Gabriella Moraes

Gabriella Moraes

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Gabriella Moraes

Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2021 in Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GMGabriella Moraes
Gabriella Moraes
DFDun Jack Fu
Dun Jack Fu
MWMarc Wilson
Marc Wilson
HKHagar Khalid
Hagar Khalid
SWSiegfried K. Wagner
Siegfried K. Wagner
RCReena Chopra
Reena Chopra
To apply a deep learning algorithm for automated, objective, and comprehensive quantification of OCT scans to a large real-world dataset of eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and make the raw segmentation output data openly available for further research. Retrospective analysis of OCT images from the Moorfields Eye Hospital AMD Database. A total of 2473 first-treated eyes and 493 second-treated eyes that commenced therapy for neovascular AMD between June 2012 and June 2017. A deep learning algorithm was used to segment all baseline OCT scans. Volumes were calculated for segmented features such as neurosensory retina (NSR), drusen, intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), subretinal hyperreflective material (SHRM), retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), hyperreflective foci (HRF), fibrovascular pigment epithelium detachment (fvPED), and serous PED (sPED). Analyses included comparisons between first- and second-treated eyes by visual acuity (VA) and race/ethnicity and correlations between volumes. Volumes of segmented features (mm3) and central subfield thickness (CST) (μm). In first-treated eyes, the majority had both IRF and SRF (54.7%). First-treated eyes had greater volumes for all segmented tissues, with the exception of drusen, which was greater in second-treated eyes. In first-treated eyes, older age was associated with lower volumes for RPE, SRF, NSR, and sPED; in second-treated eyes, older age was associated with lower volumes of NSR, RPE, sPED, fvPED, and SRF. Eyes from Black individuals had higher SRF, RPE, and serous PED volumes compared with other ethnic groups. Greater volumes of the majority of features were associated with worse VA. We report the results of large-scale automated quantification of a novel range of baseline features in neovascular AMD. Major differences between first- and second-treated eyes, with increasing age, and between ethnicities are highlighted. In the coming years, enhanced, automated OCT segmentation may assist personalization of real-world care and the detection of novel structure–function correlations. These data will be made publicly available for replication and future investigation by the AMD research community.

5 February 2022 in Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAbdallah Abbas
Abdallah Abbas
COCiara O’bYrne
Ciara O’bYrne
DFDun Jack Fu
Dun Jack Fu
GMGabriella Moraes
Gabriella Moraes
KBKonstantinos Balaskas
Konstantinos Balaskas
PKPearse Keane
Pearse Keane
Purpose: Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is a major global cause of blindness. Whilst anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment is effective, response varies considerably between individuals. Thus, patients face substantial uncertainty regarding their future ability to perform daily tasks. In this study, we evaluate the performance of an automated machine learning (AutoML) model which predicts visual acuity (VA) outcomes in patients receiving treatment for nAMD, in comparison to a manually coded model built using the same dataset. Furthermore, we evaluate model performance across ethnic groups and analyse how the models reach their predictions. Methods: Binary classification models were trained to predict whether patients’ VA would be ‘Above’ or ‘Below’ a score of 70 one year after initiating treatment, measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. The AutoML model was built using the Google Cloud Platform, whilst the bespoke model was trained using an XGBoost framework. Models were compared and analysed using the What-if Tool (WIT), a novel model-agnostic interpretability tool. Results: Our study included 1631 eyes from patients attending Moorfields Eye Hospital. The AutoML model (area under the curve [AUC], 0.849) achieved a highly similar performance to the XGBoost model (AUC, 0.847). Using the WIT, we found that the models over-predicted negative outcomes in Asian patients and performed worse in those with an ethnic category of Other. Baseline VA, age and ethnicity were the most important determinants of model predictions. Partial dependence plot analysis revealed a sigmoidal relationship between baseline VA and the probability of an outcome of ‘Above’. Conclusion: We have described and validated an AutoML-WIT pipeline which enables clinicians with minimal coding skills to match the performance of a state-of-the-art algorithm and obtain explainable predictions.