Sompop Bencharit

Dr. Sompop Bencharit

Reconstructive & Rehabilitation Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, Illinois, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2020 in The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MYMatthew Yeung
Matthew Yeung
AAAous Abdulmajeed
Aous Abdulmajeed
CCCaroline K. Carrico
Caroline K. Carrico
GDGeorge R. Deeb
George R. Deeb
Sompop BencharitSompop Bencharit
Sompop Bencharit

1 July 2018 in Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Sompop BencharitSompop Bencharit
Sompop Bencharit
ASAdam Staffen
Adam Staffen
MYMatthew Yeung
Matthew Yeung
DWDaniel Whitley
Daniel Whitley
DLDaniel M. Laskin
Daniel M. Laskin
GDGeorge R. Deeb
George R. Deeb

29 May 2019 in European Journal of Dental Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JDJanina Golob Deeb
Janina Golob Deeb
Sompop BencharitSompop Bencharit
Sompop Bencharit
CCCaroline K. Carrico
Caroline K. Carrico
MLMarija Lukic
Marija Lukic
DHDaniel Hawkins
Daniel Hawkins
GDGeorge R. Deeb
George R. Deeb

1 September 2017 in The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DWDaniel Whitley
Daniel Whitley
RER. Scott Eidson
R. Scott Eidson
IRIvan Rudek
Ivan Rudek
Sompop BencharitSompop Bencharit
Sompop Bencharit

17 December 2024 in Journal of Dental Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SFSzabolcs Felszeghy
Szabolcs Felszeghy
MMMurat Mutluay
Murat Mutluay
Mikko LiukkonenMikko Liukkonen
Mikko Liukkonen
NFNicla Flacco
Nicla Flacco
MBMahmoud M. Bakr
Mahmoud M. Bakr
Barry F.A. QuinnBarry F.A. Quinn
Barry F.A. Quinn
Background: Haptics‐enhanced virtual reality (VR‐haptic) simulation in dental education has evolved considerably during the past decade, representing a promising resource of simulation‐based training opportunities to support conventional practice. We aim to summarize current literature on the applications of VR‐haptics in learning, practicing, and teaching dental education.Methods: A literature search was performed using PubMed, focusing on research articles published between January 2010 and January 2024. Out of the 667 articles that matched the search terms (dentistry, education, haptic, teaching, training, virtual reality), 105 were screened, and 42 were eligible for full‐text reading and utilization. Findings from an ongoing educator survey on the use of VR‐haptics in dental education have also been provided.Results: VR‐haptic simulation has been shown to have a supportive role in dental simulation practice. Despite training within a digital world, hand skill transfer to the real world has been demonstrated, which affords educators more flexibility in how to train their students before and during traditional preclinical and clinical practical education. The individualized VR‐haptic training and feedback help students in mastering essential working techniques, while also increasing engagement and motivation.Conclusions: VR‐haptics‐supported dental education can help students effectively address challenges during their preclinical and clinical training, as well as in their subsequent careers, and it may help mitigate some weaknesses of the current educational system. Validation is a key factor for the acceptance of VR‐haptic simulators; thus, further research and verification are needed before VR‐haptics could be considered a primary hand skill development method of learning in dental education. VR‐haptic simulation may in the future be used as an assessment tool for the students’ and clinicians’ credentialing process.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PTPrakan Thanasrisuebwong
Prakan Thanasrisuebwong
RSRudee Surarit
Rudee Surarit
Sompop BencharitSompop Bencharit
Sompop Bencharit
NRNisarat Ruangsawasdi
Nisarat Ruangsawasdi
Injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) has been used as an autografting material to enhance bone regeneration through intrinsic growth factors. However, fractionation protocols used to prepare i-PRF can be varied and the effects of different fractionation protocols are not known. In this study, we investigated the influence of different fractions of i-PRF on the physical and biological properties derived from variations in i-PRF fractionation preparation. The i-PRF samples, obtained from the blood samples of 10 donors, were used to harvest i-PRF and were fractioned into two types. The yellow i-PRF fractionation was harvested from the upper yellow zone, while the red i-PRF fractionation was collected from both the yellow and red zone of the buffy coat. The viscoelastic property measurements, including the clot formation time, α-angle, and maximum clot firmness, were performed by rotational thromboelastometry. The fibrin network was examined using a scanning electron microscope. Furthermore, the concentration of growth factors released, including VEGF, TGF-β1, and PDGF, were quantified using ELISA. A paired t-test with a 95% confidence interval was used. All three viscoelastic properties were statistically significantly higher in the yellow i-PRF compared to the red i-PRF. The scanning electron microscope reviewed more cellular components in the red i-PRF compared to the yellow i-PRF. In addition, the fibrin network of the yellow i-PRF showed a higher density than that in the red i-PRF. There was no statistically significant difference between the concentration of VEGF and TGF-β1. However, at Day 7 and Day 14 PDGF concentrations were statistically significantly higher in the red i-PRF compared to the yellow group. In conclusion, these results showed that the red i-PRF provided better biological properties through the release of growth factors. On the other hand, the yellow i-PRF had greater viscoelastic physical properties. Further investigations into the appropriate i-PRF fractionation for certain surgical procedures are therefore necessary to clarify the suitability for each fraction for different types of regenerative therapy.