farah savina

Mrs. farah savina

ISMO CNRS UMR 8214
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XYXiaomin Yang
Xiaomin Yang
DLDaniela Edith Salado Leza
Daniela Edith Salado Leza
erika porcelerika porcel
erika porcel
César GonzálezCésar González
César González
FSfarah savina
farah savina
Sandrine LacombeSandrine Lacombe
Sandrine Lacombe
Nanomedicine has stepped into the spotlight of radiation therapy over the last two decades. Nanoparticles (NPs), especially metallic NPs, can potentiate radiotherapy by specific accumulation into tumors, thus enhancing the efficacy while alleviating the toxicity of radiotherapy. Water radiolysis is a simple, fast and environmentally-friendly method to prepare highly controllable metallic nanoparticles in large scale. In this study, we used this method to prepare biocompatible PEGylated (with Poly(Ethylene Glycol) diamine) platinum nanoflowers (Pt NFs). These nanoagents provide unique surface chemistry, which allows functionalization with various molecules such as fluorescent markers, drugs or radionuclides. The Pt NFs were produced with a controlled aggregation of small Pt subunits through a combination of grafted polymers and radiation-induced polymer cross-linking. Confocal microscopy and fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy revealed that Pt NFs were localized in the cytoplasm of cervical cancer cells (HeLa) but not in the nucleus. Clonogenic assays revealed that Pt NFs amplify the gamma rays induced killing of HeLa cells with a sensitizing enhancement ratio (SER) of 23%, thus making them promising candidates for future cancer radiation therapy. Furthermore, the efficiency of Pt NFs to induce nanoscopic biomolecular damage by interacting with gamma rays, was evaluated using plasmids as molecular probe. These findings show that the Pt NFs are efficient nano-radio-enhancers. Finally, these NFs could be used to improve not only the performances of radiation therapy treatments but also drug delivery and/or diagnosis when functionalized with various molecules.

15 September 2022 in Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XYXiaomin Yang
Xiaomin Yang
VTVu Long Tran
Vu Long Tran
HRHynd Remita
Hynd Remita
FSfarah savina
farah savina
CDCaroline Denis
Caroline Denis
CTCharles Truillet
Charles Truillet

30 September 2026 in Small
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CSCathyanne Schott
Cathyanne Schott
FFFoutina Feghali
Foutina Feghali
MTMarine Gerbé de Thoré
Marine Gerbé de Thoré
AJAmina Joudat
Amina Joudat
LMLydia Meziani
Lydia Meziani
PMPauline Maury
Pauline Maury
Metallic nanoparticles (NPs) and ultra‐high dose rate (UHDR, FLASH) irradiation are being developed to widen the therapeutic index of radiotherapy, but their interaction remains poorly defined. We assessed PEGylated platinum nanoparticles (Pt‐NPs) in 4T1 tumor spheroids and syngeneic 4T1 and MC38 mouse models exposed to conventional (CONV, 0.125 Gy/s) or UHDR electron irradiation (∼200 Gy/s mean dose rate). Pt‐NPs penetrated throughout 4T1 spheroids and were mainly cytoplasmic. In clonogenic assays, Pt‐NPs increased radiation‐induced loss of reproductive capacity under both dose‐rate conditions. LQ analysis suggested dose‐dependent divergence between modalities, with significantly greater radioenhancement under UHDR only at 12 Gy (SER: 65.9% vs 40.8%, ΔSER = 25.1 percentage points, 95% CI, 2.1–48.1, p = 0.034). Pt‐NPs did not measurably alter apoptosis or γ‐H2AX kinetics. Micro‐CT confirmed intratumoral platinum at irradiation, but in vivo responses were heterogeneous. Pt‐NPs did not improve tumor control in the poorly immunogenic 4T1 model. In the more radiosensitive MC38 model, Pt‐NPs showed a nonsignificant trend toward improved tumor control and survival under CONV, with no comparable UHDR benefit. These findings identify an in vitro‐to‐in vivo disconnect and show that NP radioenhancement cannot be assumed to translate across dose‐rate regimens, tumor models, or host backgrounds.