The performance of solid oral dosage forms targeting the colon is typically evaluated using standardised pharmacopeial dissolution apparatuses. However, these fail to replicate colonic hydrodynamics. This study develops a digital twin of the Dynamic Colon Model; a physiologically representative in vitro model of the human proximal colon. Magnetic resonance imaging of the Dynamic Colon Model verified that the digital twin robustly replicated flow patterns under different physiological conditions (media viscosity, volume, and peristaltic wave speed). During local contractile activity, antegrade flows of 0.06–0.78 cm s−1 and backflows of −2.16–−0.21 cm s−1 were measured. Mean wall shear rates were strongly time and viscosity dependent although peaks were measured between 3.05–10.12 s−1 and 5.11–20.34 s−1 in the Dynamic Colon Model and its digital twin respectively, comparable to previous estimates of the USPII with paddle speeds of 25 and 50 rpm. It is recommended that viscosity and shear rates are considered when designing future dissolution test methodologies for colon-targeted formulations. In the USPII, paddle speeds >50 rpm may not recreate physiologically relevant shear rates. These findings demonstrate how the combination of biorelevant in vitro and in silico models can provide new insights for dissolution testing beyond established pharmacopeial methods.
Knowledge of luminal flow inside the human colon remains elusive, despite its importance for the design of new colon-targeted drug delivery systems and physiologically relevant in silico models of dissolution mechanics within the colon. This study uses magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques to visualise, measure and differentiate between different motility patterns within an anatomically representative in vitro dissolution model of the human ascending colon: the dynamic colon model (DCM). The segmented architecture and peristalsis-like contractile activity of the DCM generated flow profiles that were distinct from compendial dissolution apparatuses. MRI enabled different motility patterns to be classified by the degree of mixing-related motion using a new tagging method. Different media viscosities could also be differentiated, which is important for an understanding of colonic pathophysiology, the conditions that a colon-targeted dosage form may be subjected to and the effectiveness of treatments. The tagged MRI data showed that the DCM effectively mimicked wall motion, luminal flow patterns and the velocities of the contents of the human ascending colon. Accurate reproduction of in vivo hydrodynamics is an essential capability for a biorelevant mechanical model of the colon to make it suitable for in vitro data generation for in vitro in vivo evaluation (IVIVE) or in vitro in vivo correlation (IVIVC). This work illustrates how the DCM provides new insight into how motion of the colonic walls may control luminal hydrodynamics, driving erosion of a dosage form and subsequent drug release, compared to traditional pharmacopeial methods.
A physiologically based biopharmaceutic model (PBBM) of a modified-release formulation of theophylline (Uniphyllin Continus® 200 mg tablet) was developed and implemented to predict the pharmacokinetic (PK) data of healthy male volunteers by integrating dissolution profiles measured in a biorelevant in vitro model: the Dynamic Colon Model (DCM). The superiority of the DCM over the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Apparatus II (USP II) was demonstrated by the superior predictions for the 200 mg tablet (average absolute fold error (AAFE): 1.1–1.3 (DCM) vs. 1.3–1.5 (USP II). The best predictions were obtained using the three motility patterns (antegrade and retrograde propagating waves, baseline) in the DCM, which produced similar PK profiles. However, extensive erosion of the tablet occurred at all agitation speeds used in USP II (25, 50 and 100 rpm), resulting in an increased drug release rate in vitro and overpredicted PK data. The PK data of the Uniphyllin Continus® 400 mg tablet could not be predicted with the same accuracy using dissolution profiles from the DCM, which might be explained by differences in upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract residence times between the 200 and 400 mg tablets. Thus, it is recommended that the DCM be used for dosage forms in which the main release phenomena take place in the distal GI tract. However, the DCM again showed a better performance based on the overall AAFE compared to the USP II. Regional dissolution profiles within the DCM cannot currently be integrated into Simcyp®, which might limit the predictivity of the DCM. Thus, further compartmentalization of the colon within PBBM platforms is required to account for observed intra-regional differences in drug distribution.
The in vitro release of theophylline from an extended-release dosage form was studied under different hydrodynamic conditions in a United States Pharmacopoeial (USP) dissolution system II and a bespoke in vitro tubular model of the human colon, the Dynamic Colon Model (DCM). Five biorelevant motility patterns extracted from in vivo data were applied to the DCM, mimicking the human proximal colon under baseline conditions and following stimulation using polyethylene glycol or maltose; these represent the lower and upper bounds of motility normally expected in vivo. In the USPII, tablet dissolution was affected by changing hydrodynamic conditions at different agitation speeds of 25, 50 and 100 rpm. Applying different motility patterns in the DCM affected the dissolution profiles produced, with theophylline release at 24 h ranging from 56.74 ± 2.00% (baseline) to 96.74 ± 9.63% (maltose-stimulated). The concentration profiles of theophylline were markedly localized when measured at different segments of the DCM tube, highlighting the importance of a segmented lumen in intestine models and in generating spatial information to support simple temporal dissolution profiles. The results suggested that the shear stresses invoked by the unstimulated, healthy adult human colon may be lower than those in the USPII at 25 rpm and thus insufficient to achieve total release of a therapeutic compound from a hydroxyethyl cellulose matrix. When operated under stimulated conditions, drug release in the DCM was between that achieved at 25 and 50 rpm in the USPII.
Background/Objectives: Biorelevant in vitro dissolution testing is used increasingly to predict complex mechanisms in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract that determine oral bioavailability. However, the limited use of non-compendial systems is driven by the lack of widely accepted, standardized validation frameworks. This ongoing gap continues to restrict their adoption relative to United States Pharmacopeia (USP) apparatus. While the physiological relevance and biopredictive capabilities of the tiny-TIM and TIM-1 in vitro GI models have been demonstrated in previous studies, their inter-laboratory reproducibility has not been systematically established. Therefore, this international ring study evaluates the reproducibility of in vitro simulations of GI transit and absorption of paracetamol in fasted- and fed-state conditions in tiny-TIM and TIM-1. Methods: Three laboratories used TIM-1 and five used tiny-TIM to simulate oral administration of a 500 mg paracetamol solution to a healthy adult. Paracetamol solution was selected as a well-characterized and widely available BCS I compound to minimize formulation and solubility effects and focus on system performance, enabling the generation of a generic validation dataset for the reproducibility of TIM experiments. Results: Paracetamol bioaccessibility profiles were repeatable and reproducible (all pairwise f2 > 50). Maximum differences in total bioaccessible paracetamol were 0.9% (TIM-1) and 2.8% (tiny-TIM) within laboratories and 3.4 and 5.9% between laboratories. Inter-lab variability at individual time points remained <4.0% (fasted) and 5.2% (fed). Both TIM models produced biopredictive metrics, correctly predicting no food effect on total paracetamol bioaccessibility and capturing delayed tmax. Gastric and intestinal environments showed repeatable pH, temperature, and GI transit characteristics, with fluctuations across transit stages that mirrored reported in vivo patterns. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that TIM systems can reproducibly simulate gastrointestinal conditions across laboratories and generate consistent measurements of drug product performance, despite the complexity of the dynamic processes involved. While this evaluation involving a single BCS I drug solution should not be directly extrapolated to experiments with poorly soluble compounds or different formulations, it supports the use of TIM systems as robust in vitro models in drug product development. This study provides a standardized, inter-laboratory, baseline performance dataset to support regulatory submissions incorporating TIM data and enable more confident interpretation of TIM experiments.