Background: The localization of the additional canal orifice is one of the primary factors influencing the success of endodontic treatment. To deal with this problem, several techniques that each have their own advantages and disadvantages have been discussed in the literature. Objectives: The aim of the present in vitro study was to review a new approach to localizing second mesiobuccal (MB2) canals in maxillary first molars using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Patients and Methods: The CBCT scans of 296 patients who were referred to the department of dentomaxillofacial radiology were included in the study. The presence of MB2 canals, the angle formed by the mesiobuccal, distobuccal, and palatal root canal orifices (∠MDP), and the angle formed by the mesiobuccal, distobuccal, and MB2 canal orifices (∠MDMB2) were evaluated on the axial section. Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression methods were used for all predictions. All of the analyses were performed using SPSS for windows version 22.0. A two-sided P value < 0.05 was defined as statistically significant. Results: Of the 468 first molars, MB2 canals were observed in 296 subjects (141 females and 155 males). There were no statistically significant differences between females and males (P = 0.300). The ∠MDP and ∠MDMB2 were detected and evaluated. A moderate positive correlation was found between the ∠MDP and the ∠MDMB2. To predict the ∠MDMB2 values, it was shown that the ∠MDMB2 increased by 0.420 degrees when the ∠MDP increased by 1 degree. If the ∠MDP was greater than 90.95 degrees, there was a 78% probability that MB2 canals could be found. Conclusion: The determination of the presence of MB2 in the maxillary first molars may be carried out using CBCT scans. If the ∠MDP was 91 degrees or greater, there was considered to be a higher probability that MB2 canals would be found in the endodontic cavity. Due to the positive correlation between the ∠MDP and the ∠MDMB2, the localization of MB2 canals may be easily performed in relation to the main MB canal. Keywords: Cone Beam Computed Tomography; Root Canal Therapy; Endodontics

Extrusion of intracanal bacteria leads to treatment failures. Compare the apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria (Enterococcus faecalis) during canal preparation with three different instrumentation techniques [RECIPROC, One Shape (OS), and Twisted-File Adaptive (TFA)] with different motion types. Ninety teeth with different canal morphologies were divided into three main groups, each including 30 teeth (10 mandibular incisors, 10 mandibular premolars, and 10 curved roots). Roots were resected until 13-mm working length was obtained and fixed to glass vials filled with brain-heart infusion broth. Each canal was filled with E. faecalis suspension. The three main groups were further grouped into three subgroups. Each group was further subgrouped into three, with each subgroup including 10 roots from each type of teeth (10 incisors/subgroup, 10 premolars/subgroup, and 10 curved canals/subgroup). These subgroups were prepared with one of RECIPROC, OS, or TFA. Bacterial colonies extruded into each vial were incubated in brain-heart infusion agar at 37°C for 5 days and counted using a colony counter as the number of colony-forming units per milliliter. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way analysis of variance, post hoc Tukey honest significant difference, and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Apically extruded bacteria were not statistically different from each other (P > 0.05). The amount of apically extruded bacteria was statistically similar for both different instruments in the same type of tooth (P > 0.05) and same instrument in different types of teeth (P > 0.05). Neither the motion type of instrument nor the canal morphology affected the degree of bacterial extrusion.

Performance of the Working Length Determination using Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Radiography and Electronic Apex Locator, in Comparisons to Actual Length - Iranian Journal of Radiology - - Kowsar

This in vitro study aimed to compare the dentinal tubule penetration of a conventional epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus) and two bioceramic-based sealers