Esther De Vries

Dr. Esther De Vries

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2008 in Gastroenterology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AVAnnemarie C. de Vries
Annemarie C. de Vries
NGNicole C.T. van Grieken
Nicole C.T. van Grieken
CLCaspar W.N. Looman
Caspar W.N. Looman
MCMariël K. Casparie
Mariël K. Casparie
EVEsther De Vries
Esther De Vries
EKErnst J. Kuipers
Ernst J. Kuipers
Background & Aims: A cascade of precursor lesions (eg, atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, and dysplasia) precedes most gastric adenocarcinomas. Quantification of gastric cancer risk in patients with premalignant gastric lesions is unclear, however. Consequently, endoscopic surveillance is controversial, especially in Western populations. Methods: To analyze current surveillance practice and gastric cancer risk in patients with premalignant gastric lesions, all patients with a first diagnosis between 1991 and 2004 were identified in the Dutch nationwide histopathology registry (PALGA); follow-up data were evaluated until December 2005. Results: In total, 22,365 (24%) patients were diagnosed with atrophic gastritis, 61,707 (67%) with intestinal metaplasia, 7616 (8%) with mild-to-moderate dysplasia, and 562 (0.6%) with severe dysplasia. Patients with a diagnosis of atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, or mild-to-moderate dysplasia received re-evaluation in 26%, 28%, and 38% of cases, respectively, compared with 61% after a diagnosis of severe dysplasia (P < .001). The annual incidence of gastric cancer was 0.1% for patients with atrophic gastritis, 0.25% for intestinal metaplasia, 0.6% for mild-to-moderate dysplasia, and 6% for severe dysplasia within 5 years after diagnosis. Risk factors for gastric cancer development were increasing severity of premalignant gastric lesions at initial diagnosis (eg, severe dysplasia, hazard ratio 40.14, 95% confidence interval 32.2–50.1), increased age (eg, 75–84 years, hazard ratio 3.75, 95% confidence interval 2.8–5.1), and male gender (hazard ratio 1.50, 95% CI 1.3–1.7). Conclusions: Patients with premalignant gastric lesions are at considerable risk of gastric cancer. As current surveillance of these patients is inconsistent with their cancer risk, development of guidelines is indicated.

1 July 2008 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HKHenrike E. Karim-Kos
Henrike E. Karim-Kos
EVEsther De Vries
Esther De Vries
ISIsabelle Soerjomataram
Isabelle Soerjomataram
VLValery Lemmens
Valery Lemmens
SSSabine Siesling
Sabine Siesling
JCJan Willem W. Coebergh
Jan Willem W. Coebergh

13 August 2003 in International Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EVEsther De Vries
Esther De Vries
FBFreddie I. Bray
Freddie I. Bray
JCJan Willem W. Coebergh
Jan Willem W. Coebergh
DPDonald M. Parkin
Donald M. Parkin
EREuropean Network Of Cancer Registries
European Network Of Cancer Registries
We analyzed time trends in incidence of and mortality from malignant cutaneous melanoma in European populations since 1953. Data were extracted from the EUROCIM database of incidence data from 165 cancer registries. Mortality data were derived from the WHO database. During the 1990s, incidence rates were by far highest in northern and western Europe, whereas mortality was higher in males in eastern and southern Europe. Melanoma rates have been rising steadily, albeit with substantial geographic variation. In northern Europe, a deceleration in these trends occurred recently in persons aged under 70. Joinpoint analyses indicated that changes in these trends took place in the early 1980s. In western Europe, mortality rates have also recently leveled off [estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) from −13.6% (n.s.) to 3.3%], whereas in eastern and southern Europe both incidence and mortality rates are still increasing [incidence EAPCs 2.3–8.9%, mortality EAPCs −1.8% (n.s.) to 7.2%]. Models including the effects of age, period and birth cohort were required to adequately describe the rising incidence trends in most European populations, with a few exceptions. Time trends in mortality were adequately summarized on fitting either an age‐cohort model (with the leveling off of rates starting in birth cohorts between 1930 and 1940) or an age‐period‐cohort model. The most plausible explanations for the deceleration or decline in the incidence and mortality trends in recent years in northern (and to a lesser extent western) Europe are earlier detection and more frequent excision of pigmented lesions and a growing public awareness of the dangers of excessive sunbathing.

5 July 2009 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSSimon N Stacey
Simon N Stacey
PSPatrick Sulem
Patrick Sulem
GMGisli Masson
Gisli Masson
SGSigurjon A Gudjonsson
Sigurjon A Gudjonsson
GTGudmar Thorleifsson
Gudmar Thorleifsson
KSKari Stefansson
Kari Stefansson

1 April 2009 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMA. Micheli
A. Micheli
RCR. Ciampichini
R. Ciampichini
WOW. Oberaigner
W. Oberaigner
LCL. Ciccolallo
L. Ciccolallo
EVEsther De Vries
Esther De Vries
RAR. De Angelis
R. De Angelis

1 December 2015 in Cancer Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JSJoachim Schüz
Joachim Schüz
CECarolina Espina
Carolina Espina
PVPatricia Villain
Patricia Villain
RHRolando Herrero
Rolando Herrero
MLMaria E. Leon
Maria E. Leon
TLTracy Lignini
Tracy Lignini
This overview describes the principles of the 4th edition of the European Code against Cancer and provides an introduction to the 12 recommendations to reduce cancer risk. Among the 504.6 million inhabitants of the member states of the European Union (EU28), there are annually 2.64 million new cancer cases and 1.28 million deaths from cancer. It is estimated that this cancer burden could be reduced by up to one half if scientific knowledge on causes of cancer could be translated into successful prevention. The Code is a preventive tool aimed to reduce the cancer burden by informing people how to avoid or reduce carcinogenic exposures, adopt behaviours to reduce the cancer risk, or to participate in organised intervention programmes. The Code should also form a base to guide national health policies in cancer prevention. The 12 recommendations are: not smoking or using other tobacco products; avoiding second-hand smoke; being a healthy body weight; encouraging physical activity; having a healthy diet; limiting alcohol consumption, with not drinking alcohol being better for cancer prevention; avoiding too much exposure to ultraviolet radiation; avoiding cancer-causing agents at the workplace; reducing exposure to high levels of radon; encouraging breastfeeding; limiting the use of hormone replacement therapy; participating in organised vaccination programmes against hepatitis B for newborns and human papillomavirus for girls; and participating in organised screening programmes for bowel cancer, breast cancer, and cervical cancer.