Background/Objectives: Genomic profiling guides treatment in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), yet country-level data from Türkiye remain limited. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with mNSCLC diagnosed between January 2018 and March 2025 across tertiary centers in all seven regions. Variables included demographics, smoking, histology, testing modality (single-gene vs. next-generation sequencing [NGS]), targetable genomic alterations (TGAs) and co-mutations, and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score. Results: Among 1023 patients (mean age 64 years; 76.4% male), tobacco exposure was frequent (mean 42.1 pack-years); 16.9% were never-smokers. NGS use increased over time, exceeding 90% by 2025. TGAs were detected in 28.3% (EGFR 16.0%, ALK 5.0%, KRAS G12C 2.6%, BRAF V600E 3.2%; ROS1, MET exon 14, HER2, NTRK ≤ 2.5%; no RET). EGFR alterations occurred in 19% of non-squamous carcinomas and 6% of squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), suggesting an intermediate East–West pattern. Among NGS-tested samples, TP53 was the most frequent co-mutation (33.1%), followed by alterations in CDKN2A, PIK3CA, FGFR, STK11, and KEAP1. Conclusions: In this large, multicenter Turkish real-world cohort, the TGA spectrum broadly mirrors global patterns while revealing local nuances; EGFR mutations were more frequent than expected in SCC, and nationwide NGS adoption is accelerating. Limitations include retrospective design, non-centralized PD-L1 testing, and missing data. Prospective, standardized studies integrating outcomes and resistance mechanisms are warranted to refine regional precision oncology.

Background: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved survival in advanced melanoma, predicting individual responses remains challenging; thus, practical and inexpensive biomarkers are needed. In this study, we investigated the prognostic value of the neutrophil percentage–albumin ratio (NPAR) in patients with advanced melanoma receiving ICI therapy. Methods: Fifty patients treated in our clinic were included, with a mean age of 53.3 years and 66% being male. Visceral metastases were present in 76% of the cohort. Through conducting Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis, we determined an NPAR cut-off value of 1.81, with patients categorized into low (<1.81, n = 27)- and high (≥1.81, n = 23)-NPAR groups. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses. Results: High NPAR (≥1.81) significantly shortened both PFS and OS. In the univariate analysis, high NPAR emerged as a strong risk factor for PFS (HR: 2.68, p = 0.002) and OS (HR: 3.70, p < 0.001), while multivariate analysis confirmed NPAR as an independent negative prognostic factor for PFS (HR: 2.45, p = 0.006) and OS (HR: 2.82, p = 0.003), regardless of clinical variables. Additionally, visceral metastasis was an independent negative predictor of survival. Conclusions: Pre-treatment NPAR levels may be an independent and potential predictor of survival in advanced melanoma patients receiving ICIs. This easily calculable ratio could provide a practical guide for risk stratification.