Susan C. Anenberg

Susan C. Anenberg

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Susan C. Anenberg

Milken Institute School of Public Health George Washington University Washington DC USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 May 2017 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SASusan C. Anenberg
Susan C. Anenberg
JMJoshua Miller
Joshua Miller
RMRay Minjares
Ray Minjares
LDLi Du
Li Du
DHDaven K. Henze
Daven K. Henze
CHChris Heyes
Chris Heyes

1 September 2010 in Environmental Health Perspectives
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SASusan C. Anenberg
Susan C. Anenberg
LHLarry Horowitz
Larry Horowitz
QTQuansong Tong
Quansong Tong
JWJ. Jason West
J. Jason West
A peer-reviewed open access journal published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

22 September 2013 in Nature Climate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JWJ. Jason West
J. Jason West
SSSteven J. Smith
Steven J. Smith
RSRaquel A. Silva
Raquel A. Silva
VNVaishali Naik
Vaishali Naik
Yuqiang ZhangYuqiang Zhang
Yuqiang Zhang
JLJean-Francois Lamarque
Jean-Francois Lamarque
Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions often reduces co-emitted air pollutants, with advantages for human health. Avoided mortality from air pollution, a co-benefit of CO2 abatement, is estimated under global climate change mitigation scenarios to be in the range of US$50–US$380 per tonne of CO2. This exceeds the projected mitigation costs for 2030 and 2050, and is within the lower range of costs expected in 2100. Actions to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions often reduce co-emitted air pollutants, bringing co-benefits for air quality and human health. Past studies1,2,3,4,5,6 typically evaluated near-term and local co-benefits, neglecting the long-range transport of air pollutants7,8,9, long-term demographic changes, and the influence of climate change on air quality10,11,12. Here we simulate the co-benefits of global GHG reductions on air quality and human health using a global atmospheric model and consistent future scenarios, via two mechanisms: reducing co-emitted air pollutants, and slowing climate change and its effect on air quality. We use new relationships between chronic mortality and exposure to fine particulate matter13 and ozone14, global modelling methods15 and new future scenarios16. Relative to a reference scenario, global GHG mitigation avoids 0.5±0.2, 1.3±0.5 and 2.2±0.8 million premature deaths in 2030, 2050 and 2100. Global average marginal co-benefits of avoided mortality are US$50–380 per tonne of CO2, which exceed previous estimates, exceed marginal abatement costs in 2030 and 2050, and are within the low range of costs in 2100. East Asian co-benefits are 10–70 times the marginal cost in 2030. Air quality and health co-benefits, especially as they are mainly local and near-term, provide strong additional motivation for transitioning to a low-carbon future.

31 May 2011 in Risk Analysis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NFNeal Fann
Neal Fann
ALAmy D. Lamson
Amy D. Lamson
SASusan C. Anenberg
Susan C. Anenberg
KWKaren Wesson
Karen Wesson
DRDavid Risley
David Risley
BHBryan J. Hubbell
Bryan J. Hubbell

5 January 2022 in The Lancet Planetary Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
VSVeronica A Southerland
Veronica A Southerland
MBMichael Brauer
Michael Brauer
AMArash Mohegh
Arash Mohegh
MHMelanie S Hammer
Melanie S Hammer
ADAaron van Donkelaar
Aaron van Donkelaar
SASusan C Anenberg
Susan C Anenberg
With much of the world's population residing in urban areas, an understanding of air pollution exposures at the city level can inform mitigation approaches. Previous studies of global urban air pollution have not considered trends in air pollutant concentrations nor corresponding attributable mortality burdens. We aimed to estimate trends in fine particulate matter (PM2·5) concentrations and associated mortality for cities globally. We use high-resolution annual average PM2·5 concentrations, epidemiologically derived concentration response functions, and country-level baseline disease rates to estimate population-weighted PM2·5 concentrations and attributable cause-specific mortality in 13 160 urban centres between the years 2000 and 2019. Although regional averages of urban PM2·5 concentrations decreased between the years 2000 and 2019, we found considerable heterogeneity in trends of PM2·5 concentrations between urban areas. Approximately 86% (2·5 billion inhabitants) of urban inhabitants lived in urban areas that exceeded WHO's 2005 guideline annual average PM2·5 (10 μg/m3), resulting in an excess of 1·8 million (95% CI 1·34 million–2·3 million) deaths in 2019. Regional averages of PM2·5-attributable deaths increased in all regions except for Europe and the Americas, driven by changes in population numbers, age structures, and disease rates. In some cities, PM2·5-attributable mortality increased despite decreases in PM2·5 concentrations, resulting from shifting age distributions and rates of non-communicable disease. Our study showed that, between the years 2000 and 2019, most of the world's urban population lived in areas with unhealthy levels of PM2·5, leading to substantial contributions to non-communicable disease burdens. Our results highlight that avoiding the large public health burden from urban PM2·5 will require strategies that reduce exposure through emissions mitigation, as well as strategies that reduce vulnerability to PM2·5 by improving overall public health. NASA, Wellcome Trust.

1 June 2012 in Environmental Health Perspectives
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SASusan C. Anenberg
Susan C. Anenberg
JSJoel Schwartz
Joel Schwartz
DSDrew Shindell
Drew Shindell
MAMarkus Amann
Markus Amann
GFGreg Faluvegi
Greg Faluvegi
VRVeerabhadran Ramanathan
Veerabhadran Ramanathan
A peer-reviewed open access journal published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences