Candice Coker Morey

Dr. Candice Coker Morey

Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2005 in Cognitive Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NCNelson Cowan
Nelson Cowan
Emily M. ElliottEmily M. Elliott
Emily M. Elliott
JSJ. Scott Saults
J. Scott Saults
CMCandice Coker Morey
Candice Coker Morey
SMSam Mattox
Sam Mattox
ACAndrew R.A. Conway
Andrew R.A. Conway

22 April 2008 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JRJeffrey N. Rouder
Jeffrey N. Rouder
RMRichard D. Morey
Richard D. Morey
NCNelson Cowan
Nelson Cowan
CZChristopher E. Zwilling
Christopher E. Zwilling
CMCandice Coker Morey
Candice Coker Morey
MPMichael S. Pratte
Michael S. Pratte
Visual working memory is often modeled as having a fixed number of slots. We test this model by assessing the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) of participants in a visual-working-memory change-detection task. ROC plots yielded straight lines with a slope of 1.0, a tell-tale characteristic of all-or-none mnemonic representations. Formal model assessment yielded evidence highly consistent with a discrete fixed-capacity model of working memory for this task.

19 February 2011 in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JRJeffrey N. Rouder
Jeffrey N. Rouder
RMRichard D. Morey
Richard D. Morey
CMCandice Coker Morey
Candice Coker Morey
NCNelson Cowan
Nelson Cowan
Although the measurement of working memory capacity is crucial to understanding working memory and its interaction with other cognitive faculties, there are inconsistencies in the literature on how...

1 January 2016 in Royal Society Open Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RMRichard D. Morey
Richard D. Morey
CCChristopher D. Chambers
Christopher D. Chambers
PEPeter J. Etchells
Peter J. Etchells
CHChristine R. Harris
Christine R. Harris
RHRink Hoekstra
Rink Hoekstra
RZRolf A. Zwaan
Rolf A. Zwaan
Openness is one of the central values of science. Open scientific practices such as sharing data, materials and analysis scripts alongside published articles have many benefits, including easier replication and extension studies, increased availability of data for theory-building and meta-analysis, and increased possibility of review and collaboration even after a paper has been published. Although modern information technology makes sharing easier than ever before, uptake of open practices had been slow. We suggest this might be in part due to a social dilemma arising from misaligned incentives and propose a specific, concrete mechanism—reviewers withholding comprehensive review—to achieve the goal of creating the expectation of open practices as a matter of scientific principle.

1 April 2004 in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CMCandice Coker Morey
Candice Coker Morey
NCNelson Cowan
Nelson Cowan

9 December 2009 in Developmental Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NCNelson Cowan
Nelson Cowan
CMCandice Coker Morey
Candice Coker Morey
Angela M. AuBuchonAngela M. AuBuchon
Angela M. AuBuchon
CZChristopher E. Zwilling
Christopher E. Zwilling
AGAmanda L. Gilchrist
Amanda L. Gilchrist