Dave Thompson

Dave Thompson

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Dave Thompson

Sea Mammal Research Unit, Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Scotland, UK

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 June 2011 in Marine Mammal Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KKKit M. Kovacs
Kit M. Kovacs
AAAlex Aguilar
Alex Aguilar
DADavid Aurioles
David Aurioles
VBVladimir N. Burkanov
Vladimir N. Burkanov
CCClaudio Campagna
Claudio Campagna
FTFritz Trillmich
Fritz Trillmich

1 July 2014 in Current Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DRDeborah Russell
Deborah Russell
SBSophie M.J.M. Brasseur
Sophie M.J.M. Brasseur
DTDave Thompson
Dave Thompson
GHGordon D. Hastie
Gordon D. Hastie
VJVincent M. Janik
Vincent M. Janik
BMBernie McConnell
Bernie McConnell

1 March 2011 in Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DMD.J. McCafferty
D.J. McCafferty
CGCaroline Gilbert
Caroline Gilbert
WPW. Paterson
W. Paterson
PPP.P. Pomeroy
P.P. Pomeroy
DTD. Thompson
D. Thompson
AAA. Ancel
A. Ancel

23 May 2016 in Journal of Applied Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DRDeborah Russell
Deborah Russell
GHGordon D. Hastie
Gordon D. Hastie
DTDavid Thompson
David Thompson
VJVincent M. Janik
Vincent M. Janik
PHPhilip S. Hammond
Philip S. Hammond
BMBernie J. McConnell
Bernie J. McConnell
Summary: As part of global efforts to reduce dependence on carbon‐based energy sources there has been a rapid increase in the installation of renewable energy devices. The installation and operation of these devices can result in conflicts with wildlife. In the marine environment, mammals may avoid wind farms that are under construction or operating. Such avoidance may lead to more time spent travelling or displacement from key habitats. A paucity of data on at‐sea movements of marine mammals around wind farms limits our understanding of the nature of their potential impacts. Here, we present the results of a telemetry study on harbour sealsPhoca vitulinain The Wash, south‐east England, an area where wind farms are being constructed using impact pile driving. We investigated whether seals avoid wind farms during operation, construction in its entirety, or during piling activity. The study was carried out using historical telemetry data collected prior to any wind farm development and telemetry data collected in 2012 during the construction of one wind farm and the operation of another. Within an operational wind farm, there was a close‐to‐significant increase in seal usage compared to prior to wind farm development. However, the wind farm was at the edge of a large area of increased usage, so the presence of the wind farm was unlikely to be the cause. There was no significant displacement during construction as a whole. However, during piling, seal usage (abundance) was significantly reduced up to 25 km from the piling activity; within 25 km of the centre of the wind farm, there was a 19 to 83% (95% confidence intervals) decrease in usage compared to during breaks in piling, equating to a mean estimated displacement of 440 individuals. This amounts to significant displacement starting from predicted received levels of between 166 and 178 dB re 1 μPa(p‐p). Displacement was limited to piling activity; within 2 h of cessation of pile driving, seals were distributed as per the non‐piling scenario. Synthesis and applications. Our spatial and temporal quantification of avoidance of wind farms by harbour seals is critical to reduce uncertainty and increase robustness in environmental impact assessments of future developments. Specifically, the results will allow policymakers to produce industry guidance on the likelihood of displacement of seals in response to pile driving; the relationship between sound levels and avoidance rates; and the duration of any avoidance, thus allowing far more accurate environmental assessments to be carried out during the consenting process. Further, our results can be used to inform mitigation strategies in terms of both the sound levels likely to cause displacement and what temporal patterns of piling would minimize the magnitude of the energetic impacts of displacement.

15 October 2012 in Journal of Experimental Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PMPatrick Miller
Patrick Miller
MBMartin Biuw
Martin Biuw
YWYuuki Watanabe
Yuuki Watanabe
DTDave Thompson
Dave Thompson
MFMike A. Fedak
Mike A. Fedak
SUMMARY: Efficient locomotion between prey resources at depth and oxygen at the surface is crucial for breath-hold divers to maximize time spent in the foraging layer, and thereby net energy intake rates. The body density of divers, which changes with body condition, determines the apparent weight (buoyancy) of divers, which may affect round-trip cost-of-transport (COT) between the surface and depth. We evaluated alternative predictions from external-work and actuator-disc theory of how non-neutral buoyancy affects round-trip COT to depth, and the minimum COT speed for steady-state vertical transit. Not surprisingly, the models predict that one-way COT decreases (increases) when buoyancy aids (hinders) one-way transit. At extreme deviations from neutral buoyancy, gliding at terminal velocity is the minimum COT strategy in the direction aided by buoyancy. In the transit direction hindered by buoyancy, the external-work model predicted that minimum COT speeds would not change at greater deviations from neutral buoyancy, but minimum COT speeds were predicted to increase under the actuator disc model. As previously documented for grey seals, we found that vertical transit rates of 36 elephant seals increased in both directions as body density deviated from neutral buoyancy, indicating that actuator disc theory may more closely predict the power requirements of divers affected by gravity than an external work model. For both models, minor deviations from neutral buoyancy did not affect minimum COT speed or round-trip COT itself. However, at body-density extremes, both models predict that savings in the aided direction do not fully offset the increased COT imposed by the greater thrusting required in the hindered direction.

1 August 2007 in Animal Behaviour
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CSCarol E. Sparling
Carol E. Sparling
JGJean-Yves Georges
Jean-Yves Georges
SGSusan L. Gallon
Susan L. Gallon
MFMike Fedak
Mike Fedak
DTDave Thompson
Dave Thompson