Eduardo Fernandez

Dr. Eduardo Fernandez

University of Liège, Belgium
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2020 in Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Eduardo FernandezEduardo Fernandez
Eduardo Fernandez
KYKai-Ke Yang
Kai-Ke Yang
SKStijn Koppen
Stijn Koppen
PAPablo Alarcón
Pablo Alarcón
SBSimon Bauduin
Simon Bauduin
PDPierre Duysinx
Pierre Duysinx

3 June 2019 in Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Eduardo FernandezEduardo Fernandez
Eduardo Fernandez
MCMaxime Collet
Maxime Collet
PAPablo Alarcón
Pablo Alarcón
SBSimon Bauduin
Simon Bauduin
PDPierre Duysinx
Pierre Duysinx

4 March 2021 in Virtual and Physical Prototyping
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Eduardo FernandezEduardo Fernandez
Eduardo Fernandez
CAC. Ayas
C. Ayas
MLM. Langelaar
M. Langelaar
PDP. Duysinx
P. Duysinx
Additive Manufacturing (AM) processes intended for large-scale components deposit large volumes of material to shorten process duration. This reduces the resolution of the AM process, which is typically defined by the deposition nozzle size. If the resolution limitation is not considered when designing for Large-Scale Additive Manufacturing (LSAM), difficulties can arise in the manufacturing process, which may require the adaptation of deposition parameters. This work incorporates the nozzle size constraint into Topology Optimisation (TO) in order to generate optimised designs suitable to the process resolution. This article proposes and compares two methods, which are based on existing TO techniques that enable control of minimum and maximum member size, and of minimum cavity size. The first method requires the minimum and maximum member size to be equal to the deposition nozzle size, thus design features of uniform width are obtained. The second method defines the size of solid members sufficiently small for the resulting structure to resemble a structural skeleton, which can be interpreted as the deposition path. Through filtering and projection techniques, the thin structures are thickened according to the chosen nozzle size. Thus, a topology tailored to the deposition nozzle size is obtained along with a deposition proposal. The methods are demonstrated and assessed using 2D and 3D benchmark problems.

28 October 2015 in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GPGonzalo Pincheira
Gonzalo Pincheira
CCCristian Canales
Cristian Canales
Carlos andres MedinaCarlos andres Medina
Carlos andres Medina
Eduardo FernandezEduardo Fernandez
Eduardo Fernandez
Paulo FloresPaulo Flores
Paulo Flores
This article is focused on the study of the contribution of aramid fibers in a hybrid carbon–aramid fiber twill weave used to reinforce epoxy resin. To evaluate the influence of the aramid fibers, a comparative study between carbon and carbon–aramid woven–reinforced composites, considering the mechanical behavior of both materials under several loading conditions, is performed. The tests used in this study are meant to analyze the effect of aramid reinforcements on the composite stiffness, strength, impact, and fracture performance. Higher values of energy absorption and fracture toughness were exhibited by the carbon–aramid composite. The mechanical tests performed indicated that the aramid phase present in the hybrid carbon–aramid composite induced an important enhancement on the impact (37.9% in energy absorption) and fracture resistance (12.7% for fracture initiation and 43% for steady state regime), compared to small reductions on the material stiffness. In addition, the ultimate strain and the through thickness compression strength were favorably affected, with an increase up to 19.5% and 8.3%, respectively, by the presence of aramid fiber that presents a more ductile response with respect to the carbon reinforcement.

28 November 2022 in Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TCThéodore Cherrière
Théodore Cherrière
LLLuc Laurent
Luc Laurent
SHSami Hlioui
Sami Hlioui
FLFrançois Louf
François Louf
PDPierre Duysinx
Pierre Duysinx
Eduardo FernandezEduardo Fernandez
Eduardo Fernandez

27 May 2019 in Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KYKaike Yang
Kaike Yang
Eduardo FernandezEduardo Fernandez
Eduardo Fernandez
CNCao Niu
Cao Niu
PDPierre Duysinx
Pierre Duysinx
JZJihong Zhu
Jihong Zhu
WZWeihong Zhang
Weihong Zhang