Carlos David Bruque

Dr. Carlos David Bruque

Unidad de Conocimiento Traslacional Hospitalaria Patagónica - Hospital de Alta Complejidad El Calafate SAMIC, El Calafate, Santa Cruz, Argentina
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 October 2017 in Human Mutation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LSLeandro Simonetti
Leandro Simonetti
Carlos David BruqueCarlos David Bruque
Carlos David Bruque
CFCecilia S. Fernández
Cecilia S. Fernández
BBBelén Benavides-Mori
Belén Benavides-Mori
MDMarisol Delea
Marisol Delea
LDLiliana Dain
Liliana Dain

31 July 2019 in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EREzequiel Mariano Rivero
Ezequiel Mariano Rivero
LMLeandro Marcelo Martinez
Leandro Marcelo Martinez
Carlos David BruqueCarlos David Bruque
Carlos David Bruque
LGLucia Gargiulo
Lucia Gargiulo
ABAriana Bruzzone
Ariana Bruzzone
ILIsabel Alicia Lüthy
Isabel Alicia Lüthy

14 December 2016 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Carlos David BruqueCarlos David Bruque
Carlos David Bruque
MDMarisol Delea
Marisol Delea
CFCecilia S. Fernández
Cecilia S. Fernández
JOJuan V. Orza
Juan V. Orza
MTMelisa Taboas
Melisa Taboas
LDLiliana Dain
Liliana Dain
Congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency accounts for 90–95% of CAH cases. In this work we performed an extensive survey of mutations and SNPs modifying the coding sequence of the CYP21A2 gene. Using bioinformatic tools and two plausible CYP21A2 structures as templates, we initially classified all known mutants (n = 343) according to their putative functional impacts, which were either reported in the literature or inferred from structural models. We then performed a detailed analysis on the subset of mutations believed to exclusively impact protein stability. For those mutants, the predicted stability was calculated and correlated with the variant’s expected activity. A high concordance was obtained when comparing our predictions with available in vitro residual activities and/or the patient’s phenotype. The predicted stability and derived activity of all reported mutations and SNPs lacking functional assays (n = 108) were assessed. As expected, most of the SNPs (52/76) showed no biological implications. Moreover, this approach was applied to evaluate the putative synergy that could emerge when two mutations occurred in cis. In addition, we propose a putative pathogenic effect of five novel mutations, p.L107Q, p.L122R, p.R132H, p.P335L and p.H466fs, found in 21-hydroxylase deficient patients of our cohort.

7 January 2022 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Paula BuonfiglioPaula Buonfiglio
Paula Buonfiglio
Carlos David BruqueCarlos David Bruque
Carlos David Bruque
VLvanesa lotersztein
vanesa lotersztein
LLLeonela Natalia Luce
Leonela Natalia Luce
Florencia GilibertoFlorencia Giliberto
Florencia Giliberto
Viviana DalamonViviana Dalamon
Viviana Dalamon
Hearing loss is a heterogeneous disorder. Identification of causative mutations is demanding due to genetic heterogeneity. In this study, we investigated the genetic cause of sensorineural hearing loss in patients with severe/profound deafness. After the exclusion of GJB2-GJB6 mutations, we performed whole exome sequencing in 32 unrelated Argentinean families. Mutations were detected in 16 known deafness genes in 20 patients: ACTG1, ADGRV1 (GPR98), CDH23, COL4A3, COL4A5, DFNA5 (GSDDE), EYA4, LARS2, LOXHD1, MITF, MYO6, MYO7A, TECTA, TMPRSS3, USH2A and WSF1. Notably, 11 variants affecting 9 different non-GJB2 genes resulted novel: c.12829C > T, p.(Arg4277*) in ADGRV1; c.337del, p.(Asp109*) and c.3352del, p.(Gly1118Alafs*7) in CDH23; c.3500G > A, p.(Gly1167Glu) in COL4A3; c.1183C > T, p.(Pro395Ser) and c.1759C > T, p.(Pro587Ser) in COL4A5; c.580 + 2 T > C in EYA4; c.1481dup, p.(Leu495Profs*31) in LARS2; c.1939 T > C, p.(Phe647Leu), in MYO6; c.733C > T, p.(Gln245*) in MYO7A and c.242C > G, p.(Ser81*) in TMPRSS3 genes. To predict the effect of these variants, novel protein modeling and protein stability analysis were employed. These results highlight the value of whole exome sequencing to identify candidate variants, as well as bioinformatic strategies to infer their pathogenicity.

21 October 2020 in Genes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Paula BuonfiglioPaula Buonfiglio
Paula Buonfiglio
Carlos David BruqueCarlos David Bruque
Carlos David Bruque
LLLeonela Natalia Luce
Leonela Natalia Luce
Florencia GilibertoFlorencia Giliberto
Florencia Giliberto
VLvanesa lotersztein
vanesa lotersztein
Viviana DalamonViviana Dalamon
Viviana Dalamon
Genetic variants in GJB2 and GJB6 genes are the most frequent causes of hereditary hearing loss among several deaf populations worldwide. Molecular diagnosis enables proper genetic counseling and medical prognosis to patients. In this study, we present an update of testing results in a cohort of Argentinean non-syndromic hearing-impaired individuals. A total of 48 different sequence variants were detected in genomic DNA from patients referred to our laboratory. They were manually curated and classified based on the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology ACMG/AMP standards and hearing-loss-gene-specific criteria of the ClinGen Hearing Loss Expert Panel. More than 50% of sequence variants were reclassified from their previous categorization in ClinVar. These results provide an accurately interpreted set of variants to be taken into account by clinicians and the scientific community, and hence, aid the precise genetic counseling to patients.

5 May 2020 in Human Mutation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JKJorge Emilio Kolomenski
Jorge Emilio Kolomenski
MDMarisol Delea
Marisol Delea
LSLeandro Simonetti
Leandro Simonetti
MFMónica C. Fabbro
Mónica C. Fabbro
LELucía D. Espeche
Lucía D. Espeche
LDLiliana Dain
Liliana Dain