Carlos Llopis-Albert

Dr. Carlos Llopis-Albert

Universitat Politècnica de València, Spain
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2019 in International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FRFrancisco Rubio
Francisco Rubio
FVFrancisco Valero
Francisco Valero
CLCarlos Llopis-Albert
Carlos Llopis-Albert
Humanoid robots, unmanned rovers, entertainment pets, drones, and so on are great examples of mobile robots. They can be distinguished from other robots by their ability to move autonomously, with enough intelligence to react and make decisions based on the perception they receive from the environment. Mobile robots must have some source of input data, some way of decoding that input, and a way of taking actions (including its own motion) to respond to a changing world. The need to sense and adapt to an unknown environment requires a powerful cognition system. Nowadays, there are mobile robots that can walk, run, jump, and so on like their biological counterparts. Several fields of robotics have arisen, such as wheeled mobile robots, legged robots, flying robots, robot vision, artificial intelligence, and so on, which involve different technological areas such as mechanics, electronics, and computer science. In this article, the world of mobile robots is explored including the new trends. These new trends are led by artificial intelligence, autonomous driving, network communication, cooperative work, nanorobotics, friendly human–robot interfaces, safe human–robot interaction, and emotion expression and perception. Furthermore, these news trends are applied to different fields such as medicine, health care, sports, ergonomics, industry, distribution of goods, and service robotics. These tendencies will keep going their evolution in the coming years.

1 January 2021 in Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CLCarlos Llopis-Albert
Carlos Llopis-Albert
FRFrancisco Rubio
Francisco Rubio
FVFrancisco Valero
Francisco Valero


1 February 2022 in Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SZShouzhen Zeng
Shouzhen Zeng
NZNa Zhang
Na Zhang
CZChonghui Zhang
Chonghui Zhang
WSWeihua Su
Weihua Su
CLCarlos Llopis-Albert
Carlos Llopis-Albert

1 October 2010 in Journal of Hydrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SPS. Peña-Haro
S. Peña-Haro
CLCarlos Llopis-Albert
Carlos Llopis-Albert
MANUEL PULIDO-VELAZQUEZMANUEL PULIDO-VELAZQUEZ
MANUEL PULIDO-VELAZQUEZ
David Pulido-VelazquezDavid Pulido-Velazquez
David Pulido-Velazquez

1 March 2018 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XZXiaoxue Zheng
Xiaoxue Zheng
HLHaiyan Lin
Haiyan Lin
Zhi LiuZhi Liu
Zhi Liu
DLDeng-feng Li
Deng-feng Li
CLCarlos Llopis-Albert
Carlos Llopis-Albert
SZShouzhen Zeng
Shouzhen Zeng
In order to address challenges in the sustainable development of transportation, economy, and environment, governments of China and conventional automobile manufacturers are extremely concerned about the development of the electric vehicle (EV) manufacturing industry and market. However, owing to the limitations of EVs and the government economic policies on decreasing subsidies in China, many manufacturers are worried about entering the EV market. Given the low consumer preference for EVs, using a leader-follower Stackelberg game model, we investigate the impact of government a subsidy on the optimal production and pricing decisions of an auto manufacturer who could produce both EVs and conventional vehicles. We characterize whether/under what conditions the manufacturer’s decision to offer EV products under government subsidy, whilst increasing its profits (a win-win situation). On the policy side, we delineate how government a subsidy can be set to realize the inherent economic, environmental, and social benefits of EV production (the triple win of EV production). We further investigate the impact of EV manufacturing- and society-related factors on the balance among manufacturer profits, environmental impact and social welfare. This study also finds that the adoption of EVs is not bound to be beneficial for the environment.