Neonatal sepsis is the third leading cause of neonatal mortality and a major public health problem, especially in developing countries. Although recent medical advances have improved neonatal care, many challenges remain in the diagnosis and management of neonatal infections. The diagnosis of neonatal sepsis is complicated by the frequent presence of noninfectious conditions that resemble sepsis, especially in preterm infants, and by the absence of optimal diagnostic tests. Since neonatal sepsis is a high-risk disease, especially in preterm infants, clinicians are compelled to empirically administer antibiotics to infants with risk factors and/or signs of suspected sepsis. Unfortunately, both broad-spectrum antibiotics and prolonged treatment with empirical antibiotics are associated with adverse outcomes and increase antimicrobial resistance rates. Given the high incidence and mortality of sepsis in preterm infants and its long-term consequences on growth and development, efforts to reduce the rates of infection in this vulnerable population are one of the most important interventions in neonatal care. In this review, we discuss the most common questions and challenges in the diagnosis and management of neonatal sepsis, with a focus on developing countries.

Background: Lactoferrin (LF) is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial and immunomodulatory milk glycoprotein. Objective: To determine the effect of bovine LF on the prevention of the first episode of late-onset sepsis in Peruvian infants. Methods: We conducted a pilot randomized placebo-controlled double blind study in infants with a birth weight (BW) less than 2500g in 3 Neonatal Units in Lima. Patients were randomized to receive bovine LF 200mg/kg/d or placebo for 4 weeks. Results: One hundred and ninety neonates with a BW of 1591 ± 408 g and a gestational age of 32.1 ± 2.6 weeks were enrolled. Overall, 33 clinically defined first late-onset sepsis events occurred. The cumulative sepsis incidence in the LF group was 12/95 (12.6%) versus 21/95 (22.1%) in the placebo group, and 20% (8/40) versus 37.5% (15/40) for infants less than or equal to 1500 g. The hazard ratio of LF, after adjustment by BW, was 0.507 (95% CI: 0.249–1.034). There were 4 episodes of culture-proven sepsis in the LF group versus 4 in the placebo group. Considering that children did not received the intervention until the start of oral or tube feeding, we ran a secondary exploratory analysis using time since the start of the treatment; in this model, LF achieved significance. There were no serious adverse events attributable to the intervention. Conclusions: Overall sepsis occurred less frequently in the LF group than in the control group. Although the primary outcome did not reach statistical significance, the confidence interval is suggestive of an effect that justifies a larger trial.