Bram Bastiaan Zandbelt

Bram Bastiaan Zandbelt

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Bram Bastiaan Zandbelt

Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 November 2010 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BZBram B. Zandbelt
Bram B. Zandbelt
MVMatthijs Vink
Matthijs Vink
Stopping a manual response requires suppression of the primary motor cortex (M1) and has been linked to activation of the striatum. Here, we test three hypotheses regarding the role of the striatum in stopping: striatum activation during successful stopping may reflect suppression of M1, anticipation of a stop-signal occurring, or a slower response build-up. Twenty-four healthy volunteers underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while performing a stop-signal paradigm, in which anticipation of stopping was manipulated using a visual cue indicating stop-signal probability, with their right hand. We observed activation of the striatum and deactivation of left M1 during successful versus unsuccessful stopping. In addition, striatum activation was proportional to the degree of left M1 deactivation during successful stopping, implicating the striatum in response suppression. Furthermore, striatum activation increased as a function of stop-signal probability and was to linked to activation in the supplementary motor complex (SMC) and right inferior frontal cortex (rIFC) during successful stopping, suggesting a role in anticipation of stopping. Finally, trial-to-trial variations in response time did not affect striatum activation. The results identify the striatum as a critical node in the neural network associated with stopping motor responses. As striatum activation was related to both suppression of M1 and anticipation of a stop-signal occurring, these findings suggest that the striatum is involved in proactive inhibitory control over M1, most likely in interaction with SMC and rIFC.

22 February 2012 in Human Brain Mapping
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BZBram B. Zandbelt
Bram B. Zandbelt
MBMirjam Bloemendaal
Mirjam Bloemendaal
SNSebastiaan F.W. Neggers
Sebastiaan F.W. Neggers
RKRené S. Kahn
René S. Kahn
MVMatthijs Vink
Matthijs Vink


1 December 2011 in Biological Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BZBram B. Zandbelt
Bram B. Zandbelt
MBMariët van Buuren
Mariët van Buuren
RKRené S. Kahn
René S. Kahn
MVMatthijs Vink
Matthijs Vink

1 July 2007 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRM. Raemaekers
M. Raemaekers
MVM. Vink
M. Vink
BZB. Zandbelt
B. Zandbelt
RWR.J.A. van Wezel
R.J.A. van Wezel
RKR.S. Kahn
R.S. Kahn
NRN.F. Ramsey
N.F. Ramsey

29 January 2009 in Human Brain Mapping
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMariët van Buuren
Mariët van Buuren
TGThomas E. Gladwin
Thomas E. Gladwin
BZBram B. Zandbelt
Bram B. Zandbelt
Michael van den HeuvelMichael van den Heuvel
Michael van den Heuvel
NRNick F. Ramsey
Nick F. Ramsey
MVMatthijs Vink
Matthijs Vink