Mary Susanne Wisz

Mary Susanne Wisz

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Mary Susanne Wisz

Ocean Sustainability, Governance and Management, World Maritime University, Malmö, Sweden

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 March 2006 in Ecography
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JEJane Elith
Jane Elith
CGCatherine H. Graham
Catherine H. Graham
RARobert P. Anderson
Robert P. Anderson
MDMiroslav Dudík
Miroslav Dudík
SFSimon Ferrier
Simon Ferrier
NZNiklaus Zimmermann
Niklaus Zimmermann
Prediction of species’ distributions is central to diverse applications in ecology, evolution and conservation science. There is increasing electronic access to vast sets of occurrence records in museums and herbaria, yet little effective guidance on how best to use this information in the context of numerous approaches for modelling distributions. To meet this need, we compared 16 modelling methods over 226 species from 6 regions of the world, creating the most comprehensive set of model comparisons to date. We used presence‐only data to fit models, and independent presence‐absence data to evaluate the predictions. Along with well‐established modelling methods such as generalised additive models and GARP and BIOCLIM, we explored methods that either have been developed recently or have rarely been applied to modelling species’ distributions. These include machine‐learning methods and community models, both of which have features that may make them particularly well suited to noisy or sparse information, as is typical of species’ occurrence data. Presence‐only data were effective for modelling species’ distributions for many species and regions. The novel methods consistently outperformed more established methods. The results of our analysis are promising for the use of data from museums and herbaria, especially as methods suited to the noise inherent in such data improve.

12 August 2008 in Diversity and Distributions
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MWM. S. Wisz
M. S. Wisz
RHRobert https://desp.ucdavis.edu/people/robert-j-hijmans
Robert https://desp.ucdavis.edu/people/robert-j-hijmans
JLJ. Li
J. Li
APA. Townsend Peterson
A. Townsend Peterson
CGC. H. Graham
C. H. Graham
NGNCEAS Predicting Species Distributions Working Group
NCEAS Predicting Species Distributions Working Group
A wide range of modelling algorithms is used by ecologists, conservation practitioners, and others to predict species ranges from point locality data. Unfortunately, the amount of data available is limited for many taxa and regions, making it essential to quantify the sensitivity of these algorithms to sample size. This is the first study to address this need by rigorously evaluating a broad suite of algorithms with independent presence–absence data from multiple species and regions. We evaluated predictions from 12 algorithms for 46 species (from six different regions of the world) at three sample sizes (100, 30, and 10 records). We used data from natural history collections to run the models, and evaluated the quality of model predictions with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). With decreasing sample size, model accuracy decreased and variability increased across species and between models. Novel modelling methods that incorporate both interactions between predictor variables and complex response shapes (i.e. GBM, MARS‐INT, BRUTO) performed better than most methods at large sample sizes but not at the smallest sample sizes. Other algorithms were much less sensitive to sample size, including an algorithm based on maximum entropy (MAXENT) that had among the best predictive power across all sample sizes. Relative to other algorithms, a distance metric algorithm (DOMAIN) and a genetic algorithm (OM‐GARP) had intermediate performance at the largest sample size and among the best performance at the lowest sample size. No algorithm predicted consistently well with small sample size (n < 30) and this should encourage highly conservative use of predictions based on small sample size and restrict their use to exploratory modelling.

12 June 2012 in Biological Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MWMary Susanne Wisz
Mary Susanne Wisz
JPJulien Pottier
Julien Pottier
WKW. Daniel Kissling
W. Daniel Kissling
LPLoïc Pellissier
Loïc Pellissier
JLJonathan Lenoir
Jonathan Lenoir
Jens-Christian SvenningJens-Christian Svenning
Jens-Christian Svenning
Predicting which species will occur together in the future, and where, remains one of the greatest challenges in ecology, and requires a sound understanding of how the abiotic and biotic environments interact with dispersal processes and history across scales. Biotic interactions and their dynamics influence species' relationships to climate, and this also has important implications for predicting future distributions of species. It is already well accepted that biotic interactions shape species' spatial distributions at local spatial extents, but the role of these interactions beyond local extents (e.g. 10 km2 to global extents) are usually dismissed as unimportant. In this review we consolidate evidence for how biotic interactions shape species distributions beyond local extents and review methods for integrating biotic interactions into species distribution modelling tools. Drawing upon evidence from contemporary and palaeoecological studies of individual species ranges, functional groups, and species richness patterns, we show that biotic interactions have clearly left their mark on species distributions and realised assemblages of species across all spatial extents. We demonstrate this with examples from within and across trophic groups. A range of species distribution modelling tools is available to quantify species environmental relationships and predict species occurrence, such as: (i) integrating pairwise dependencies, (ii) using integrative predictors, and (iii) hybridising species distribution models (SDMs) with dynamic models. These methods have typically only been applied to interacting pairs of species at a single time, require a priori ecological knowledge about which species interact, and due to data paucity must assume that biotic interactions are constant in space and time. To better inform the future development of these models across spatial scales, we call for accelerated collection of spatially and temporally explicit species data. Ideally, these data should be sampled to reflect variation in the underlying environment across large spatial extents, and at fine spatial resolution. Simplified ecosystems where there are relatively few interacting species and sometimes a wealth of existing ecosystem monitoring data (e.g. arctic, alpine or island habitats) offer settings where the development of modelling tools that account for biotic interactions may be less difficult than elsewhere.

1 January 2009 in BMC Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MWMary S Wisz
Mary S Wisz
AGAntoine Guisan
Antoine Guisan
Multiple logistic regression is precluded from many practical applications in ecology that aim to predict the geographic distributions of species because it requires absence data, which are rarely available or are unreliable. In order to use multiple logistic regression, many studies have simulated "pseudo-absences" through a number of strategies, but it is unknown how the choice of strategy influences models and their geographic predictions of species. In this paper we evaluate the effect of several prevailing pseudo-absence strategies on the predictions of the geographic distribution of a virtual species whose "true" distribution and relationship to three environmental predictors was predefined. We evaluated the effect of using a) real absences b) pseudo-absences selected randomly from the background and c) two-step approaches: pseudo-absences selected from low suitability areas predicted by either Ecological Niche Factor Analysis: (ENFA) or BIOCLIM. We compared how the choice of pseudo-absence strategy affected model fit, predictive power, and information-theoretic model selection results.

30 May 2014 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LPLoïc Pellissier
Loïc Pellissier
FLFabien Leprieur
Fabien Leprieur
VPValeriano Parravicini
Valeriano Parravicini
PCPeter Cowman
Peter Cowman
MKMichel Kulbicki
Michel Kulbicki
DMDavid Mouillot
David Mouillot
Ancient reefs provided fishy refuges: Climate fluctuations have occurred repeatedly in Earth's history, and so there is much to be learned from examining the responses of past systems. Pellessier et al. reconstructed paleoenvironments over the past 3 million years from sediment cores collected across coral reef systems to explore the impacts of past conditions on reef fish diversity. Coral reefs survived in the Indo-Australian regions during times of otherwise extensive habitat loss. These robust reefs can explain much of the diversity found in present-day reef fish species. Science , this issue p. 1016

5 June 2013 in Global Ecology and Biogeography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AEAnne Eskildsen
Anne Eskildsen
PRPeter C. le Roux
Peter C. le Roux
RHRisto K. Heikkinen
Risto K. Heikkinen
Toke HoyeToke Hoye
Toke Hoye
WKW. Daniel Kissling
W. Daniel Kissling
MLMiska Luoto
Miska Luoto