Stress–strain responses of Leighton Buzzard sand are investigated under bidirectional shear. The tests are conducted by using the variable direction dynamic cyclic simple shear (VDDCSS). Soil samples are anisotropically consolidated under a vertical normal stress and horizontal shear stress and then sheared in undrained conditions by applying a horizontal shear stress acting along a different direction from the consolidation shear stress. The influence of the orientation and magnitude of the consolidation shear stress is investigated in this study. There have been only a few previous studies on soil responses under bidirectional shear, of which most studies do not consider the impact of the magnitude of the consolidation shear stress. They are compared with current studies, indicating both similarities and differences. Generally, all test results indicate that a smaller angle between the first and second horizontal shear stress leads to more brittle responses with higher peak strengths, and a larger angle leads to more ductile responses. In addition, the consolidation shear tends to make soil samples denser, and both the magnitude of consolidation shear stress and its direction influence the following stress–strain responses of soil samples.

Previous researches have indicated the non-coaxiality of sand in unidirectional simple shear tests, in which the direction of the principal axes of stresses does not coincide with the corresponding principal axes of strain rate tensors. Due to the limitation of apparatus that most of testing facilities can only add shear stress in one direction, the influence of stress history on the noncoaxiality of sand is not fully considered in previous tests. In this study, the effect of stress history on the non-coaxiality of sand is systematically studied by using the first commercially available Variable Direction Dynamic Cyclic Simple Shear system (VDDCSS). Samples of Leighton Buzzard sand (Fraction B) are first consolidated under a vertical confining stress and consolidation shear stress, and then sheared by a drained monotonic shear stress. Angle (θ) between the consolidation shear stress and the drained monotonic shear stress is varied from 0° to 180°, with an interval of 30°. The change of principal axes of stresses is predicted by well-established equations, and the principal axe of strain rate is calculated using recorded data. Results show that the level of non-coaxiality is increased by the increasing θ, especially at the initial stage of drained shearing.

The effect of sample reconstitution methods on the behavior of sand under shearing is investigated by using the first commercially available Variable Direction Dynamic Cyclic Simple Shear System. Three sample reconstitution methods are used in this study, which are as follows: the dry funnel method, air pluviation, and dried wet tamping. Because only dry specimens can be tested in many simple shear apparatuses, in this study, a new method called dried wet tamping is used to model the soil fabric generated by the wet tamping method, wherein the soil sample prepared by wet tamping is dried before being tested. Leighton Buzzard sand at various relative densities is tested in monotonic, one-directional cyclic, and two-dimensional circular cyclic simple shear tests. Experimental results show that different sample reconstitution methods have limited effects on the shear behavior in monotonic loading tests. On the contrary, the sample reconstitution methods greatly influence the dynamic responses of sand, including the undrained one-dimensional cyclic and two-dimensional circular cyclic loading. The liquefaction resistance is the greatest using the dried wet tamping method, followed by the dry funnel method and air pluviation method. These test results are also compared with previous studies on sample reconstitution methods, and their similarities and differences are analyzed.

Rock mass pressure has always been a research hotspot in the field of tunnel engineering, especially in the super large-span tunnel, which is characterized by flat section, large excavation span, and complex stress field. Based on the Letuan Tunnel (a bi-directional tunnel with eight traffic lanes) of Binlai expressway expansion project in Shandong Province, China, this paper focused on the calculation method of rock mass pressure and the evolution law of load release in the construction process of the super large-span tunnel excavated by upper-bench central diaphragm (CD) method. Based on field measured data of Letuan Tunnel, the deformation behavior of primary lining and the distribution state of rock mass pressure during the tunnel construction were analyzed. According to the bearing mode of supporting structure, the mechanical models of different construction stages were established. Then, the rock mass pressures in different construction stages were back-calculated using mechanical models and compared with the measured values, and the evolution law of load release during the tunnel construction was discussed. The study results show that the tunnel deformation and rock mass pressure were significantly affected by the construction process and support form, and the excavation span was the key factor affecting the stability of rock mass. For the shallow-buried super large-span tunnel constructed by upper-bench CD method, the primary support of upper bench was under eccentric pressure. The comparison between the back-calculated value and the field measured value indicated that they were similar, and the average relative error was 17.23%. According to the concept of load release coefficient proposed in this paper, the load release coefficient after the pilot tunnel ahead (Part I) excavation reached 63%, and the load release coefficient after the pilot tunnel behind excavation (Part II) was 37%, which means that the rock mass pressure of Part I is increased about 59% due to the excavation of Part II.