Lennart Edmark

Lennart Edmark

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Lennart Edmark

Centre for Clinical Research Västmanland, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Sweden

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2003 in Anesthesiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LELennart Edmark
Lennart Edmark
KKKamelia Kostova-Aherdan
Kamelia Kostova-Aherdan
MEMats Enlund
Mats Enlund
GHGöran Hedenstierna
Göran Hedenstierna
Background: The use of 100% oxygen during induction of anesthesia may produce atelectasis. The authors investigated how different oxygen concentrations affect the formation of atelectasis and the fall in arterial oxygen saturation during apnea. Methods: Thirty-six healthy, nonsmoking women were randomized to breathe 100, 80, or 60% oxygen for 5 min during the induction of general anesthesia. Ventilation was then withheld until the oxygen saturation, assessed by pulse oximetry, decreased to 90%. Atelectasis formation was studied with computed tomography. Results: Atelectasis in a transverse scan near the diaphragm after induction of anesthesia and apnea was 9.8 +/- 5.2 cm2 (5.6 +/- 3.4% of the total lung area; mean +/- SD), 1.3 +/- 1.2 cm2 (0.6 +/- 0.7%), and 0.3 +/- 0.3 cm2 (0.2 +/- 0.2%) in the groups breathing 100, 80, and 60% oxygen, respectively (P < 0.01). The corresponding times to reach 90% oxygen saturation were 411 +/- 84, 303 +/- 59, and 213 +/- 69 s, respectively (P < 0.01). Conclusion: During routine induction of general anesthesia, 80% oxygen for oxygenation caused minimal atelectasis, but the time margin before unacceptable desaturation occurred was significantly shortened compared with 100% oxygen.

1 June 2010 in Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GHGöran Hedenstierna
Göran Hedenstierna
LELennart Edmark
Lennart Edmark

16 August 2005 in Intensive Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GHGöran Hedenstierna
Göran Hedenstierna
LELennart Edmark
Lennart Edmark

1 September 2015 in Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GHGöran Hedenstierna
Göran Hedenstierna
LELennart Edmark
Lennart Edmark

29 October 2010 in Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LEL. Edmark
L. Edmark
UAU. Auner
U. Auner
MEMats Enlund
Mats Enlund
EÖE. Östberg
E. Östberg
GHG. Hedenstierna
G. Hedenstierna

1 June 2018 in Anesthesiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EÖErland Östberg
Erland Östberg
ATArnar Thorisson
Arnar Thorisson
MEMats Enlund
Mats Enlund
HZHenrik Zetterström
Henrik Zetterström
GHGöran Hedenstierna
Göran Hedenstierna
LELennart Edmark
Lennart Edmark
Background: Various methods for protective ventilation are increasingly being recommended for patients undergoing general anesthesia. However, the importance of each individual component is still unclear. In particular, the perioperative use of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) remains controversial. The authors tested the hypothesis that PEEP alone would be sufficient to limit atelectasis formation during nonabdominal surgery. Methods: This was a randomized controlled evaluator-blinded study. Twenty-four healthy patients undergoing general anesthesia were randomized to receive either mechanical ventilation with PEEP 7 or 9 cm H2O depending on body mass index (n = 12) or zero PEEP (n = 12). No recruitment maneuvers were used. The primary outcome was atelectasis area as studied by computed tomography in a transverse scan near the diaphragm, at the end of surgery, before emergence. Oxygenation was evaluated by measuring blood gases and calculating the ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to inspired oxygen fraction (Pao 2/Fio 2 ratio). Results: At the end of surgery, the median (range) atelectasis area, expressed as percentage of the total lung area, was 1.8 (0.3 to 9.9) in the PEEP group and 4.6 (1.0 to 10.2) in the zero PEEP group. The difference in medians was 2.8% (95% CI, 1.7 to 5.7%; P = 0.002). Oxygenation and carbon dioxide elimination were maintained in the PEEP group, but both deteriorated in the zero PEEP group. Conclusions: During nonabdominal surgery, adequate PEEP is sufficient to minimize atelectasis in healthy lungs and thereby maintain oxygenation. Thus, routine recruitment maneuvers seem unnecessary, and the authors suggest that they should only be utilized when clearly indicated.