(1) Background: Influenza is a viral infection that has claimed many millions of lives over the past 100 years, and there is always a risk that a new influenza virus will emerge and cause another pandemic. One way to reduce such a potential new influenza virus will be heat inactivation. The question in this study is how much the heat sensitivities of previous influenza viruses differ. If they are very similar, it is expected that a new influenza virus can be inactivated with the same heat parameters as previous influenza viruses. (2) Methods: Through a literature search, published heat inactivation results are compiled and analyzed using Arrhenius models and regression equations for decimal reduction times for different temperatures and media determined. (3) Results: There are about 50 studies on heat inactivation of human and avian influenza viruses so far, showing large differences in heat sensitivity of influenza viruses in different media. However, within a single medium the differences between viruses are rather small. (4) Conclusions: At a temperature of 60 °C, previous influenza viruses can be reduced by 4 or more orders of magnitude within approximately 30 min in almost all media, and this is likely to be true for a potential new influenza virus. Further studies, especially on human influenza viruses, would be desirable.

(1) Background: Applications using touch screens are increasingly deployed in medical facilities, as well as in public areas. When touching the display with fingers, potentially pathogenic microorganisms such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can be transmitted. An automated process to decontaminate the device in between users would be highly useful. (2) Methods: Thin glass plates were superficially contaminated with the non-pathogenic Staphylococcus carnosus in a controlled manner. Subsequently, UVA radiation of 400 or 380 nm was laterally coupled into the glass plate, which acted as a light guide. Contact agar plates recorded the change in the staphylococci concentration over time. Additionally, the UVA radiation emitted by the glass plates was measured and the potential risk to humans assessed. (3) Results: Staphylococci concentration decreased as a result of UVA radiation for both wavelengths. At 400 nm, it took about 7.5 h and at 380 nm about 1 h until a reduction of 90% was reached. To meet higher disinfection requirements, disproportionately longer irradiation times were necessary. The potential UVA irradiation of humans in front of the glass pane was about 35 µW/cm² or less and posed no risk to humans. (4) Conclusions: Side-coupled UVA radiation is in principle capable of safely automatically disinfecting microorganisms on touch screens. However, the required irradiation times are still in the hour range, so that a rapid disinfection within a minute or less is not yet possible with the presented setup. However, higher UVA intensities might reduce the current disinfection durations.

(1) Background: Far-UVC radiation in the spectral range 200–230 nm has, according to previous findings, a strong antimicrobial effect on pathogens, but exhibits hardly any harmful effect on human skin. Therefore, the present study will discuss whether such radiation could also be suitable for hand disinfection in the healthcare sector. (2) Methods: Hands and gloves were microbially contaminated and exposed to radiation from a 222 nm krypton-chloride-excimer lamp. The applied doses were 23 mJ/cm² and 100 mJ/cm², respectively. Irradiated and non-irradiated hands and gloves were pressed onto agar plates and colonies were counted and compared after 24 h of incubation. For comparison, we also treated hands and gloves with a commercial liquid alcohol-based disinfectant. (3) Results: On the hand, the 23 mJ/cm² resulted in the reduction of the observed colonies on the agar plates by one log level. For the gloves irradiated with 100 mJ/cm², a colony reduction of 1.3 log levels was recorded. In the comparative experiments with the commercial disinfectant, a colony reduction of 1.9 and approximately one log level was observed on hand and gloves, respectively. (4) Conclusion: In both cases, far-UVC radiation provided a considerable reduction in microorganisms. However, compared to published far-UVC irradiation results in suspensions, the disinfection success on hands and gloves was rather low. With regard to the irradiation limits currently existing in the European Union, multiple daily hand disinfection with far-UVC radiation is actually legally not possible at present, but the thresholds are currently under discussion and could change in the future. Far-UVC disinfection of hands in gloves seems theoretically possible if attention is paid to potential perforations in the gloves.

Touch Screens are commonly contaminated with staphylococci and other pathogens and can therefore lead to the spread of infections both in the medical environment and in everyday life. Therefore, the feasibility study presented here aims to investigate whether touch screens could be disinfected automatically and quickly in the future by applying Far-UVC radiation, which is known for its strong antimicrobial impact despite its low hazard to humans. The study was carried out on staphylococci on a small quartz pane as a simplified touch screen model. In one setup, the 236 nm Far-UVC-LEDs radiation was coupled laterally into the quartz plate. For comparison, the staphylococci were also irradiated from the top by these Far-UVC-LEDs in another setup. In both approaches, the bacteria were reduced by about 90% within approximately 5 seconds. Hence, the approach with side-mounted Far-UVC-LEDs in particular appears to be a realistic possibility for the future automated disinfection of touch screens if the performance and lifetime of Far-UVC-LEDs continue to improve.

The contamination of surfaces by antibiotic-resistant pathogens presents an escalating challenge, especially on touchscreens in public settings such as hospitals, airports, and means of transport. Traditional chemical cleaning agents are often ineffective and leave behind harmful residues. Thus, the application of optical radiation is gaining relevance as a rapid, effective, and environmentally friendly disinfection method. This study examines the contamination of publicly accessible touchscreens and the efficacy of an irradiation approach for the radiation disinfection of microorganisms on quartz surfaces with UVC LEDs. In this setup, the LED radiation is laterally coupled into a quartz plate that serves as cover glass of a simplified touchscreen model. The process allows for the irradiation of microorganisms on the surface, without the user being exposed to hazardous radiation. To assess the efficacy of the disinfection process, a range of bacteria, mostly ESKAPE surrogates, such as Staphylococcus carnosus, Acinetobacter kookii, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus mundtii, and additionally Micrococcus luteus, were spread over a quartz plate with a homebuilt nebulization system. After operating the side-mounted LEDs for 30 s, a reduction in all bacteria except M. luteus by more than three orders of magnitude was observed. In the case of M. luteus, a significant reduction was achieved after 60 s (p < 0.05). This result demonstrates the potential of side-mounted UVC LEDs for rapid disinfection of touchscreens between two users and thus for reducing the spread of pathogens without irradiating humans.

Background and Objectives: The cornea protects the eye from external influences and contributes to its refractive power. Corneas belong to the most frequently transplanted tissues, providing a last resort for preserving the patient’s vision. There is a high demand for donor corneas worldwide, but almost 4% of these transplants are not eligible due to microbial contamination. The objective of this study is to ascertain the suitability of 222 nm Far-UVC irradiation for the decontamination of corneas without damaging corneal endothelial cells. Materials and Methods: To assess the destructive effect of irradiation and, thus, identify the applicable dose needed to decontaminate the cornea without interfering with its integrity, 141 porcine corneas were irradiated with 0, 60 or 150 mJ/cm² at 222 nm. In the second step, a series of 13 human corneas were subjected to half-sided irradiation using 15 or 60 mJ/cm² at 222 nm. After five days of in vitro culturing, the endothelial cell density of the non-irradiated area of each human cornea was compared to the irradiated area. Results: Irradiation with up to 60 mJ/cm² had no detectably significant effect on the cell integrity of human corneas (p = 0.764), with only a minimal reduction in cell density of 3.7% observed. These findings were partially corroborated by tests on porcine corneas, wherein the variability between test groups was consistent, even at increased irradiation doses of up to 150 mJ/cm², and no notable effects on the irradiated porcine endothelium were monitored. The efficacy of the antimicrobial treatment was evident in the disinfection tests conducted on corneas. Conclusions: These initial irradiation experiments demonstrated that 222 nm Far-UVC radiation has the potential to decontaminate the cornea without compromising sensitive endothelial cell viability.