Rice can be cultivated in highlands, which can expose it to iron deficiency, or under irrigation, which can lead to iron toxicity and lower productivity. This study aimed to investigate the strategies used by rice plants under different divalent and trivalent sources of iron excess. Rice plants from a lowland and upland cultivar were grown in nutrient solution with toxic concentrations of ferrous or ferric iron. A mineral nutrient quantification and anatomical analysis were performed on leaves and roots. Physiological damage was assessed by leaf photochemical parameters and lipid peroxidation. Expression levels of genes related to iron homeostasis were analyzed. More pronounced nutritional deficiencies, oxidative stress and physiological damage were observed in plants exposed to toxic levels of ferrous iron. Ferritin expression increased in leaves of both cultivars under ferrous or ferric iron excess. We showed that sulfate iron was more toxic to the two rice cultivars even though this iron source was less translocated in the plant. Trivalent iron complexed to citrate is easily translocated through rice plants, but it is less toxic than the divalent iron. Rice plants are able to cope with this iron overload by keeping photosynthetic apparatus working properly.

In recent decades, third-generation (3G) biofuels have become a more attractive method of fuel production, as algae cultivation does not infringe on resources needed for food production. Additionally, algae can adapt to different environments, has high photosynthetic efficiency (CO₂ fixation), and has a high potential for carbohydrate accumulation. The prevalence of algae worldwide demonstrates its ability to adapt to different environments and climates, proving its biodiversity and versatility. Algae can be grown in wastewater, seawater, and even sewage, thus ensuring a lower water footprint and greater energy efficiency during algal biomass production. Because of this, the optimization of 3G ethanol production appears to be an excellent alternative to mitigate environmental impacts and increase energy and food security. This critical review presents (i) the stages of cultivation and processing of micro and macroalgae; (ii) the selection of yeasts (through engineering and/or bioprospecting) to produce ethanol from these biomasses; (iii) the potential of seawater-based facilities to reduce water footprint; and (iv) the mass and energy balances of 3G ethanol production in the world energy matrix. This article is, above all, a brainstorm on the environmental viability of algae bioethanol.