Chunrong Jia

Dr. Chunrong Jia

University of Memphis
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Chunrong JiaChunrong Jia
Chunrong Jia
Stuart BattermanStuart Batterman
Stuart Batterman
Both the recent classification of naphthalene as a possible human carcinogen and its ubiquitous presence motivate this critical review of naphthalene’s sources and exposures. We evaluate the environmental literature on naphthalene published since 1990, drawing on nearly 150 studies that report emissions and concentrations in indoor, outdoor and personal air. While naphthalene is both a volatile organic compound and a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon, concentrations and exposures are poorly characterized relative to many other pollutants. Most airborne emissions result from combustion, and key sources include industry, open burning, tailpipe emissions, and cigarettes. The second largest source is off-gassing, specifically from naphthalene’s use as a deodorizer, repellent and fumigant. In the U.S., naphthalene’s use as a moth repellant has been reduced in favor of para-dichlorobenzene, but extensive use continues in mothballs, which appears responsible for some of the highest indoor exposures, along with off-label uses. Among the studies judged to be representative, average concentrations ranged from 0.18 to 1.7 μg m-3 in non-smoker’s homes, and from 0.02 to 0.31 μg m-3 outdoors in urban areas. Personal exposures have been reported in only three European studies. Indoor sources are the major contributor to (non-occupational) exposure. While its central tendencies fall well below guideline levels relevant to acute health impacts, several studies have reported maximum concentrations exceeding 100 μg m-3, far above guideline levels. Using current but draft estimates of cancer risks, naphthalene is a major environmental risk driver, with typical individual risk levels in the 10-4 range, which is high and notable given that millions of individuals are exposed. Several factors influence indoor and outdoor concentrations, but the literature is inconsistent on their effects. Further investigation is needed to better characterize naphthalene’s sources and exposures, especially for indoor and personal measurements.

1 March 2008 in Atmospheric Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Chunrong JiaChunrong Jia
Chunrong Jia
Stuart BattermanStuart Batterman
Stuart Batterman
CGChristopher Godwin
Christopher Godwin

19 March 2009 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Stuart BattermanStuart Batterman
Stuart Batterman
SCSergei Chernyak
Sergei Chernyak
Chunrong JiaChunrong Jia
Chunrong Jia
CGChristopher Godwin
Christopher Godwin
SCSimone Charles
Simone Charles

1 January 2017 in Environmental Pollution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BLBian Liu
Bian Liu
ZXZhuqing Xue
Zhuqing Xue
XZXianlei Zhu
Xianlei Zhu
Chunrong JiaChunrong Jia
Chunrong Jia

1 June 2007 in Environmental Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Stuart BattermanStuart Batterman
Stuart Batterman
Chunrong JiaChunrong Jia
Chunrong Jia
GHGina Hatzivasilis
Gina Hatzivasilis

1 March 2008 in Atmospheric Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Chunrong JiaChunrong Jia
Chunrong Jia
Stuart BattermanStuart Batterman
Stuart Batterman
CGChristopher Godwin
Christopher Godwin