Aaron P. Ragsdale

Aaron P. Ragsdale

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Aaron P. Ragsdale

Department of Integrative Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA, 53706

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 December 2021 in Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FBFranz Baumdicker
Franz Baumdicker
GBGertjan Bisschop
Gertjan Bisschop
DGDaniel Goldstein
Daniel Goldstein
GGGraham Gower
Graham Gower
ARAaron P Ragsdale
Aaron P Ragsdale
JKJerome Kelleher
Jerome Kelleher
Stochastic simulation is a key tool in population genetics, since the models involved are often analytically intractable and simulation is usually the only way of obtaining ground-truth data to evaluate inferences. Because of this, a large number of specialized simulation programs have been developed, each filling a particular niche, but with largely overlapping functionality and a substantial duplication of effort. Here, we introduce msprime version 1.0, which efficiently implements ancestry and mutation simulations based on the succinct tree sequence data structure and the tskit library. We summarize msprime’s many features, and show that its performance is excellent, often many times faster and more memory efficient than specialized alternatives. These high-performance features have been thoroughly tested and validated, and built using a collaborative, open source development model, which reduces duplication of effort and promotes software quality via community engagement.

23 June 2020 in eLife
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JAJeffrey R Adrion
Jeffrey R Adrion
CCChristopher B Cole
Christopher B Cole
NDNoah Dukler
Noah Dukler
JGJared G Galloway
Jared G Galloway
AGAriella L Gladstein
Ariella L Gladstein
AKAndrew D Kern
Andrew D Kern
The explosion in population genomic data demands ever more complex modes of analysis, and increasingly, these analyses depend on sophisticated simulations. Recent advances in population genetic simulation have made it possible to simulate large and complex models, but specifying such models for a particular simulation engine remains a difficult and error-prone task. Computational genetics researchers currently re-implement simulation models independently, leading to inconsistency and duplication of effort. This situation presents a major barrier to empirical researchers seeking to use simulations for power analyses of upcoming studies or sanity checks on existing genomic data. Population genetics, as a field, also lacks standard benchmarks by which new tools for inference might be measured. Here, we describe a new resource, stdpopsim, that attempts to rectify this situation. Stdpopsim is a community-driven open source project, which provides easy access to a growing catalog of published simulation models from a range of organisms and supports multiple simulation engine backends. This resource is available as a well-documented python library with a simple command-line interface. We share some examples demonstrating how stdpopsim can be used to systematically compare demographic inference methods, and we encourage a broader community of developers to contribute to this growing resource.

10 June 2019 in PLOS Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ARAaron P Ragsdale
Aaron P Ragsdale
SGSimon Gravel
Simon Gravel
We learn about population history and underlying evolutionary biology through patterns of genetic polymorphism. Many approaches to reconstruct evolutionary histories focus on a limited number of informative statistics describing distributions of allele frequencies or patterns of linkage disequilibrium. We show that many commonly used statistics are part of a broad family of two-locus moments whose expectation can be computed jointly and rapidly under a wide range of scenarios, including complex multi-population demographies with continuous migration and admixture events. A full inspection of these statistics reveals that widely used models of human history fail to predict simple patterns of linkage disequilibrium. To jointly capture the information contained in classical and novel statistics, we implemented a tractable likelihood-based inference framework for demographic history. Using this approach, we show that human evolutionary models that include archaic admixture in Africa, Asia, and Europe provide a much better description of patterns of genetic diversity across the human genome. We estimate that an unidentified, deeply diverged population admixed with modern humans within Africa both before and after the split of African and Eurasian populations, contributing 4 − 8% genetic ancestry to individuals in world-wide populations. Throughout human history, populations have expanded and contracted, split and merged, and exchanged migrants. Because these events affected genetic diversity, we can learn about human history by comparing predictions from evolutionary models to genetic data. Here, we show how to rapidly compute such predictions for a wide range of diversity measures within and across populations under complex demographic scenarios. While widely used models of human history accurately predict common measures of diversity, we show that they strongly underestimate the co-occurence of low frequency mutations within human populations in Asia, Europe, and Africa. Models allowing for archaic admixture, the relatively recent mixing of human populations with deeply diverged human lineages, resolve this discrepancy. We use such models to infer demographic models that include both recent and ancient features of human history. We recover the well-characterized admixture of Neanderthals in Eurasian populations, as well as admixture from an as-yet unknown diverged human population within Africa, further suggesting that admixture with deeply diverged lineages occurred multiple times in human history. By simultaneously testing model predictions for a broad range of diversity statistics, we can assess the robustness of common evolutionary models, identify missing historical events, and build more informed models of human demography.

5 May 2020 in PLOS Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DNDominic Nelson
Dominic Nelson
JKJerome Kelleher
Jerome Kelleher
ARAaron P. Ragsdale
Aaron P. Ragsdale
CMClaudia Moreau
Claudia Moreau
GMGil McVean
Gil McVean
SGSimon Gravel
Simon Gravel
Coalescent simulations are widely used to examine the effects of evolution and demographic history on the genetic makeup of populations. Thanks to recent progress in algorithms and data structures, simulators such as the widely-used msprime now provide genome-wide simulations for millions of individuals. However, this software relies on classic coalescent theory and its assumptions that sample sizes are small and that the region being simulated is short. Here we show that coalescent simulations of long regions of the genome exhibit large biases in identity-by-descent (IBD), long-range linkage disequilibrium (LD), and ancestry patterns, particularly when the sample size is large. We present a Wright-Fisher extension to msprime, and show that it produces more realistic distributions of IBD, LD, and ancestry proportions, while also addressing more subtle biases of the coalescent. Further, these extensions are more computationally efficient than state-of-the-art coalescent simulations when simulating long regions, including whole-genome data. For shorter regions, efficiency can be maintained via a hybrid model which simulates the recent past under the Wright-Fisher model and uses coalescent simulations in the distant past. Coalescent theory has provided deep theoretical insight into patterns of human diversity. Implementations of coalescent models in simulation software such as ms have further provided tools to interpret thousands of genomic studies. Recent technical progress has allowed for a dramatic increase in the scale at which genomes can be both measured and simulated, opening up opportunities for a finer understanding of evolutionary biology. However, we show that coalescent simulations of long regions of the genome exhibit large biases in sample relatedness, distorting haplotype sharing and ancestry patterns in simulated cohorts. We trace these biases to basic assumptions of the coalescent model, and show how the assumptions can be relaxed to provide a better description of the observed patterns of genetic polymorphism at a fraction of the computational cost.

30 April 2021 in Molecular Biology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Alex McAlvayAlex McAlvay
Alex McAlvay
ARAaron P Ragsdale
Aaron P Ragsdale
MMMakenzie E Mabry
Makenzie E Mabry
XQXinshuai Qi
Xinshuai Qi
KBKevin A Bird
Kevin A Bird
EEEve Emshwiller
Eve Emshwiller
The study of domestication contributes to our knowledge of evolution and crop genetic resources. Human selection has shaped wild Brassica rapa into diverse turnip, leafy, and oilseed crops. Despite its worldwide economic importance and potential as a model for understanding diversification under domestication, insights into the number of domestication events and initial crop(s) domesticated in B. rapa have been limited due to a lack of clarity about the wild or feral status of conspecific noncrop relatives. To address this gap and reconstruct the domestication history of B. rapa, we analyzed 68,468 genotyping-by-sequencing-derived single nucleotide polymorphisms for 416 samples in the largest diversity panel of domesticated and weedy B. rapa to date. To further understand the center of origin, we modeled the potential range of wild B. rapa during the mid-Holocene. Our analyses of genetic diversity across B. rapa morphotypes suggest that noncrop samples from the Caucasus, Siberia, and Italy may be truly wild, whereas those occurring in the Americas and much of Europe are feral. Clustering, tree-based analyses, and parameterized demographic inference further indicate that turnips were likely the first crop type domesticated, from which leafy types in East Asia and Europe were selected from distinct lineages. These findings clarify the domestication history and nature of wild crop genetic resources for B. rapa, which provides the first step toward investigating cases of possible parallel selection, the domestication and feralization syndrome, and novel germplasm for Brassica crop improvement.

29 September 2022 in Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GGGraham Gower
Graham Gower
ARAaron P Ragsdale
Aaron P Ragsdale
GBGertjan Bisschop
Gertjan Bisschop
RGRyan N Gutenkunst
Ryan N Gutenkunst
MHMatthew Hartfield
Matthew Hartfield
KTKevin R Thornton
Kevin R Thornton
Understanding the demographic history of populations is a key goal in population genetics, and with improving methods and data, ever more complex models are being proposed and tested. Demographic models of current interest typically consist of a set of discrete populations, their sizes and growth rates, and continuous and pulse migrations between those populations over a number of epochs, which can require dozens of parameters to fully describe. There is currently no standard format to define such models, significantly hampering progress in the field. In particular, the important task of translating the model descriptions in published work into input suitable for population genetic simulators is labor intensive and error prone. We propose the Demes data model and file format, built on widely used technologies, to alleviate these issues. Demes provide a well-defined and unambiguous model of populations and their properties that is straightforward to implement in software, and a text file format that is designed for simplicity and clarity. We provide thoroughly tested implementations of Demes parsers in multiple languages including Python and C, and showcase initial support in several simulators and inference methods. An introduction to the file format and a detailed specification are available at https://popsim-consortium.github.io/demes-spec-docs/.