Petra Korlević

Petra Korlević

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Petra Korlević

Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 November 2017 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KPKay Prüfer
Kay Prüfer
CFCesare de Filippo
Cesare de Filippo
SGSteffi Grote
Steffi Grote
FMFabrizio Mafessoni
Fabrizio Mafessoni
PKPetra Korlević
Petra Korlević
SPSvante Pääbo
Svante Pääbo
Revelations from a Vindija Neandertal genome: Neandertals clearly interbred with the ancestors of non-African modern humans, but many questions remain about our closest ancient relatives. Prüfer et al. present a 30-fold-coverage genome sequence from 50,000- to 65,000-year-old samples from a Neandertal woman found in Vindija, Croatia, and compared this sequence with genomes obtained from the Altai Neandertal, the Denisovans, and ancient and modern humans (see the Perspective by Bergström and Tyler-Smith). Neandertals likely lived in small groups and had lower genetic diversity than modern humans. The findings increase the number of Neandertal variants identified within populations of modern humans, and they suggest that a larger number of phenotypic and diseaserelated variants with Neandertal ancestry remain in the modern Eurasian gene pool than previously thought. Science , this issue p. 655 ; see also p. 586

1 August 2015 in BioTechniques
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PKPetra Korlević
Petra Korlević
TGTobias Gerber
Tobias Gerber
MGMarie-Theres Gansauge
Marie-Theres Gansauge
MHMateja Hajdinjak
Mateja Hajdinjak
SNSarah Nagel
Sarah Nagel
MMMatthias Meyer
Matthias Meyer
Although great progress has been made in improving methods for generating DNA sequences from ancient biological samples, many, if not most, samples are still not amenable for analyses due to overwhelming...

23 January 2017 in Nucleic Acids Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MGMarie-Theres Gansauge
Marie-Theres Gansauge
TGTobias Gerber
Tobias Gerber
IGIsabelle Glocke
Isabelle Glocke
PKPetra Korlević
Petra Korlević
LLLaurin Lippik
Laurin Lippik
MMMatthias Meyer
Matthias Meyer
DNA library preparation for high-throughput sequencing of genomic DNA usually involves ligation of adapters to double-stranded DNA fragments. However, for highly degraded DNA, especially ancient DNA, library preparation has been found to be more efficient if each of the two DNA strands are converted into library molecules separately. We present a new method for single-stranded library preparation, ssDNA2.0, which is based on single-stranded DNA ligation with T4 DNA ligase utilizing a splinter oligonucleotide with a stretch of random bases hybridized to a 3΄ biotinylated donor oligonucleotide. A thorough evaluation of this ligation scheme shows that single-stranded DNA can be ligated to adapter oligonucleotides in higher concentration than with CircLigase (an RNA ligase that was previously chosen for end-to-end ligation in single-stranded library preparation) and that biases in ligation can be minimized when choosing splinters with 7 or 8 random nucleotides. We show that ssDNA2.0 tolerates higher quantities of input DNA than CircLigase-based library preparation, is less costly and better compatible with automation. We also provide an in-depth comparison of library preparation methods on degraded DNA from various sources. Most strikingly, we find that single-stranded library preparation increases library yields from tissues stored in formalin for many years by several orders of magnitude.

21 March 2018 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MHMateja Hajdinjak
Mateja Hajdinjak
QFQiaomei Fu
Qiaomei Fu
AHAlexander Hübner
Alexander Hübner
MPMartin Petr
Martin Petr
FMFabrizio Mafessoni
Fabrizio Mafessoni
JKJanet Kelso
Janet Kelso
Genetic similarity among late Neanderthals is predicted well by their geographical location, and although some of these Neanderthals were contemporaneous with early modern humans, their genomes show no evidence of recent gene flow from modern humans. Many questions remain about the relationship between populations of Neanderthals around the time of their final interactions with modern humans, and how this contributed to the evolution of modern humans. Janet Kelso, Svante Pääbo and colleagues sequenced the genomes of five Neanderthals that lived between 39,000 and 47,000 years ago, broadening the temporal and geographical range of available Neanderthal genomes. They analyse these genomes together with previously sequenced ancient genomes and find that relatedness among Neanderthals is related to geographic proximity. They find that the majority of gene flow into early modern humans originated from one or more Neanderthal populations that diverged from the late Neanderthals at least 70,000 years ago, but after their split from the Altai Neanderthal approximately 150,000 years ago. Although it has previously been shown that Neanderthals contributed DNA to modern humans1,2, not much is known about the genetic diversity of Neanderthals or the relationship between late Neanderthal populations at the time at which their last interactions with early modern humans occurred and before they eventually disappeared. Our ability to retrieve DNA from a larger number of Neanderthal individuals has been limited by poor preservation of endogenous DNA3 and contamination of Neanderthal skeletal remains by large amounts of microbial and present-day human DNA3,4,5. Here we use hypochlorite treatment6 of as little as 9 mg of bone or tooth powder to generate between 1- and 2.7-fold genomic coverage of five Neanderthals who lived around 39,000 to 47,000 years ago (that is, late Neanderthals), thereby doubling the number of Neanderthals for which genome sequences are available. Genetic similarity among late Neanderthals is well predicted by their geographical location, and comparison to the genome of an older Neanderthal from the Caucasus2,7 indicates that a population turnover is likely to have occurred, either in the Caucasus or throughout Europe, towards the end of Neanderthal history. We find that the bulk of Neanderthal gene flow into early modern humans originated from one or more source populations that diverged from the Neanderthals that were studied here at least 70,000 years ago, but after they split from a previously sequenced Neanderthal from Siberia2 around 150,000 years ago. Although four of the Neanderthals studied here post-date the putative arrival of early modern humans into Europe, we do not detect any recent gene flow from early modern humans in their ancestry.

5 September 2017 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TDThibaut DEVIÈSE
Thibaut DEVIÈSE
IKIvor Karavanić
Ivor Karavanić
DCDaniel Comeskey
Daniel Comeskey
CKCara Kubiak
Cara Kubiak
PKPetra Korlević
Petra Korlević
THTom Higham
Tom Higham
Previous dating of the Vi-207 and Vi-208 Neanderthal remains from Vindija Cave (Croatia) led to the suggestion that Neanderthals survived there as recently as 28,000–29,000 B.P. Subsequent dating yielded older dates, interpreted as ages of at least ∼32,500 B.P. We have redated these same specimens using an approach based on the extraction of the amino acid hydroxyproline, using preparative high-performance liquid chromatography (Prep-HPLC). This method is more efficient in eliminating modern contamination in the bone collagen. The revised dates are older than 40,000 B.P., suggesting the Vindija Neanderthals did not live more recently than others across Europe, and probably predate the arrival of anatomically modern humans in Eastern Europe. We applied zooarchaeology by mass spectrometry (ZooMS) to find additional hominin remains. We identified one bone that is Neanderthal, based on its mitochondrial DNA, and dated it directly to 46,200 ± 1,500 B.P. We also attempted to date six early Upper Paleolithic bone points from stratigraphic units G1, Fd/d+G1 and Fd/d, Fd. One bone artifact gave a date of 29,500 ± 400 B.P., while the remainder yielded no collagen. We additionally dated animal bone samples from units G1 and G1–G3. These dates suggest a co-occurrence of early Upper Paleolithic osseous artifacts, particularly split-based points, alongside the remains of Neanderthals is a result of postdepositional mixing, rather than an association between the two groups, although more work is required to show this definitively. Significance Radiocarbon dating of Neanderthal remains recovered from Vindija Cave (Croatia) initially revealed surprisingly recent results: 28,000–29,000 B.P. This implied the remains could represent a late-surviving, refugial Neanderthal population and suggested they could have been responsible for producing some of the early Upper Paleolithic artefacts more usually produced by anatomically modern humans. This article presents revised radiocarbon dates of the human bones from this site obtained using a more robust purification method targeting the amino acid hydroxyproline. The data show that all the Neanderthal remains are from a much earlier period (>40,000 cal B.P.). These revised dates change our interpretation of this important site and demonstrate that the Vindija Neanderthals probably did not overlap temporally with early modern humans.

19 October 2022 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LSLaurits Skov
Laurits Skov
SPStéphane Peyrégne
Stéphane Peyrégne
DPDivyaratan Popli
Divyaratan Popli
LILeonardo N. M. Iasi
Leonardo N. M. Iasi
TDThibaut DEVIÈSE
Thibaut DEVIÈSE
BPBenjamin M. Peter
Benjamin M. Peter
Genomic analyses of Neanderthals have previously provided insights into their population history and relationship to modern humans1–8, but the social organization of Neanderthal communities remains poorly understood. Here we present genetic data for 13 Neanderthals from two Middle Palaeolithic sites in the Altai Mountains of southern Siberia: 11 from Chagyrskaya Cave9,10 and 2 from Okladnikov Cave11—making this one of the largest genetic studies of a Neanderthal population to date. We used hybridization capture to obtain genome-wide nuclear data, as well as mitochondrial and Y-chromosome sequences. Some Chagyrskaya individuals were closely related, including a father–daughter pair and a pair of second-degree relatives, indicating that at least some of the individuals lived at the same time. Up to one-third of these individuals’ genomes had long segments of homozygosity, suggesting that the Chagyrskaya Neanderthals were part of a small community. In addition, the Y-chromosome diversity is an order of magnitude lower than the mitochondrial diversity, a pattern that we found is best explained by female migration between communities. Thus, the genetic data presented here provide a detailed documentation of the social organization of an isolated Neanderthal community at the easternmost extent of their known range.