James T. Randerson

James T. Randerson

Top Cited Scholar 2026
Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

James T. Randerson

University of California, Irvine

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 December 2019 in Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DLDavid M. Lawrence
David M. Lawrence
RFRosie A. Fisher
Rosie A. Fisher
CKCharles D. Koven
Charles D. Koven
KOKeith W. Oleson
Keith W. Oleson
SSSean C. Swenson
Sean C. Swenson
Xubin ZengXubin Zeng
Xubin Zeng
The Community Land Model (CLM) is the land component of the Community Earth System Model (CESM) and is used in several global and regional modeling systems. In this paper, we introduce model developments included in CLM version 5 (CLM5), which is the default land component for CESM2. We assess an ensemble of simulations, including prescribed and prognostic vegetation state, multiple forcing data sets, and CLM4, CLM4.5, and CLM5, against a range of metrics including from the International Land Model Benchmarking (ILAMBv2) package. CLM5 includes new and updated processes and parameterizations: (1) dynamic land units, (2) updated parameterizations and structure for hydrology and snow (spatially explicit soil depth, dry surface layer, revised groundwater scheme, revised canopy interception and canopy snow processes, updated fresh snow density, simple firn model, and Model for Scale Adaptive River Transport), (3) plant hydraulics and hydraulic redistribution, (4) revised nitrogen cycling (flexible leaf stoichiometry, leaf N optimization for photosynthesis, and carbon costs for plant nitrogen uptake), (5) global crop model with six crop types and time‐evolving irrigated areas and fertilization rates, (6) updated urban building energy, (7) carbon isotopes, and (8) updated stomatal physiology. New optional features include demographically structured dynamic vegetation model (Functionally Assembled Terrestrial Ecosystem Simulator), ozone damage to plants, and fire trace gas emissions coupling to the atmosphere. Conclusive establishment of improvement or degradation of individual variables or metrics is challenged by forcing uncertainty, parametric uncertainty, and model structural complexity, but the multivariate metrics presented here suggest a general broad improvement from CLM4 to CLM5.

30 June 2017 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NAN. Andela
N. Andela
DMDouglas Morton
Douglas Morton
LGLouis Giglio
Louis Giglio
YCYang Chen
Yang Chen
GWG. R. van der Werf
G. R. van der Werf
JRJ. T. Randerson
J. T. Randerson
Burn less, baby, burn less: Humans have, and always have had, a major impact on wildfire activity, which is expected to increase in our warming world. Andela et al. use satellite data to show that, unexpectedly, global burned area declined by ∼25% over the past 18 years, despite the influence of climate. The decrease has been largest in savannas and grasslands because of agricultural expansion and intensification. The decline of burned area has consequences for predictions of future changes to the atmosphere, vegetation, and the terrestrial carbon sink. Science , this issue p. 1356

11 December 2012 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JRJ. T. Randerson
J. T. Randerson
YCYang Chen
Yang Chen
GWG. R. van der Werf
G. R. van der Werf
BRB. M. Rogers
B. M. Rogers
DMD. C. Morton
D. C. Morton
In several biomes, including croplands, wooded savannas, and tropical forests, many small fires occur each year that are well below the detection limit of the current generation of global burned area products derived from moderate resolution surface reflectance imagery. Although these fires often generate thermal anomalies that can be detected by satellites, their contributions to burned area and carbon fluxes have not been systematically quantified across different regions and continents. Here we developed a preliminary method for combining 1‐km thermal anomalies (active fires) and 500 m burned area observations from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) to estimate the influence of these fires. In our approach, we calculated the number of active fires inside and outside of 500 m burn scars derived from reflectance data. We estimated small fire burned area by computing the difference normalized burn ratio (dNBR) for these two sets of active fires and then combining these observations with other information. In a final step, we used the Global Fire Emissions Database version 3 (GFED3) biogeochemical model to estimate the impact of these fires on biomass burning emissions. We found that the spatial distribution of active fires and 500 m burned areas were in close agreement in ecosystems that experience large fires, including savannas across southern Africa and Australia and boreal forests in North America and Eurasia. In other areas, however, we observed many active fires outside of burned area perimeters. Fire radiative power was lower for this class of active fires. Small fires substantially increased burned area in several continental‐scale regions, including Equatorial Asia (157%), Central America (143%), and Southeast Asia (90%) during 2001–2010. Globally, accounting for small fires increased total burned area by approximately by 35%, from 345 Mha/yr to 464 Mha/yr. A formal quantification of uncertainties was not possible, but sensitivity analyses of key model parameters caused estimates of global burned area increases from small fires to vary between 24% and 54%. Biomass burning carbon emissions increased by 35% at a global scale when small fires were included in GFED3, from 1.9 Pg C/yr to 2.5 Pg C/yr. The contribution of tropical forest fires to year‐to‐year variability in carbon fluxes increased because small fires amplified emissions from Central America, South America and Southeast Asia—regions where drought stress and burned area varied considerably from year to year in response to El Nino‐Southern Oscillation and other climate modes.

30 March 2020 in Nature Climate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CDC. Deser
C. Deser
FLF. Lehner
F. Lehner
KRK. B. Rodgers
K. B. Rodgers
TAT. Ault
T. Ault
TDT. L. Delworth
T. L. Delworth
MTM. Ting
M. Ting

17 November 2006 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JRJ. T. Randerson
J. T. Randerson
HLH. Liu
H. Liu
MFM. G. Flanner
M. G. Flanner
SCScott Chambers
Scott Chambers
YJY. Jin
Y. Jin
CZC. S. Zender
C. S. Zender
We report measurements and analysis of a boreal forest fire, integrating the effects of greenhouse gases, aerosols, black carbon deposition on snow and sea ice, and postfire changes in surface albedo. The net effect of all agents was to increase radiative forcing during the first year (34 ± 31 Watts per square meter of burned area), but to decrease radiative forcing when averaged over an 80-year fire cycle (–2.3 ± 2.2 Watts per square meter) because multidecadal increases in surface albedo had a larger impact than fire-emitted greenhouse gases. This result implies that future increases in boreal fire may not accelerate climate warming.

19 June 2020 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WAWilliam R. L. Anderegg
William R. L. Anderegg
ATAnna Trugman
Anna Trugman
GBGrayson Badgley
Grayson Badgley
CAChrista M. Anderson
Christa M. Anderson
ABAnn Bartuska
Ann Bartuska
JRJames T. Randerson
James T. Randerson
Risks to mitigation potential of forests: Much recent attention has focused on the potential of trees and forests to mitigate ongoing climate change by acting as sinks for carbon. Anderegg et al. review the growing evidence that forests' climate mitigation potential is increasingly at risk from a range of adversities that limit forest growth and health. These include physical factors such as drought and fire and biotic factors, including the depredations of insect herbivores and fungal pathogens. Full assessment and quantification of these risks, which themselves are influenced by climate, is key to achieving science-based policy outcomes for effective land and forest management. Science , this issue p. eaaz7005