David Cabral

Mr. David Cabral

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro – UFRJ
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 December 2021 in Pathogens
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMarzia Puccioni-Sohler
Marzia Puccioni-Sohler
Samya Jezine Da SilvaSamya Jezine Da Silva
Samya Jezine Da Silva
LFLuiz C. S. Faria
Luiz C. S. Faria
DCDavid Cabral
David Cabral
MCMauro Jorge Cabral-Castro
Mauro Jorge Cabral-Castro
Dengue (DENV) and chikungunya viruses (CHIKV) cause severe neurological complications, sometimes undiagnosed. Therefore, the use of more accessible neuroinflammatory biomarkers can be advantageous considering their diagnostic and prognostic potential for aggravated clinical outcomes. In this study, we aimed to evaluate neopterin and C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL-10) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for the diagnosis of neuroinvasive DENV and CHIKV. We analyzed the CSF of 66 patients with neurological disorders, comprising 12 neuroinvasive DENV/CHIKV, 20 inflammatory control (viral, bacterial, and fungal meningitis, and autoimmune disorders), and 24 noninflammatory control (cerebrovascular disease, dementia, neoplasm). There was no difference between the concentration of CSF neopterin in the neuroinvasive DENV/CHIKV and control groups. However, there was a significant difference in the CXCL-10 level when comparing the neuroinvasive DENV/CHIKV group and the non-inflammatory control (p < 0.05). Furthermore, we found a linear correlation between neopterin and CXCL-10 CSF levels in the three groups. For the DENV/CHIKV neuroinvasive diagnosis, the ROC curve showed the best cut-off values for CSF neopterin at 11.23 nmol/L (sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 63%), and for CSF CXCL-10 at 156.5 pg/mL (91.7% sensitivity and specificity). These results show that CXCL-10 in CSF represents an accurate neuroinflammatory biomarker that may contribute to neuroinvasive DENV/CHIKV diagnosis.

31 August 2025 in Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DCDavid Cabral
David Cabral
ARAndré Rivera
André Rivera
MBMarcelo A. P. Braga
Marcelo A. P. Braga
BPBárbara M. F. Passos
Bárbara M. F. Passos
IFIuri Ferreira Felix
Iuri Ferreira Felix
Christopher Vincent DeSimoneChristopher Vincent DeSimone
Christopher Vincent DeSimone

3 June 2026 in Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LALuisalice M. Afonso
Luisalice M. Afonso
IGIago T. C. Grillo
Iago T. C. Grillo
DCDavid Cabral
David Cabral
VAVitor P. de Almeida
Vitor P. de Almeida
GCGuilherme Dagostin de Carvalho
Guilherme Dagostin de Carvalho
ABAlexandra R. D. Brigido
Alexandra R. D. Brigido

22 December 2025 in Respiratory Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GCGiulia Carvalhal de Almeida Cordeiro
Giulia Carvalhal de Almeida Cordeiro
JDJúlia Moreira Diniz
Júlia Moreira Diniz
LHLarissa Calixto Hespanhol
Larissa Calixto Hespanhol
DCDavid Cabral
David Cabral
JAJafar Aljazeeri
Jafar Aljazeeri

22 February 2025
Verified
Preprint
Open access
DCDavid Cabral
David Cabral
ARAndré Rivera
André Rivera
MBMarcelo Antonio Pinheiro Braga
Marcelo Antonio Pinheiro Braga
BPBárbara M. F. Passos
Bárbara M. F. Passos
IFIuri Ferreira Felix
Iuri Ferreira Felix
Christopher Vincent DeSimoneChristopher Vincent DeSimone
Christopher Vincent DeSimone
Introduction: High-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional power delivery (CPD) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, its efficacy, procedural efficiency, and safety profile remain uncertain. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.Gov databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HPSD with CPD ablation for PVI in patients with AF. Random-effects models were used to pool hazard ratios (HR) and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). R version 4.4.2 was used for statistical analysis. Results: Seven RCTs with 1,006 patients (514 HPSD, 489 CPD) were included. No significant differences were found in freedom from arrhythmia during the follow-up period (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.41–1.45; p=0.424). AF recurrence did not differ (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.65–1.36; p=0.733) between groups. HPSD had a significantly shorter procedural (MD -22.61 min; 95% CI -33.18, -12.04; p<0.001) and RF ablation times (MD -15.70 min; 95% CI -20.86, -10.55; p<0.001). No differences were observed in fluoroscopy time and first-pass isolation for right and left pulmonary veins. There was no difference in esophageal lesion rates, pericardial, or neurological complications, but there was a higher incidence of steam pops in HPSD (RR 3.42; 95% CI 1.45–8.09; p=0.005). Conclusion: In patients with AF undergoing PVI, HPSD did not increase freedom from arrhythmia as compared with CPD ablation, however it was associated with shorter procedure and RF ablation times with a similar safety profile.