The purpose was to assess the effects of three interventions on bone mineral density (BMD) to prevent the onset or progression of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Specifically, thirty-nine postmenopausal women, diagnosed with osteopenia or osteoporosis, implemented either high-impact training (G1), the same training + calcium and vitamin D intake (G2), or walked at an intense pace + calcium and vitamin D (G3). Baseline change (BC) in BMD was estimated using the femoral neck and lumbar spine T-scores. Participants were classified as having suffered fractures and/or falls before (24-month) and during the 2-year intervention. The participants—aged 61.8 years—were allocated into G1 (n = 9), G2 (n = 16), and G3 (n = 14). The groups evolved similarly over time; however, participants in G2 exhibited the largest T-score improvements with BC over 20%. G1 and G3 maintained BMD levels (BC = −7 to 13.3%; p > 0.05). Falls occurred similarly across the interventions, while the participants in G2 had the lowest percentage of fracture events (p = 0.037). Overall, the findings suggest that regular physical exercise may be effective in maintaining or improving BMD in postmenopausal women presenting with osteopenia or osteoporosis. Due to the limited sample size, the results are preliminary and warrant future randomized trials to validate the findings.

This dataset presents human foot joints kinematics and kinetics data during walking, classified by static foot posture, filling a gap in existing lower limb databases that lack data on foot joints beyond the ankle or on static posture data, despite its link to foot and lower limb pathologies. Kinematics were recorded using a three-dimensional mocap system, and kinetics through a pressure platform, employing a multi-segment foot model including the ankle, midtarsal and first metatarsophalangeal joint. The dataset contains 350 recordings of right foot joint angles and moments and contact pressures from 70 healthy subjects with varying static posture (highly pronated, highly supinated and normal). Data were collected at 100 Hz, filtered and resampled to 100 frames throughout the stance phase. Descriptive data are also provided: age, weight, height, BMI and foot anthropometric data and foot posture index. Plots, tables and ANOVAs are included for validation. Presented in .xlsx and .mat formats, this database can assist professionals in corrective footwear design, insole customization, surgical planning, and evaluating interventions on foot dynamics.

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to compare gait patterns between young adults and physically active older adults. Additionally, the relation between these parameters and age was explored. Materials and Methods: Transversal case and control study, recruiting 81 participants divided into two groups: young adults (18–45 years) and physically active older adults (60+ years). Participants were assessed using the PodoSmart Insole^® system, which recorded spatiotemporal and kinematic gait data. Gait parameters were measured during a self-selected walking test. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, t-tests for group comparisons, and Pearson’s correlation to explore relationships between age and gait parameters. Results: Significant differences in gait parameters were found between young and older adults, particularly in stride length (right foot: p = 0.009, left foot: p = 0.001), cadence (p < 0.001), contact time (p < 0.001), swing time (p < 0.001), and support phase duration (p < 0.001), with moderate to large effect sizes. Sex differences were also observed within each group for several gait variables. Correlation analysis evidenced worsened parameters with increasing age, with moderate to strong associations in terms of cadence (r = −0.590), contact time (r = −0.504, r = −0.462), swing time (r = −0.662), and support phase duration (r = −0.524, r = −0.439). Conclusions: Evident differences in gait parameters are observed between young adults and active older adults. Although these results follow the trend of previous studies that employed more sophisticated lab-based protocols for gait analysis, slight differences between our study and these others could be attributed to the regular physical activity performed by these participants, which should be explored in more detail in future studies.

The first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) and the first ray are crucial in walking, particularly during propulsion. Limitation in this joint’s sagittal plane motion, known as hallux limitus, can cause compensatory movements in other joints. Some studies assessed the impact of various foot orthoses designs on the foot biomechanics; however, a comprehensive understanding is lacking. This study compared the effects of two custom-made foot orthoses (CFOs) on the foot joint kinematics and kinetics in patients with structural hallux limitus (SHL). In this quasi-experimental study, 24 patients with hallux limitus were assessed in three conditions: (i) barefoot, (ii) shod with a cut-out custom foot orthosis (cut-out CFO), and (iii) shod with an anterior forefoot-stabilized element custom foot orthosis (AFSE CFO), fitted into a minimalist neoprene shoe. Multi-segment foot kinematics and kinetics were assessed during the stance phase of the gait. A decrease in ankle and midfoot inversion, as well as in ankle plantarflexion, was found in both orthotic conditions. Regarding the first MTPJ, a greater dorsiflexion was observed with the patient being barefoot compared to both of the conditions under study. From the current finding, it should be concluded that neither of the custom foot orthoses produced the predefined functional effects.