Charissa Kim

Dr. Charissa Kim

Huntington Memorial Hospital
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2018 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Charissa KimCharissa Kim
Charissa Kim
RGRuli Gao
Ruli Gao
ESEmi Sei
Emi Sei
RBRachel Brandt
Rachel Brandt
JHJohan Hartman
Johan Hartman
NNNicholas E. Navin
Nicholas E. Navin

9 August 2017 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RGRuli Gao
Ruli Gao
Charissa KimCharissa Kim
Charissa Kim
ESEmi Sei
Emi Sei
TFTheodoros Foukakis
Theodoros Foukakis
NCNicola Crosetto
Nicola Crosetto
NNNicholas Navin
Nicholas Navin
Single cell RNA sequencing has emerged as a powerful tool for resolving transcriptional diversity in tumors, but is limited by throughput, cost and the ability to process archival frozen tissue samples. Here we develop a high-throughput 3′ single-nucleus RNA sequencing approach that combines nanogrid technology, automated imaging, and cell selection to sequence up to ~1800 single nuclei in parallel. We compare the transcriptomes of 485 single nuclei to 424 single cells in a breast cancer cell line, which shows a high concordance (93.34%) in gene levels and abundance. We also analyze 416 nuclei from a frozen breast tumor sample and 380 nuclei from normal breast tissue. These data reveal heterogeneity in cancer cell phenotypes, including angiogenesis, proliferation, and stemness, and a minor subpopulation (19%) with many overexpressed cancer genes. Our studies demonstrate the utility of nanogrid single-nucleus RNA sequencing for studying the transcriptional programs of tumor nuclei in frozen archival tissue samples.

1 July 2019 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics (IJROBP)
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MNMatthew S. Ning
Matthew S. Ning
DGDaniel R. Gomez
Daniel R. Gomez
ASAashish K. Shah
Aashish K. Shah
Charissa KimCharissa Kim
Charissa Kim
MPMatthew B. Palmer
Matthew B. Palmer
GGG. Brandon Gunn
G. Brandon Gunn

27 February 2013 in Journal of Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AIAlicia IZQUIERDO
Alicia IZQUIERDO
CDChelsi Darling
Chelsi Darling
NMNic Manos
Nic Manos
HPHilda Pozos
Hilda Pozos
Charissa KimCharissa Kim
Charissa Kim
PRPeter H. Rudebeck
Peter H. Rudebeck
The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and basolateral amygdala (BLA) constitute part of a neural circuit important for adaptive, goal-directed learning. One task measuring flexibility of response to changes in reward is discrimination reversal learning. Damage to OFC produces well documented impairments on various forms of reversal learning in rodents, monkeys, and humans. Recent reports show that BLA, though highly interconnected with OFC, may be differentially involved in reversal learning. In the present experiment, we compared the effects of bilateral, ibotenic acid lesions of OFC or BLA (or SHAM) on visual discrimination and reversal learning. Specifically, we used pairwise visual discrimination methods, as is commonly administered in non-human primate studies, and analyzed how animals use positive and negative trial-by-trial feedback, domains not previously explored in a rat study. As expected, OFC lesions displayed significantly slower reversal learning than SHAM and BLA rats across sessions. Rats with BLA lesions, conversely, showed facilitated reversal learning relative to SHAM and OFC groups. Furthermore, a trial-by-trial analysis of the errors committed showed the BLA group benefited more from incorrectly performed trials (or negative feedback) on future choices than either SHAM or OFC rats. This provides evidence that BLA and OFC are involved in updating responses to changes in reward contingency and that the roles are distinct. Our results are discussed in relation to a competitive framework model for OFC and BLA in reward processing.

15 August 2017 in Breast Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NANatalia Paez Arango
Natalia Paez Arango
EYErkan Yuca
Erkan Yuca
MZMing Zhao
Ming Zhao
KEKurt W. Evans
Kurt W. Evans
SSStephen Scott
Stephen Scott
FMFunda Meric-Bernstam
Funda Meric-Bernstam
Selinexor (KPT-330) is an oral agent that has been shown to inhibit the nuclear exporter XPO1. Given the pressing need for novel therapies for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), we sought to determine the antitumor effects of selinexor in vitro and in vivo. Twenty-six breast cancer cell lines of different breast cancer subtypes were treated with selinexor in vitro. Cell proliferation assays were used to measure the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) and to test the effects in combination with chemotherapy. In vivo efficacy was tested both as a single agent and in combination therapy in TNBC patient-derived xenografts (PDXs). Selinexor demonstrated growth inhibition in all 14 TNBC cell lines tested; TNBC cell lines were more sensitive to selinexor (median IC50 44 nM, range 11 to 550 nM) than were estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer cell lines (median IC50 > 1000 nM, range 40 to >1000 nM; P = 0.017). In multiple TNBC cell lines, selinexor was synergistic with paclitaxel, carboplatin, eribulin, and doxorubicin in vitro. Selinexor as a single agent reduced tumor growth in vivo in four of five different TNBC PDX models, with a median tumor growth inhibition ratio (T/C: treatment/control) of 42% (range 31 to 73%) and demonstrated greater antitumor efficacy in combination with paclitaxel or eribulin (average T/C ratios of 27% and 12%, respectively). Collectively, these findings strongly suggest that selinexor is a promising therapeutic agent for TNBC as a single agent and in combination with standard chemotherapy.

1 June 2011 in Behavioral Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SOSerena Ostrander
Serena Ostrander
VCVictor A. Cazares
Victor A. Cazares
Charissa KimCharissa Kim
Charissa Kim
SCShauna Cheung
Shauna Cheung
IGIsabel Gonzalez
Isabel Gonzalez
AIAlicia IZQUIERDO
Alicia IZQUIERDO
The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and basolateral nucleus of the amygdala (BLA) are important neural regions in responding adaptively to changes in the incentive value of reward. Recent evidence suggests these structures may be differentially engaged in effort and cue-guided choice behavior. In 2 T-maze experiments, we examined the effects of bilateral lesions of either BLA or OFC on (1) effortful choices in which rats could climb a barrier for a high reward or select a low reward with no effort and (2) effortful choices when a visual cue signaled changes in reward magnitude. In both experiments, BLA rats displayed transient work aversion, choosing the effortless low reward option. OFC rats were work averse only in the no cue conditions, displaying a pattern of attenuated recovery from the cue conditions signaling reward unavailability in the effortful arm. Control measures rule out an inability to discriminate the cue in either lesion group.