David J. Beerling

David J. Beerling

Top Cited Scholar 2026
Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

David J. Beerling

Leverhulme Centre for Climate Change Mitigation, School of Biosciences University of Sheffield Sheffield UK

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 August 2017 in Nature Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HAHenry Adams
Henry Adams
MZMelanie J. B. Zeppel
Melanie J. B. Zeppel
WAWilliam R. L. Anderegg
William R. L. Anderegg
HHHenrik Hartmann
Henrik Hartmann
SLSimon M. Landhäusser
Simon M. Landhäusser
NMNate G. McDowell
Nate G. McDowell

12 December 2016 in Earth System Science Data
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMarielle Saunois
Marielle Saunois
PBPhilippe Bousquet
Philippe Bousquet
Benjamin PoulterBenjamin Poulter
Benjamin Poulter
APAnna Peregon
Anna Peregon
PCPhil Ciais
Phil Ciais
QZQiuan Zhu
Qiuan Zhu
The global methane (CH4) budget is becoming an increasingly important component for managing realistic pathways to mitigate climate change. This relevance, due to a shorter atmospheric lifetime and a stronger warming potential than carbon dioxide, is challenged by the still unexplained changes of atmospheric CH4 over the past decade. Emissions and concentrations of CH4 are continuing to increase, making CH4 the second most important human-induced greenhouse gas after carbon dioxide. Two major difficulties in reducing uncertainties come from the large variety of diffusive CH4 sources that overlap geographically, and from the destruction of CH4 by the very short-lived hydroxyl radical (OH). To address these difficulties, we have established a consortium of multi-disciplinary scientists under the umbrella of the Global Carbon Project to synthesize and stimulate research on the methane cycle, and producing regular (∼ biennial) updates of the global methane budget. This consortium includes atmospheric physicists and chemists, biogeochemists of surface and marine emissions, and socio-economists who study anthropogenic emissions. Following Kirschke et al. (2013), we propose here the first version of a living review paper that integrates results of top-down studies (exploiting atmospheric observations within an atmospheric inverse-modelling framework) and bottom-up models, inventories and data-driven approaches (including process-based models for estimating land surface emissions and atmospheric chemistry, and inventories for anthropogenic emissions, data-driven extrapolations). For the 2003–2012 decade, global methane emissions are estimated by top-down inversions at 558 Tg CH4 yr−1, range 540–568. About 60 % of global emissions are anthropogenic (range 50–65 %). Since 2010, the bottom-up global emission inventories have been closer to methane emissions in the most carbon-intensive Representative Concentrations Pathway (RCP8.5) and higher than all other RCP scenarios. Bottom-up approaches suggest larger global emissions (736 Tg CH4 yr−1, range 596–884) mostly because of larger natural emissions from individual sources such as inland waters, natural wetlands and geological sources. Considering the atmospheric constraints on the top-down budget, it is likely that some of the individual emissions reported by the bottom-up approaches are overestimated, leading to too large global emissions. Latitudinal data from top-down emissions indicate a predominance of tropical emissions (∼ 64 % of the global budget, < 30° N) as compared to mid (∼ 32 %, 30–60° N) and high northern latitudes (∼ 4 %, 60–90° N). Top-down inversions consistently infer lower emissions in China (∼ 58 Tg CH4 yr−1, range 51–72, −14 %) and higher emissions in Africa (86 Tg CH4 yr−1, range 73–108, +19 %) than bottom-up values used as prior estimates. Overall, uncertainties for anthropogenic emissions appear smaller than those from natural sources, and the uncertainties on source categories appear larger for top-down inversions than for bottom-up inventories and models. The most important source of uncertainty on the methane budget is attributable to emissions from wetland and other inland waters. We show that the wetland extent could contribute 30–40 % on the estimated range for wetland emissions. Other priorities for improving the methane budget include the following: (i) the development of process-based models for inland-water emissions, (ii) the intensification of methane observations at local scale (flux measurements) to constrain bottom-up land surface models, and at regional scale (surface networks and satellites) to constrain top-down inversions, (iii) improvements in the estimation of atmospheric loss by OH, and (iv) improvements of the transport models integrated in top-down inversions. The data presented here can be downloaded from the Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (http://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/GLOBAL_METHANE_BUDGET_2016_V1.1) and the Global Carbon Project.

23 June 2009 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PFPeter J. Franks
Peter J. Franks
DBDavid J. Beerling
David J. Beerling
Stomatal pores are microscopic structures on the epidermis of leaves formed by 2 specialized guard cells that control the exchange of water vapor and CO 2 between plants and the atmosphere. Stomatal size ( S ) and density ( D ) determine maximum leaf diffusive (stomatal) conductance of CO 2 ( g c max ) to sites of assimilation. Although large variations in D observed in the fossil record have been correlated with atmospheric CO 2 , the crucial significance of similarly large variations in S has been overlooked. Here, we use physical diffusion theory to explain why large changes in S necessarily accompanied the changes in D and atmospheric CO 2 over the last 400 million years. In particular, we show that high densities of small stomata are the only way to attain the highest g c max values required to counter CO 2 “starvation” at low atmospheric CO 2 concentrations. This explains cycles of increasing D and decreasing S evident in the fossil history of stomata under the CO 2 impoverished atmospheres of the Permo-Carboniferous and Cenozoic glaciations. The pattern was reversed under rising atmospheric CO 2 regimes. Selection for small S was crucial for attaining high g c max under falling atmospheric CO 2 and, therefore, may represent a mechanism linking CO 2 and the increasing gas-exchange capacity of land plants over geologic time.

1 October 2011 in Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NMNate G. McDowell
Nate G. McDowell
DBDavid J. Beerling
David J. Beerling
DBDavid D. Breshears
David D. Breshears
RFRosie A. Fisher
Rosie A. Fisher
KRKenneth F. Raffa
Kenneth F. Raffa
MSMark Stitt
Mark Stitt

31 October 2008 in The Open Atmospheric Science Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JHJames Hansen
James Hansen
MSMakiko Sato
Makiko Sato
PKPushker Kharecha
Pushker Kharecha
DBDavid Beerling
David Beerling
RBRobert Berner
Robert Berner
JZJames C. Zachos
James C. Zachos
Paleoclimate data show that climate sensitivity is ~3°C for doubled CO2, including only fast feedback processes. Equilibrium sensitivity, including slower surface albedo feedbacks, is ~6°C for doubled CO2 for the range of climate states between glacial conditions and ice-free Antarctica. Decreasing CO was the main cause of a cooling trend that began 50 million years ago, the planet being nearly ice-free until CO fell to 450 ± 100 ppm; barring prompt policy changes, that critical level will be passed, in the opposite direction, within decades. If humanity wishes to preserve a planet similar to that on which civilization developed and to which life on Earth is adapted, paleoclimate evidence and ongoing climate change suggest that CO2 will need to be reduced from its current 385 ppm to at most 350 ppm, but likely less than that. The largest uncertainty in the target arises from possible changes of non-CO2 forcings. An initial 350 ppm CO2 target may be achievable by phasing out coal use except where CO2 is captured and adopting agricultural and forestry practices that sequester carbon. If the present overshoot of this target CO2 is not brief, there is a possibility of seeding irreversible catastrophic effects.

8 July 2020 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DBDavid J. Beerling
David J. Beerling
EKEuripides P. Kantzas
Euripides P. Kantzas
MLMark R. Lomas
Mark R. Lomas
PWPeter Wade
Peter Wade
RERafael M. Eufrasio
Rafael M. Eufrasio
SBSteven Banwart
Steven Banwart