addressed their combined impact, known as multisensory pollution, with the specific aim to assess whether the interaction between noise and light pollution leads to predictable, additive effects, or less predictable, synergistic or antagonistic effects. We carried out a systematic review of research investigating multisensory pollution and found 28 studies that simultaneously assessed the impact of anthropogenic noise and ALAN on animal function (e.g., behavior, morphology or life-history), physiology (e.g., stress, oxidative, or immune status), or population demography (e.g., abundance or species richness). Only fifteen of these studies specifically tested for possible interactive effects when both sensory pollutants were combined. Four out of eight experimental studies revealed a significant interaction effect, in contrast to only three out seven observational studies. We discuss the benefits and limitations of experimental vs. observational studies addressing multisensory pollution and call for more specific testing of the diverse ways in which noise and light pollution can interact to affect wildlife.

1 October 2019 in Physiology & Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PJPaul Jerem
Paul Jerem
SJSusanne Jenni-Eiermann
Susanne Jenni-Eiermann
DMDorothy McKeegan
Dorothy McKeegan
DMDominic J. McCafferty
Dominic J. McCafferty
RNRuedi G. Nager
Ruedi G. Nager
Reactions to acute stressors are critical for survival. Yet, the challenges of assessing underlying physiological processes in the field limit our understanding of how variation in the acute stress response relates to fitness in free-living animals. Glucocorticoid secretion during acute stress can be measured from blood plasma concentrations, but each blood sample can only provide information for one point in time. Also, the number of samples that can be extracted from an individual in the field is usually limited to avoid compromising welfare. This restricts capacity for repeated assessment, and therefore temporal resolution of findings within- and between-acute stress responses - both of which are important for determining links between acute stress and fitness. Acute stress induces additional body surface temperature changes that can be measured non-invasively, and at high frequencies using thermal imaging, offering opportunities to overcome these limitations. But, this method's usefulness in the field depends on the extent that environmental conditions affect the body surface temperature response, which remains poorly understood. We assessed the relative importance of individual physiology (baseline glucocorticoid concentrations) and environmental conditions (air temperature and relative humidity) in determining the eye region surface temperature (Teye) response to acute stress, in wild blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) during trapping, handling and blood sampling. When controlling for between-individual baseline variation, Teye initially dropped rapidly below, and then recovered above baseline, before declining more slowly until the end of the test, 160 s after trap closure. One measure of the amplitude of this response - the size of the initial drop in Teye - was dependent on environmental conditions, but not baseline corticosterone. Whereas, two properties defining response dynamics - the timing of the initial drop, and the slope of the subsequent recovery - were related to baseline corticosterone concentrations, independently of environmental conditions. This suggests inferring the acute stress response using thermal imaging of Teye will be practical under fluctuating environmental conditions in the field.