The development of malign cells that can grow in any part of the stomach, known as gastric cancer, is one of the most common causes of death worldwide. In order to increase the survival rate in patients with this condition, it is essential to improve the decision-making process leading to a better and more efficient selection of treatment strategies. Nowadays, with the large amount of information present in hospital institutions, it is possible to use data mining algorithms to improve the healthcare delivery. Thus, this study, using the CRISP methodology, aims to predict not only the mortality associated with this disease, but also the occurrence of any complication following surgery. A set of classification models were tested and compared in order to improve the prediction accuracy. The study showed that, on one hand, the J48 algorithm using oversampling is the best technique to predict the mortality in gastric cancer patients, with an accuracy of approximately 74%. On the other hand, the rain forest algorithm using oversampling presents the best results when predicting the possible occurrence of complications among gastric cancer patients after their in-hospital stays, with an accuracy of approximately 83%.
Neural networks have established themselves as powerhouses in what concerns several types of detection, ranging from human activities to their emotions. Several types of analysis exist, and the most popular and successful is video. However, there are other kinds of analysis, which, despite not being used as often, are still promising. In this article, a comparison between audio and video analysis is drawn in an attempt to classify violence detection in real-time streams. This study, which followed the CRISP-DM methodology, made use of several models available through PyTorch in order to test a diverse set of models and achieve robust results. The results obtained proved why video analysis has such prevalence, with the video classification handily outperforming its audio classification counterpart. Whilst the audio models attained on average 76% accuracy, video models secured average scores of 89%, showing a significant difference in performance. This study concluded that the applied methods are quite promising in detecting violence, using both audio and video.