Cancer is characterized by the uncontrolled division of cells, resulting in the formation of tumors. The tumor microenvironment (TME) consists of a variety of cell types present within a heterogeneous extracellular matrix (ECM). Current 2D culture methods for mimicking this microenvironment remain limited due to spatial constraints. Many different types of 3D cancer models have been developed in recent years using spheroids/organoids, biomaterial scaffolds, and cancer-on-chip systems. However, these models cannot precisely control the organization of multiple cell types inside of complex architectures. Bioprinted cancer models can incorporate both stromal and cancer cells inside of 3D constructs to generate custom models of this complex disease. 3D bioprinting can generate complex, multicellular, and reproducible constructs where the matrix composition and rigidity are tailored locally to the tumor. These capabilities make 3D bioprinting an attractive method for reproducing the tumor TME found in vivo. Recent advancements in biomaterial-based bioinks enable the generation of 3D bioprinted cancer models that accurately mimic the TM. Here we discuss recent examples of such 3D-bioprinted cancer models, including those of the lungs, prostate, skin, brain, and colon. We then highlight the advantages of using 3D bioprinting compared to other in vitro modeling techniques and detail its limitations.

Three-dimensional bioprinting can fabricate precisely controlled 3D tissue constructs. This process uses bioinks—specially tailored materials that support the survival of incorporated cells—to produce tissue constructs. The properties of bioinks, such as stiffness and porosity, should mimic those found in desired tissues to support specialized cell types. Previous studies by our group validated soft substrates for neuronal cultures using neural cells derived from human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs). It is important to confirm that these bioprinted tissues possess mechanical properties similar to native neural tissues. Here, we assessed the physical and mechanical properties of bioprinted constructs generated from our novel microsphere containing bioink. We measured the elastic moduli of bioprinted constructs with and without microspheres using a modified Hertz model. The storage and loss modulus, viscosity, and shear rates were also measured. Physical properties such as microstructure, porosity, swelling, and biodegradability were also analyzed. Our results showed that the elastic modulus of constructs with microspheres was 1032 ± 59.7 Pascal (Pa), and without microspheres was 728 ± 47.6 Pa. Mechanical strength and printability were significantly enhanced with the addition of microspheres. Thus, incorporating microspheres provides mechanical reinforcement, which indicates their suitability for future applications in neural tissue engineering.

Current treatments for neurodegenerative diseases aim to alleviate the symptoms experienced by patients; however, these treatments do not cure the disease nor prevent further degeneration. Improvements in current disease-modeling and drug-development practices could accelerate effective treatments for neurological diseases. To that end, 3D bioprinting has gained significant attention for engineering tissues in a rapid and reproducible fashion. Additionally, using patient-derived stem cells, which can be reprogrammed to neural-like cells, could generate personalized neural tissues. Here, adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were bioprinted using a fibrin-based bioink and the microfluidic RX1 bioprinter. These tissues were cultured for 12 days in the presence of SB431542 (SB), LDN-193189 (LDN), purmorphamine (puro), fibroblast growth factor 8 (FGF8), fibroblast growth factor-basic (bFGF), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) to induce differentiation to dopaminergic neurons (DN). The constructs were analyzed for expression of neural markers, dopamine release, and electrophysiological activity. The cells expressed DN-specific and early neuronal markers (tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and class III beta-tubulin (TUJ1), respectively) after 12 days of differentiation. Additionally, the tissues exhibited immature electrical signaling after treatment with potassium chloride (KCl). Overall, this work shows the potential of bioprinting engineered neural tissues from patient-derived MSCs, which could serve as an important tool for personalized disease models and drug-screening.

3D bioprinting can generate the organized structures found in human skin for a variety of biological, medical, and pharmaceutical applications. Challenges in bioprinting skin include printing different types of cells in the same construct while maintaining their viability, which depends on the type of bioprinter and bioinks used. This study evaluated a novel 3D bioprinted skin model containing human keratinocytes (HEKa) and human dermal fibroblasts (HDF) in co‐culture (CC) using a high‐viscosity fibrin‐based bioink produced using the BioX extrusion‐based bioprinter. The constructs containing HEKa or HDF cells alone (control groups) and in CC were evaluated at 1, 10, and 20 days after bioprinting for viability, immunocytochemistry for specific markers (K5 and K10 for keratinocytes; vimentin and fibroblast specific protein [FSP] for fibroblasts). The storage, loss modulus, and viscosity properties of the constructs were also assessed to compare the effects of keratinocytes and fibroblasts individually and combined, providing important insights when bioprinting skin. Our findings revealed significantly higher cell viability in the CC group compared to individual keratinocyte and fibroblast groups, suggesting the combined cell presence enhanced survival rates. Additionally, proliferation rates of both cell types remained consistent over time, indicating non‐competitive growth within the construct. Interestingly, keratinocytes exhibited a greater impact on the viscoelastic properties of the construct compared to fibroblasts, likely due to their larger size and arrangement. These insights contribute to optimizing bioprinting strategies for skin tissue engineering and emphasize the important role of different cell types in 3D skin models.

“Global warming” owing to the exponential rise of CO₂ has forced researchers to explore possibilities for limited release of CO₂. Sequestration of CO₂ and its utilization to produce industrially important products are potential solutions. High thermodynamic stability (–△H_f = -394 kJ/mol) of CO₂ is a bottleneck for its

“Global warming” owing to the exponential rise of CO₂ has forced researchers to explore possibilities for limited release of CO₂. Sequestration of CO₂ and its utilization to produce industrially important products are potential solutions. High thermodynamic stability (–△H_f = -394 kJ/mol) of CO₂ is a bottleneck for its