Jiayi Zhou

Jiayi Zhou

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Jiayi Zhou

Peking University

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 November 2025 in ACM Computing Surveys
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JJJiaming Ji
Jiaming Ji
TQTianyi Qiu
Tianyi Qiu
BCBoyuan Chen
Boyuan Chen
JZJiayi Zhou
Jiayi Zhou
BZBorong Zhang
Borong Zhang
WGWen Gao
Wen Gao
AI alignment aims to make AI systems behave in line with human intentions and values. As AI systems grow more capable, so do risks from misalignment. To provide a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the alignment field, in this survey, we delve into the core concepts, methodology, and practice of alignment. First, we identify four principles as the key objectives of AI alignment: Robustness, Interpretability, Controllability, and Ethicality ( RICE ). Guided by these four principles, we outline the landscape of current alignment research and decompose them into two key components: forward alignment and backward alignment . The former aims to make AI systems aligned via alignment training, while the latter aims to gain evidence about the systems’ alignment and govern them appropriately to avoid exacerbating misalignment risks. On forward alignment, we discuss techniques for learning from feedback and learning under the distribution shift. Specifically, we survey traditional preference modeling methods and reinforcement learning from human feedback and further discuss potential frameworks to reach scalable oversight for tasks where effective human oversight is hard to obtain. Within learning under distribution shift, we also cover data distribution interventions such as adversarial training that helps expand the distribution of training data and algorithmic interventions to combat goal misgeneralization. On backward alignment, we discuss assurance techniques and governance practices. Specifically, we survey assurance methods of AI systems throughout their lifecycle, covering safety evaluation, interpretability, and human value compliance. We discuss current and prospective governance practices adopted by governments, industry actors, and other third parties, aimed at managing existing and future AI risks. This survey aims to provide a comprehensive yet beginner-friendly review of alignment research topics. Based on this, we also release and continually update the website www.alignmentsurvey.com which features tutorials, collections of papers, blog posts, and other resources.