Elena Marshalko

Dr. Elena Marshalko

Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 April 2022 in Space Weather
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MKMikhail Kruglyakov
Mikhail Kruglyakov
AKAlexey Kuvshinov
Alexey Kuvshinov
EMElena Marshalko
Elena Marshalko
We present a methodology that allows researchers to simulate in real time the spatiotemporal dynamics of the ground electric field (GEF) in a given 3‐D conductivity model of the Earth based on continuously augmented data on the spatiotemporal evolution of the inducing source. The formalism relies on the factorization of the source by spatial modes (SM) and time series of respective expansion coefficients and exploits precomputed GEF kernels generated by corresponding SM. To validate the formalism, we invoke a high‐resolution 3‐D conductivity model of Fennoscandia and consider a realistic source built using the Spherical Elementary Current Systems (SECS) method as applied to magnetic field data from the International Monitor for Auroral Geomagnetic Effect network of observations. The factorization of the SECS‐recovered source is then performed using the principal component analysis. Eventually, we show that the GEF computation at a given time instant on a 512 × 512 grid requires less than 0.025 s provided that GEF kernels due to pre‐selected SM are computed in advance. Taking the 7–8 September 2017 geomagnetic storm as a space weather event, we show that real‐time high‐resolution 3‐D modeling of the GEF is feasible. This opens a practical opportunity for GEF (and eventually geomagnetically induced currents) nowcasting and forecasting.

13 September 2023 in Space Weather
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EMElena Marshalko
Elena Marshalko
MKMikhail Kruglyakov
Mikhail Kruglyakov
AKAlexey Kuvshinov
Alexey Kuvshinov
AVAri Viljanen
Ari Viljanen
In this study, we perform three‐dimensional (3‐D) ground electric field (GEF) modeling in Fennoscandia for three days of the Halloween geomagnetic storm (29–31 October 2003) using magnetic field data from the International Monitor for Auroral Geomagnetic Effects (IMAGE) magnetometer network and a 3‐D conductivity model of the region. To explore the influence of the inducing source model on 3‐D GEF simulations, we consider three different approaches to source approximation. Within the first two approaches, the source varies laterally, whereas in the third method, the GEF is calculated by implementing the time‐domain realization of the magnetotelluric intersite impedance method. We then compare GEF‐based geomagnetically induced current (GIC) with observations at the Mäntsälä natural gas pipeline recording point. We conclude that a high correlation between modeled and recorded GIC is observed for all considered approaches. The highest correlation is achieved when performing a 3‐D GEF simulation using a “conductivity‐based” laterally nonuniform inducing source. Our results also highlight the strong dependence of the GEF on the earth's conductivity distribution.

18 February 2021 in Space Weather
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EMElena Marshalko
Elena Marshalko
MKMikhail Kruglyakov
Mikhail Kruglyakov
AKAlexey Kuvshinov
Alexey Kuvshinov
LJLiisa Juusola
Liisa Juusola
NKNorah Kaggwa Kwagala
Norah Kaggwa Kwagala
VPVyacheslav A. Pilipenko
Vyacheslav A. Pilipenko
Ground‐based technological systems, such as power grids, can be affected by geomagnetically induced currents (GIC) during geomagnetic storms and magnetospheric substorms. This motivates the necessity to numerically simulate and, ultimately, forecast GIC. The prerequisite for the GIC modeling in the region of interest is the simulation of the ground geoelectric field (GEF) in the same region. The modeling of the GEF in its turn requires spatiotemporal specification of the source which generates the GEF, as well as an adequate regional model of the Earth’s electrical conductivity. In this paper, we compare results of the GEF (and ground magnetic field) simulations using three different source models. Two models represent the source as a laterally varying sheet current flowing above the Earth. The first model is constructed using the results of a physics‐based 3‐D magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulation of near‐Earth space, the second one uses ground‐based magnetometers’ data and the Spherical Elementary Current Systems (SECS) method. The third model is based on a “plane wave” approximation which assumes that the source is locally laterally uniform. Fennoscandia is chosen as a study region and the simulations are performed for the September 7–8, 2017 geomagnetic storm. We conclude that ground magnetic field perturbations are reproduced more accurately using the source constructed via the SECS method compared to the source obtained on the basis of MHD simulation outputs. We also show that the difference between the GEF modeled using laterally nonuniform source and plane wave approximation is substantial in Fennoscandia.

19 March 2020 in Space Weather
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EMElena Marshalko
Elena Marshalko
MKMikhail Kruglyakov
Mikhail Kruglyakov
AKAlexey Kuvshinov
Alexey Kuvshinov
BMBenjamin S. Murphy
Benjamin S. Murphy
LRLutz Rastätter
Lutz Rastätter
APAntti Pulkkinen
Antti Pulkkinen
The intensification of the fluctuating geomagnetic field during space weather events leads to generation of a strong electric field in the conducting earth, which drives geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) in grounded technological systems. GICs can severely affect the functioning of such infrastructure. The ability to realistically model the ground electric field (GEF) is important for understanding the space weather impact on technological systems. We present the results of three‐dimensional (3‐D) modeling of the GEF for the eastern United States during a geomagnetic storm of March 2015. The external source responsible for the storm is constructed using a 3‐D magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulation of near‐Earth space. We explore effects from conductivity contrasts for various conductivity models of the region, including a 3‐D model obtained from inversion of EarthScope magnetotelluric data. As expected, the GEF in the region is subject to a strong coastal effect. Remarkably, effects from landmass conductivity inhomogeneities are comparable to the coastal effect. These inhomogeneities significantly affect the integrated GEF. This result is of special importance since the computation of GICs relies on integrals of the GEF (voltages), but not on the GEF itself. Finally, we compare the GEF induced by a laterally varying (MHD) source with that calculated using the plane wave approximation and show that the difference is perceptible even in the regions that are commonly considered to be negligibly affected by lateral nonuniformity of the source. Overall, the difference increases toward the north of the model where effects from laterally variable high‐latitude external currents become substantial.

27 May 2025 in Annales Geophysicae
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LJLiisa Juusola
Liisa Juusola
HVHeikki Vanhamäki
Heikki Vanhamäki
EMElena Marshalko
Elena Marshalko
MKMikhail Kruglyakov
Mikhail Kruglyakov
AVAri Viljanen
Ari Viljanen
The geoelectric field drives geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) in technological conductor networks, which can affect the performance of critical ground infrastructure such as electric power transmission grids. The three-dimensional (3-D) electric field at the Earth's surface consists of an external divergence-free (DF) part due to temporally and spatially varying ionospheric and magnetospheric currents, an internal DF part due to temporally and spatially varying telluric currents, and a curl-free (CF) part due to charge accumulation at ground conductivity gradients. We have developed a new method for estimating these contributions. The external and internal parts of the DF electric field are calculated from the time derivative of the external and internal parts of the observed ground magnetic field, respectively, using DF two-dimensional (2-D) spherical elementary current systems (SECSs). The horizontal surface CF electric field is calculated from the known surface DF electric field using coefficients that linearly relate the DF electric field to the CF electric field. The coefficients were obtained from the 3-D induction model PGIEM2G (Polynomial Galerkin Integral Equation Modelling in ElectroMagnetic Geophysics). The calculations are carried out in the time domain, and only two consecutive time steps of the observed magnetic field are needed to compute the surface electric field. The external part of the DF electric field is valid at and below the ionosphere, the internal part at and above the Earth's surface, and the CF part at the Earth's surface. A dense magnetometer network is a requirement for reliable results. The external and internal parts of the DF electric field are generally oppositely directed and have comparable amplitudes, both on the ground and in the ionosphere, indicating that both contributions are significant for the total DF electric field. The largest peaks of the total DF electric field tend to occur when either the external or internal contribution is temporarily suppressed. At a given location, a DF electric field with a given amplitude can result in a total surface electric field amplitude with a difference of orders of magnitude depending on the direction of the DF electric field with respect to the locally dominant conductivity gradient structure. The electric field calculation is computationally light, facilitating operational implementation of a near-real-time 3-D surface electric field monitoring and derivation of long electric field time series.

20 October 2023 in Space Weather
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MKMikhail Kruglyakov
Mikhail Kruglyakov
EMElena Marshalko
Elena Marshalko
AKAlexey Kuvshinov
Alexey Kuvshinov
MSMaxim Smirnov
Maxim Smirnov
AVAri Viljanen
Ari Viljanen
We propose a novel approach to model the ground electric field (GEF) induced by laterally‐nonuniform ionospheric sources in real time. The approach exploits the multi‐site transfer function concept, continuous magnetic field measurements at multiple sites in the region of interest, and spatial modes describing the ionospheric source. We compared the modeled GEFs with those measured at two locations in Fennoscandia and observed good agreement between modeled and measured GEF. Besides, we compared GEF‐based geomagnetically induced current (GIC) with that measured at the Mäntsälä natural gas pipeline recording point and again observed remarkable agreement between modeled and measured GIC.