Background: Reconstruction surgery-associated stricture frequently occurs in patients with long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA). While several endoscopic dilatation methods have been applied and would be desirable, endoscopic recanalization is very difficult in cases with complete esophageal closure. Surgical treatment has been performed for a severe stricture, which causes extensive damage to the infant. No reports have described successful endoscopic recanalization for complete closure due to scarring after surgery for LGEA. We herein report the case of successful endoscopic recanalization by single endoscopist in an LGEA patient with complete closure after reconstruction surgery. Case presentation: A seven-month-old boy with LGEA who received reconstruction surgery and gastrostomy immediately after birth presented to our unit due to vomiting and malnutrition. Contrast radiography and peroral endoscopy detected complete closure of the esophagus at the anastomotic site. After confirming the length of stricture as several millimeters, we punctured the center of the lumen with a 25-G puncture needle under fluoroscopy. An endoscope was then inserted via the gastrostomy and the puncture hole was detected at the center of the lumen. After passing the guidewire, endoscopic balloon dilation was performed three times, and the hole was sufficiently dilatated. Oral ingestion was feasible, and his nutritional condition was improved. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first report to propose a less invasive endoscopic approach to recanalize a site of complete esophageal closure in a LGEA patient after reconstruction surgery by single endoscopist. Our endoscopic procedure using an ultrathin endoscope and puncture needle may be a therapeutic option for the treatment of patients with complete esophageal closure in a LGEA patient after reconstruction surgery.

Background: Screening of latent tuberculosis (TB) before the induction of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents is very important to prevent the reactivation of TB. However, active TB can still occur, and the ideal therapeutic strategy for IBD patients who develop active TB has not been established. Case presentation: A 21-year-old Vietnamese man with active ileo-colonic Crohn’s disease visited our hospital. While computed tomography (CT) revealed a nodular lesion at the right lung, a serological interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) and several culture tests were all negative. The intravenous administration of infliximab-biosimilar (IFX-BS) with an immunomodulator were initiated. After the induction therapy, he achieved clinical remission. However, he presented with a high fever 17 weeks after the initiation. CT revealed the expansion of the nodular lesion at the right lung, and serological IGRA was positive. He was diagnosed with reactivation of latent TB. He had not achieved mucosal healing when immunosuppressive therapy was discontinued. Thus, he was administered vedolizumab (VDZ), which was considered not to influence the TB status, as maintenance therapy. Consequently, he achieved mucosal healing without relapse of active TB.Conclusions: This is the first report to describe the safe usage of VDZ as maintenance therapy without the induction of TB relapse in a CD patient. In Asian countries, clinicians must be alert for the reactivation of latent TB during the administration of anti-TNF agents. VDZ might be a safe option for maintenance therapy in CD patients, even in cases with active TB.