Fred Edmond Boafo

Dr. Fred Edmond Boafo

Green Energy Technology Research Center
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 June 2016 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FBFred Edmond Boafo
Fred Edmond Boafo
Jin-Hee KimJin-Hee Kim
Jin-Hee Kim
Jun-Tae KimJun-Tae Kim
Jun-Tae Kim
Even though tightened building energy efficiency standards are implemented periodically in many countries, existing buildings continually consume a momentous quota of the total primary energy. Energy efficiency solutions range from material components to bulk systems. A technique of building construction, referred to as prefabricated architecture (prefab), is increasing in reputation. Prefab encompasses the offsite fabrication of building components to a greater degree of finish as bulk building structures and systems, and their assembly on-site. In this context, prefab improves the speed of construction, quality of architecture, efficiency of materials, and worker safety, while limiting environmental impacts of construction, as compared to conventional site-built construction practices. Quite recently, a 57 story skyscraper was built in 19 days using prefabricated modules. From the building physics point of view, the bulk systems and tighter integration method of prefab minimizes thermal bridges. This study seeks to clearly characterize the levels of prefab and to investigate the performance of modular prefab; considering acoustic constrain, seismic resistance, thermal behavior, energy consumption, and life cycle analysis of existing prefab cases and, thus, provides a dynamic case study-based review. Generally, prefab can be categorized into components, panels (2D), modules (3D), hybrids, and unitized whole buildings. On average, greenhouse gas emissions from conventional construction were higher than for modular construction, not discounting some individual discrepancies. Few studies have focused on monitored data on prefab and occupants’ comfort but additional studies are required to understand the public’s perception of the technology. The scope of the work examined will be of interest to building engineers, manufacturers, and energy experts, as well as serve as a foundational reference for future study.

23 December 2016 in International Journal of Green Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FBFred Edmond Boafo
Fred Edmond Boafo
Jun-Tae KimJun-Tae Kim
Jun-Tae Kim
JKJin-Hee Kim
Jin-Hee Kim
The performance of the building envelope predominantly determines the ultimate energy performance throughout the lifecycle of a building. A sustainable alternative to enhance roof performance while limiting heat flux through a roof is integrating passive techniques such as green roof. Particularly, green roof performance is sensitive to local climate. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the evapotranspiration effect of an extensive green roof on annual energy consumption of an office building in relation to the humid continental climate of Republic of Korea. The dynamic behavior of green roof and building energy performance were investigated through a parametric simulation method using green roof module in EnergyPlus coupled with jEPlus. Structural data of the reference building and ASHARE 90.1-2007 operational schedules were used as inputs for baseline building model while inputs for the green roof module were based on experimental data sets. Due to the influence of the humid conditions and local wind current on the evapotranspiration process, it was generally found that high leaf area index (LAI) reduced cooling energy demand and somewhat reduced heating energy demand as well; corresponding to the highest daily evapotranspiration fluxes of 4.79 mm day−1 in summer and 1.80 mm day−1 in winter. Increasing LAI from 20% to 100% cover increased evapotranspiration flux by 10.4% in summer and 80.2% in winter. Thus to minimize energy losses in winter, foliage cover must be carefully considered. Within limitations specified, the overall annual building energy consumption deceased by 90.9 GJ (3.7%).

1 December 2014 in Energy and Buildings
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FBFred Edmond Boafo
Fred Edmond Boafo
ZCZhaofeng Chen
Zhaofeng Chen
CLChengdong Li
Chengdong Li
BLBinbin Li
Binbin Li
TXTengzhou Xu
Tengzhou Xu

1 September 2013 in Materials & Design (1980-2015)
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CLCheng-Dong Li
Cheng-Dong Li
ZDZheng-Cai Duan
Zheng-Cai Duan
QCQing Chen
Qing Chen
ZCZhao-Feng Chen
Zhao-Feng Chen
FBFred Edmond Boafo
Fred Edmond Boafo
JZJie-Ming Zhou
Jie-Ming Zhou

1 December 2012 in Materials Science and Engineering: A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YLYong Liu
Yong Liu
ZCZhaofeng Chen
Zhaofeng Chen
JZJianxun Zhu
Jianxun Zhu
YJYun Jiang
Yun Jiang
BLBinbin Li
Binbin Li
FBFred Edmond Boafo
Fred Edmond Boafo

1 November 2015 in Energy Procedia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FBFred Edmond Boafo
Fred Edmond Boafo
JAJong-Gwon Ahn
Jong-Gwon Ahn
JKJun-Tae Kim
Jun-Tae Kim
JKJin-Hee Kim
Jin-Hee Kim
A high-performance insulation solution, such as vacuum insulation panel (VIP) reduces heat losses in a retrofitted building envelope. However, discontinuity of insulation material causes thermal bridges. A significant thermal bridge effect at the edge of VIP must be taken into account in the overall heat transfer coefficient (U-value) calculation; but is often omitted due to difficulties especially with numerical calculations. This study describes a modeling approach used to accurately evaluate the effect of thermal bridges on the overall U-value of building envelope. The thermal bridge and U-value were modeled and computed respectively using DesignBuilder which is based on EnergyPlus dynamic simulation engine. Correlation was drawn between experimentally determined U-value of VIP retrofitted building walls and the principal computation parameter