Most prediction schemes of milk protein secretion overestimate milk protein yield from dairy cows at high protein intakes, thereby overestimating milk protein yield response to protein supplementation. This study was conducted to determine factors contributing to such an overestimation. Using published studies, a database was constructed that was limited to amino acid (AA) infusion studies, as then only the digestible amino acid of dietary origin needed to be estimated, whereas the amount infused was known exactly, thereby reducing the dependence on estimated values. Although milk protein yield was positively related with total energy supply, and both digestible duodenal supply and infused AA, in this database there was no relationship between milk protein yield response above control treatments and the nutrient status of the cows (energy or protein). Total milk protein yield was defined as a function of individual AA supply, using a segmented-linear and a logistic model to obtain estimates of the efficiency of conversion of AA into milk protein. Except for Lys and Met supply, the segmented-linear model yielded lower root mean square error and better correlation, but both models were similar in their reliability. For both models, the estimated efficiency of conversion of AA to milk differed among AA. Estimations of the ideal profile of AA for lactating dairy cows were similar between models, with requirements for Lys and Met in line with 2001 National Research Council recommendations. The major difference is that the segmented-linear model yields a constant efficiency of conversion of an AA until requirements are met, with zero efficiency beyond this point. The logistic model allows for an estimation of the decreasing marginal efficiency of conversion of AA as the supply approaches the requirements. The use of variable efficiency factors should improve our ability to predict protein yield in response to supplemental protein.

A database reviewing the metabolism of nitrogen (N) compounds from absorption to milk has been compiled from 14 published and unpublished studies (33 treatments) that measured the net flux of N compounds across the splanchnic tissues in dairy cows. Apparent N digestibility averaged 0·65, with this then partitioned between 0·34 excreted in urine and 0·31 secreted as milk.Nitrogen metabolites are absorbed from the lumen of the gut into the portal vein, mainly as free amino acids (AA) and ammonia; these represented 0·58 and 0·57 of digested N, respectively. All of the ammonia absorbed was removed by the liver with, as a result, a net splanchnic flux of zero. Detoxification of ammonia by the liver and catabolism of AA results in production of urea as an end-product. Hepatic ureagenesis is a major cross-road in terms of whole body N exchange, being the equivalent of 0·81 of digested N. Therefore, salvage of a considerable part of this ureagenesis is needed to support milk protein synthesis. This salvage occurs via transfer of urea from the blood circulation into the lumen of the gut. On average, 0·47 of hepatic ureagenesis was returned to the gut via the portal-drained viscera (equivalent to 0·34 of digested N) with 0·56 of this then used for anabolic purposes e.g. as precursor N for microbial protein synthesis. On average, 0·65 of estimated digestible AA was recovered in the portal vein. This loss (0·35) is due to oxidation of certain AA across the gut wall and non-absorption of endogenous secretions. The magnitude of this loss is not uniform among AA and varies between less than 0·05 for histidine to more than 0·90 for some non-essential AA, such as glutamine.A second database (six studies, 14 treatments) was constructed to further examine the subsequent fate of absorbed essential AA. When all AA are aggregated, the liver removed, on average, 0·45 of portal absorption but this value hides the considerable variation between individual AA. Simplistically, the AA behave as two major groups: one group undergoes very little hepatic removal and includes the branched-chain AA and lysine. For the second group, removal varies between 0·35 and 0·50 of portal absorption, and includes histidine, methionine and phenylalanine. For both groups, however, the efficiency of transfer of absorbed AA into milk protein decreases with increasing supply of protein. This loss of efficiency is linked directly with increased hepatic removal of AA from the second group and, probably, increased catabolism by peripheral tissues, including the mammary gland, of AA from the first group. Therefore, we must stop using fixed factors of conversion of digestible AA to milk in our predictive schemes and acknowledge that metabolism of AA between delivery from the duodenum and conversion to milk protein will vary with nutrient supply. New information evolving from re-analysis of the literature and recent studies will allow better models to be devised for the prediction of nutrient-based responses by the lactating cow. Consideration of biological efficiency, rather than maximal milk yield, will lead to systems that are economically more sensible for the farmer and that have better environmental impacts.

The response of splanchnic tissue metabolism to different levels of metabolizable protein (MP) was measured in 6 catheterized multiparous lactating Holstein cows. Three diets, balanced to provide similar energy intakes and increasing amounts of MP (g/d)-1922 (low), 2264 (medium), and 2517 (high)-were fed during 21-d experimental periods according to a replicated Latin square. On d 18, 19, or 20, six hourly blood samples were collected simultaneously from the portal and hepatic veins plus an artery to determine net fluxes of nutrients across the portal-drained viscera and the liver. Yields of milk and protein increased, as did urinary N excretion with increasing MP. Portal absorption of essential amino acids (EAA) increased linearly with increasing MP supply, as did liver removal of His, Met, and Phe. In contrast, liver removal of the branched-chain AA (BCAA) and lysine was unaffected by diets. With increasing MP, the ratio of milk output to postliver supply of BCAA, Thr, and Lys decreased linearly, indicating oxidation of these AA in the peripheral tissues. Concomitant to a decreased catabolism of EAA in the liver (His, Met, Phe, and Thr) and/or in peripheral tissues (BCAA, Lys, and Thr), the efficiency of transfer of absorbed EAA into milk protein decreases markedly as protein supply increases. The efficiency of transfer of absorbed AA into milk also varies greatly between AA. These 2 important factors should be taken into account when building predictive schemes for milk protein output.

Improving the prediction of milk protein yield relies on knowledge of both protein supply and requirement. Definition of protein/amino acid supply in ruminants is a challenging task, due to feedstuff variety and variability and to the remodeling of nutrient intake by the rumen microflora. The questions arise, therefore, how and where should we measure the real supply of AA in the dairy cow? This review will follow the downstream flow of AA from duodenum to peripheral tissue delivery, with a glance at the efficiency of transfer into milk protein. Duodenal AA flow comprises rumen undegradable feed, microbial protein, and endogenous secretions. Most attention has been directed toward definition of the first two contributions but the latter fraction can represent as much as 20% of duodenal flow. More information is needed on what factors affect its magnitude and overall impact. Once digested, AA are absorbed into the portal vein. The ratio of portal absorption to small intestinal apparent digestion varies among essential AA, from 0.43 (threonine) to 0.76 (phenylalanine), due to the contributions of preduodenal endogenous secretions to the digestive flow, non-reabsorption of endogenous secretions and gut oxidation of AA. Few data are available on these phenomena in dairy cows but the evidence indicates that they alter the profile of AA available for anabolic purposes. Recent comparisons of estimated duodenal flux and measured portal flux have prompted a revisit of the NRC (2001) approach to estimate AA flows at the duodenum. Changes to the model are proposed that yield predictions that better fit the current knowledge of AA metabolism across the gut. After absorption, AA flow first to the liver where substantial and differential net removal occurs, varying from zero for the branched-chain AA to 50% of portal absorption for phenylalanine. This process alters the pattern of net supply to the mammary gland. Overall, intermediary metabolism of AA between the duodenum and the mammary gland biologically explains the decreased efficiency of the transfer of absorbed AA into milk protein as maximal yield is approached. Therefore, variable, rather than fixed, factors for transfer efficiencies must be incorporated into future predictive models.