Subramanian Baskar

Subramanian Baskar

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Subramanian Baskar

Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Thiagarajar College of Engineering, Madurai, India

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 May 2006 in IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJing Liang
Jing Liang
Kai QinKai Qin
Kai Qin
PSPonnuthurai Nagaratnam Suganthan
Ponnuthurai Nagaratnam Suganthan
SBS. Baskar
S. Baskar
This paper presents a variant of particle swarm optimizers (PSOs) that we call the comprehensive learning particle swarm optimizer (CLPSO), which uses a novel learning strategy whereby all other particles' historical best information is used to update a particle's velocity. This strategy enables the diversity of the swarm to be preserved to discourage premature convergence. Experiments were conducted (using codes available from http://www.ntu.edu.sg/home/epnsugan) on multimodal test functions such as Rosenbrock, Griewank, Rastrigin, Ackley, and Schwefel and composition functions both with and without coordinate rotation. The results demonstrate good performance of the CLPSO in solving multimodal problems when compared with eight other recent variants of the PSO.

18 November 2008 in IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SKS. Kannan
S. Kannan
SBS. Baskar
S. Baskar
JMJames D. McCalley
James D. McCalley
PMP. Murugan
P. Murugan
This paper describes use of a multiobjective optimization method, elitist nondominated sorting genetic algorithm version II (NSGA-II), to the generation expansion planning (GEP) problem. The proposed model provides for decision maker choice from among the different trade-off solutions. Two different problem formulations are considered. In one formulation, the first objective is to minimize cost; the second objective is to minimize sum of normalized constraint violations. In the other formulation, the first objective is to minimize investment cost; the second objective is to minimize outage cost (or maximize reliability). Virtual mapping procedure is introduced to improve the performance of NSGA-II. The GEP problem considered is a test system for a six-year planning horizon having five types of candidate units. The results are compared and validated.

1 April 2009 in Electric Power Systems Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PMP. Murugan
P. Murugan
SKS. Kannan
S. Kannan
SBS. Baskar
S. Baskar

1 May 2011 in International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SDS. Dhanalakshmi
S. Dhanalakshmi
SKS. Kannan
S. Kannan
KMK. Mahadevan
K. Mahadevan
SBS. Baskar
S. Baskar

1 February 2011 in International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SJS. Jeyadevi
S. Jeyadevi
SBS. Baskar
S. Baskar
CBC.K. Babulal
C.K. Babulal
MIM. Willjuice Iruthayarajan
M. Willjuice Iruthayarajan

1 February 2012 in Applied Soft Computing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SRS. Ramesh
S. Ramesh
SKS. Kannan
S. Kannan
SBS. Baskar
S. Baskar