Background: Untreated syphilis during pregnancy is associated with spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, prematurity and infant mortality. Syphilis may facilitate HIV transmission, which is especially concerning in low- and middle-income countries where both diseases are common. Methods: We performed an analysis of data available from NICHD/HPTN 040 (P1043), a study focused on the prevention of intrapartum HIV transmission to 1684 infants born to 1664 untreated HIV-infected women. This analysis evaluates risk factors and outcomes associated with a syphilis diagnosis in this cohort of HIV-infected women and their infants. Results: Approximately, 10% of women (n = 171) enrolled had serological evidence of syphilis without adequate treatment documented and 1.4% infants (n = 24) were dually HIV and syphilis infected. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that compared with HIV-infected women, co-infected women were significantly more likely to self-identify as non-white (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.5, 95% CI: 1.5–4.2), to consume alcohol during pregnancy (AOR 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1–2.1) and to transmit HIV to their infants (AOR 2.1, 95% CI: 1.3–3.4), with 88% of HIV infections being acquired in utero. As compared with HIV-infected or HIV-exposed infants, co-infected infants were significantly more likely to be born to mothers with venereal disease research laboratory titers ≥1:16 (AOR 3, 95% CI: 1.1–8.2) and higher viral loads (AOR 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1–1.9). Of 6 newborns with symptomatic syphilis, 2 expired shortly after birth, and 2 were HIV-infected. Conclusion: Syphilis continues to be a common co-infection in HIV-infected women and can facilitate in utero transmission of HIV to infants. Most infants are asymptomatic at birth, but those with symptoms have high mortality rates.

Background: Latin America comprises an extensive and diverse territory composed of 33 countries in the Caribbean, Central, and South America where Romance languages–languages derived from Latin are predominantly spoken. Economic disparities exist, with inequitable access to pediatric surgical care. The Latin American Surgical Outcomes Study in Pediatrics (LASOS‐Peds), a multi‐national collaboration, will determine safety of pediatric anesthesia and perioperative care.Objective: Below, we provide a descriptive initiative to share how pediatric anesthesia in Brazil, Chile, and Mexico operate. Theses descriptions do not represent all of Latin America.Descriptions and Conclusions: Brazil an upper middle‐income country, population 203 million, has a public system insufficiently resourced and a private system, resulting in inequitable safety and accessibility. Surgical complications constitute the third leading cause of mortality. Anesthesiology residency is 3 years, with required rotations in pediatric anesthesia; five hospitals offer pediatric anesthesia fellowships. Anesthesiology is a physician‐only practice. A Pediatric Anesthesia Committee within the Brazilian Society of Anesthesiology offers education through seasonal courses and workshops including pediatric advanced life support. Chile is a high‐income country, population 19.5 million, the majority cared for in the public system, the remainder in university, private, or military systems. Government efforts have gradually corrected the long‐standing anesthesiology shortage: twenty 3‐year residency programs prepare graduates for routine pediatric cases. The Chilean Society of Anesthesiology runs a 1‐month program for general anesthesiologists to enhance pediatric anesthesia skills. Pediatric anesthesia fellowship training occurs in Europe, USA, and Australia, or in two 2‐year Chilean university programs. Public health policies have increased the medical and surgical pediatric specialists and general anesthesiologists, but not pediatric anesthesiologists, which creates safety concerns for neonates, infants, and medically complex. Chile needs more pediatric anesthesia fellowship programs. Mexico, an upper middle‐income country, with a population of about 126 million, has a five‐sector healthcare system: public, social security for union workers, state for public employees, armed forces for the military, and a private “self‐pay.” There are inequities in safety and accessibility for children. Pediatric Anesthesiology fellowship is 2 years, after 3 years residency. A shortage of pediatric anesthesiologists limits accessibility and safety for surgical care, driven by added training at low salary and hospital under appreciation. The Mexican Society of Pediatric Anesthesiology conducts refresher courses, workshops, and case conferences. Insufficient resources and culture limits research.

Diversion of substances from the care of the intended patient is a significant problem in healthcare. Patients are harmed by the undertreatment of pain and suffering, transmission of disease, as well as the risk associated with impaired vigilance. Healthcare providers may be harmed by the physical and mental impact of their addictions. Healthcare systems are placed in jeopardy by the legal impact associated with illegal routes of drug release including sanction and financial liability and loss of public trust. Healthcare institutions have implemented many measures to reduce diversion from the perioperative area. These efforts include education, medical record surveillance, automated medication dispensing systems, urine drug testing, substance waste management systems, and drug diversion prevention teams. This narrative review evaluates strengths, weaknesses, and effectiveness of these systems and provides recommendations for leaders and care providers.

The prevalence of Substance Use Disorders (SUD) and acceptance of drug testing among anesthetists in Brazil has not been determined. An internet-based survey was performed to investigate the prevalence of SUD among anesthetists in Brazil, to explore the attitudes of anesthetists regarding whether SUD jeopardizes the health of an impaired provider or their patient, and to determine the provider’s perspective regarding acceptance and effectiveness of drug testing to reduce SUD. The questionnaire was distributed via social media. REDCap was utilized to capture data. A sample size of 350 to achieve a confidence level of 95% and confidence interval of 5 was estimated. Study report was based on STROBE and CHERRIES statements. The survey was returned from 1,295 individuals. Most individuals knew an anesthesia provider with a SUD (82.07%), while 23% admitted personal use. The most common identified substances of abuse were opioids (67.05%). Very few respondents worked in a setting that performs drug testing (n = 17, 1.33%). Most individuals believed that drug testing could improve personal safety (82.83%) or the safety of patients (85.41%). Individuals with a personal history of SUD were less likely to believe in the effectiveness of drug testing to reduce one’s own risk (74.92% vs. 85.18%, p < 0.0001) or improve the safety of patients (76.27% vs. 88.13%, p < 0.001). SUDs are common among anesthetists in Brazil. Drug testing would be accepted as a viable means to reduce the incidence although a larger study should be performed to investigate the logistical feasibility.

Introduction Surgery is a cost-effective public health intervention. Access to safe surgery is a basic human right. However, there are still significant disparities in the access to and safety of surgical and anaesthesia care between low-income and middle-income countries and high-income countries. The Latin American Surgical Outcomes Study in Paediatrics (LASOS-Peds) is an international, observational, 14-day cohort study to investigate the incidence of 30-day in-hospital complications following elective or emergency paediatric surgery in Latin American countries. Methods and analysis LASOS-Peds is a prospective, international, multicentre observational study of paediatric patients undergoing both elective and non-elective surgeries and procedures, inpatient and outpatient, including those performed outside the operating room. The primary outcome is the incidence of in-hospital postoperative complications up to 30 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes include intraoperative complications and the need for intensive care unit admission. Ethics and dissemination This study received approval from the Institutional Review Board of the coordinating centre (Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo) as well as from all the participating centres. The study results are expected to be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated at international conferences. Trial registration number NCT05934682.

Introduction: Lidocaine is widely used in pediatric anesthesia for airway topicalization to modulate undesirable airway and circulatory reflexes, yet its effectiveness remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to perform a meta‐analysis evaluating the impact of topical lidocaine on respiratory adverse events in children undergoing airway management. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for studies comparing topical lidocaine with placebo, no intervention, or intravenous lidocaine for pediatric airway management. Statistical analysis was performed using R (version 4.4.1). Odds ratios (ORs) were used for binary outcomes and mean differences for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) computed using a random‐effects model. Results: Fourteen randomized controlled trials comprising 1937 pediatric patients were included, of whom 917 (47%) received airway topicalization. In those receiving topical lidocaine, there was a significant reduction in the incidence of laryngospasm (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.95; p = 0.033), desaturation (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.98; p = 0.043), and sore throat (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.58; p < 0.001). However, no significant differences were observed for bronchospasm (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.11 to 2.35; p = 0.382), cough (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.28 to 1.11; p = 0.099), severe cough (OR 1.30; 95% CI 0.18 to 9.51; p = 0.793), hoarseness (OR 1.41; 95% CI 0.17 to 11.96; p = 0.754), vomiting (OR 1.95; 95% CI 0.47 to 7.99; p = 0.355), and heart rate (beats/min) (MD 0.08; 95% CI −6.31 to 6.47; p = 0.98). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that topical lidocaine may reduce the incidence of undesirable airway reflexes such as laryngospasm, desaturation, and sore throat in children undergoing airway management. However, its benefit for other perioperative respiratory adverse events requires further investigation, especially in high‐risk populations. Trial Registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024614863