Erwin Oh

Prof. Erwin Oh

Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2012 in Soils and Foundations
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CSChanaton Surarak
Chanaton Surarak
SLSuched Likitlersuang
Suched Likitlersuang
Dariusz WanatowskiDariusz Wanatowski
Dariusz Wanatowski
ABArumugam Balasubramaniam
Arumugam Balasubramaniam
Erwin OhErwin Oh
Erwin Oh
HGHong Guan
Hong Guan

1 October 2013 in Soils and Foundations
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SLSuched Likitlersuang
Suched Likitlersuang
CSChanaton Surarak
Chanaton Surarak
Dariusz WanatowskiDariusz Wanatowski
Dariusz Wanatowski
Erwin OhErwin Oh
Erwin Oh
ABArumugam Balasubramaniam
Arumugam Balasubramaniam

1 August 2013 in Soils and Foundations
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SLSuched Likitlersuang
Suched Likitlersuang
STSupot Teachavorasinskun
Supot Teachavorasinskun
CSChanaton Surarak
Chanaton Surarak
Erwin OhErwin Oh
Erwin Oh
ABArumugam Balasubramaniam
Arumugam Balasubramaniam

26 November 2013 in Traffic Injury Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Xiaobo QuXiaobo Qu
Xiaobo Qu
YKYan Kuang
Yan Kuang
Erwin OhErwin Oh
Erwin Oh
Sheng JinSheng Jin
Sheng Jin
Objective: This article is to assess the performance of 3 macroscopic safety indicators (speed, speed dispersion, and volume) and two microscopic potential crash risks (time to collision and deceleration rate to avoid crash) on safety evaluation for expressways. Methods: Field data were collected at 3 locations for 4 different time periods on an expressway in Beijing, China. The speed of each vehicle, headway time, and vehicle length were recorded by a traffic management system. The 5 safety indicators were thus calibrated on the basis of the collected data. Further, consistency and comparative analyses were applied to assess the performance of indicators. Results: According to the analyses, speed dispersion was a better predictor of the two microscopic potential risks compared to the two macroscopic indicators. Conclusions: Speed dispersion is recommended to proactively assess road safety because (1) it provides consistent risk evaluation with microscopic potential risks and (2) it makes data collection easier.

10 May 2022 in Buildings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ayaz Ahmad KhanAyaz Ahmad Khan
Ayaz Ahmad Khan
RYRongrong Yu
Rongrong Yu
TLTingting Liu
Tingting Liu
HGHong Guan
Hong Guan
Erwin OhErwin Oh
Erwin Oh
This study features the development of a framework to identify drivers towards increasing adoption of modular integrated construction (MiC) methods for affordable sustainable housing (ASH). The rise of offsite construction (OSC) techniques, especially MiC, has been evident in recent years. MiC’s adoption in ASH is still underdeveloped; however, due to various benefits of MiC over conventional construction methods, it is envisioned to be a significant emerging approach for tackling growing housing demand, and ASH in particular. Although a few prior studies identified some factors for utilization of MiC towards ASH, studies to date have not provided a holistic review of drivers or a comprehensive framework of the interrelationships between such drivers. To address this issue, this study utilizes a three-way process including a systematic literature review, semi-structured interviews and the Total Interpretive Structure Modelling (TISM) method to study the drivers for MiC adoption in ASH. Initially, 111 drivers were extracted from a review of 40 studies in the existing literature. Following that, the significant drivers of MiC adoption for ASH were grouped into cost, time, productivity, quality, environmental, social, policy and demand. Drawing on concepts of systems thinking and graph theory, the TISM model for eight drivers was developed from both the literature review and the interview results. Four levels of hierarchy were found among drivers containing linkage, driving, depending and autonomous. Succeeding the steps of TISM and Reachability Matrix (RM) and Matrice d’ Impacts Croises-Multipication Appliqué a Classement (MICMAC) analysis, social drivers were found to have the highest driving and lowest dependency power, followed by productivity and policy drivers. This signifies the importance of social factors for enhancing MiC adoption for ASH. In addition, a strategic framework of boosting MiC adoption in ASH is also presented, highlighting the key stakeholders and strategies for transformation along with conclusions. This study delivers a wider landscape of drivers for MiC-ASH synergy that may assist practitioners, policy makers and relevant stakeholders to better understand the relationships between the drivers.

1 December 2014 in Geotechnical Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SLSuched Likitlersuang
Suched Likitlersuang
CSChanaton Surarak
Chanaton Surarak
SSSuchatvee Suwansawat
Suchatvee Suwansawat
DWDariusz Wanatowski
Dariusz Wanatowski
Erwin OhErwin Oh
Erwin Oh
ABArumugam Balasubramaniam
Arumugam Balasubramaniam
Tunnelling-induced ground surface settlement prediction still adopts empirical and analytical approaches; thus a step further in using a practical numerical analysis is now a challenging task. Because the deformation during tunnelling is a three-dimensional problem, several features were incorporated in two-dimensional analyses to capture aspects that are important in governing behaviour in the missing third dimension. This paper aims to present simplified methods for ground settlement computation of tunnelling works using the PLAXIS finite-element programme. Three simplified methods – contraction ratio, stress reduction and modified grout pressure – were considered in this study. Practical application requires correlations among these three methods. Such correlations among the three methods are proposed in this study and can be used in geotechnical practice. The results were based on a series of finite-element analyses of the Blue Line Bangkok Mass Rapid Transit tunnels. The geotechnical parameters were selected based on soil investigation reports carried out for construction purposes. The soil constitutive model adopted herein was the hardening soil model on soft and stiff clays. All the finite-element simulations were compared with the measured field deformations. Therefore, the analysis results can be considered as a Class-C prediction (back-analysis).