Background: Team-based learning (TBL) is increasingly being utilized across medical fields by engaging students in small group discussions. The readiness assurance test (RAT) is an essential feature that differentiates TBL from problem-based learning (PBL) activity sequences. No publication has discussed differences in the RAT in TBL in medical schools. The purpose of this meta-analysis study was to examine the performance of learners in terms of group RAT (GRAT) and individual RAT (IRAT) scores in TBL for students of healthcare professions. Methods: Databases, including PubMed and Cochrane were searched using several terms. We assessed the quality of included studies and conducted a meta-analysis. Results: In total, 11 studies with 1575 participants were identified. Quality assessment scores of these studies ranged 4 ~ 7. Mean GRAT scores were significantly higher than mean IRAT scores (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 2.027, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.657 ~ 2.486, p heterogeneity < 0.001). Although the test of subgroup differences was insignificant (p = 0.113), the nursing-only subgroup showed much better performance in the GRAT than the IRAT (SMD = 2.3CI: 95% CI = 2.0 ~ 2.6, I² = 48.77%) compared to the others subgroup which included students from different majors. The subgroup analysis explained the heterogeneity in the overall analysis. Because of inadequate information from these 11 studies, a meta-regression could not explore the source of heterogeneity in terms of the mean age, duration of the intervention, preparation time before the RAT, and previous TBL experienced by students. Conclusions: Students achieved significantly higher scores for the GRAT than for the IRAT, especially the group which only included nursing students, which implies excellent collaboration in the group of nursing students.

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) virus infection, causing immune dysfunction and chronic hepatitis, is one of the leading risk factors for hepatocellular cancer. We investigated how Arthrospira affected hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) reduction in CHB patients under continued nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA). Sixty CHB patients who had been receiving NA for at least one year with undetectable HBV DNA were randomized into three groups: control and oral Arthrospira at 3 or 6 g daily add-on therapy groups. Patients were followed up for 6 months. Oral Arthrospira-diet mice were established to investigate the possible immunological mechanism of Arthrospira against HBV. Within 6 months, mean quantitative HBsAg (qHBsAg) decreased in the oral Arthrospira add-on therapy group. Interestingly, interferon gamma (IFN-γ) increased but TNF-α, interleukin 6 (IL-6), hepatic fibrosis, and steatosis decreased in the add-on groups. In mice, Arthrospira enhanced both innate and adaptive immune system, especially natural killer (NK) cell cytotoxicity, B cell activation, and the interleukin 2 (IL-2), IFN-γ immune response. Arthrospira may modulate IL-2- and TNF-α/IFN-γ-mediated B and T cell activation to reduce HBsAg. Also, Arthrospira has the potential to restore immune tolerance and enhance HBsAg seroclearance in CHB patients through promoting T, B, and NK cell activation.

For resectable esophageal cancer (EC), it remains controversial whether to place percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) before the curative surgery to provide nutritional support during the neoa...

Rationale: Scrotal swelling is a rare complication of acute pancreatitis. It had been explained by fluid accumulation in scrotum originated from abdomen. Here we demonstrated a case of recurrent pancreatitis with hydrocele caused by impaired testicular venous drainage. Patient concerns: A 53-year-old man presented with sudden onset epigastric pain after an alcohol binge. Recurrent acute pancreatitis was confirmed by medical history, physical examination, elevated lipase level and abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan. Right scrotal swelling was noticed on the next day. Diagnosis: The scrotal ultrasonography demonstrated fluid accumulation around the testis and varicocele consistent with scrotal hydrocele. CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis showed encasement of the right testicular vein by pancreatic phlegmon. Interventions: The patient was subject to Nulla per os, hydration, and opioid analgesics for pancreatitis. No intervention was performed for scrotal swelling. Outcomes: Hydrocele gradually resolved along with acute pancreatitis. Lessons: Pancreatic phlegmon compromised testicular venous return which led to scrotal hydrocele and posed a threat to fertility. The study has provided a novel pathologic linkage. This complication should be taken into account.

There are three methods to retrieve large common bile duct stones, the first is endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST), the second is endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilatation (EPLBD), and the third is limited EST plus EPLBD. Although EST is the most popularly used method, it has higher risk of bleeding complication and basket stuck. EPLBD alone without EST demonstrated safe and quick in the clinical practice, but there were only few studies focused on comparing EST or EPLBD alone. Thus, this study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of EPLBD with EST. We searched for PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to collect relevant articles until August 31st, 2019. We included randomized controlled trials, common bile duct stones > 10 mm, comparison of endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilatation with endoscopic sphincterotomy, and patients older than 18. We compare endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilatation with endoscopic sphincterotomy on the clearance of large common bile duct stones, the adverse events, and the need for mechanical lithotripsy. This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO and the registration number is CRD42020150485. Total six studies met inclusion criteria and 762 participants were enrolled. The data revealed that endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilatation alone was comparable to endoscopic sphincterotomy on the clearance of large common bile duct stones (RR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.93-1.12), the adverse events (RR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.71-1.43) and the need for mechanical lithotripsy. In the subgroup analysis, the requirement of mechanical lithotripsy decreased in the non-Chinese group (RR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.41-0.84). The efficacy and safety to clean large common bile duct stones are comparable in either EPLBD or EST. In addition, EPLBD alone not only saves the operation time but also reduces the chance of mechanical lithotripsy in the subgroup analysis.