Fiona J. Clarke

Mrs. Fiona J. Clarke

University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
KMKirsten McEwan
Kirsten McEwan
MRMiles Richardson
Miles Richardson
DSDavid Sheffield
David Sheffield
FCFiona J. Clarke
Fiona J. Clarke
PBPaul Brindley
Paul Brindley
In an increasingly urbanised world where mental health is currently in crisis, interventions to increase human engagement and connection with the natural environment are one of the fastest growing, most widely accessible, and cost-effective ways of improving human wellbeing. This study aimed to provide an evaluation of a smartphone app-based wellbeing intervention. In a randomised controlled trial study design, the app prompted 582 adults, including a subgroup of adults classified by baseline scores on the Recovering Quality of Life scale as having a common mental health problem (n = 148), to notice the good things about urban nature (intervention condition) or built spaces (active control). There were statistically significant and sustained improvements in wellbeing at one-month follow-up. Importantly, in the noticing urban nature condition, compared to a built space control, improvements in quality of life reached statistical significance for all adults and clinical significance for those classified as having a mental health difficulty. This improvement in wellbeing was partly explained by significant increases in nature connectedness and positive affect. This study provides the first controlled experimental evidence that noticing the good things about urban nature has strong clinical potential as a wellbeing intervention and social prescription.

1 October 2010 in Personality and Individual Differences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FCFiona J. Clarke
Fiona J. Clarke
EAElizabeth J. Austin
Elizabeth J. Austin

28 January 2021 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KMKirsten McEwan
Kirsten McEwan
Dave GilesDave Giles
Dave Giles
FCFiona J. Clarke
Fiona J. Clarke
Yasuhiro KoteraYasuhiro Kotera
Yasuhiro Kotera
GEGary Evans
Gary Evans
DWDominic Weil
Dominic Weil
Forest Bathing, where individuals use mindfulness to engage with nature, has been reported to increase heart rate variability and benefit wellbeing. To date, most Forest Bathing studies have been conducted in Asia. Accordingly, this paper reports the first pragmatic controlled trial of Forest Bathing in the United Kingdom, comparing Forest Bathing with a control comprising an established wellbeing intervention also known to increase heart rate variability called Compassionate Mind Training. Sixty-one university staff and students (50 females, 11 males) were allocated to (i) Forest Bathing, (ii) Compassionate Mind Training or (iii) Forest Bathing combined with Compassionate Mind Training. Wellbeing and heart rate variability were measured at baseline, post-intervention and three-months follow-up. There were improvements in positive emotions, mood disturbance, rumination, nature connection and compassion and 57% of participants showed an increase in heart rate variability. There were no significant differences between conditions, showing that Forest Bathing had equivalence with an established wellbeing intervention. The findings will help healthcare providers and policy makers to understand the effects of Forest Bathing and implement it as a feasible social prescription to improve wellbeing. Future research needs to involve clinical populations and to assess the effects of Forest Bathing in a fully powered randomised controlled trial.

1 February 2020 in Landscape and Urban Planning
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KMKirsten McEwan
Kirsten McEwan
FCFiona J. Clarke
Fiona J. Clarke
MRMiles Richardson
Miles Richardson
RCRoss Cameron
Ross Cameron

15 June 2021 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FCFiona J. Clarke
Fiona J. Clarke
Yasuhiro KoteraYasuhiro Kotera
Yasuhiro Kotera
KMKirsten McEwan
Kirsten McEwan
The boundary between mindfulness and forest bathing, two conceptually related therapies, is unclear. Accordingly, this study reports the strengths and challenges, similarities and differences, and barriers and facilitators for both. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with seven trained and experienced practitioners of both mindfulness and forest bathing. Reflexive thematic analysis revealed four main themes: (i) differences between the approaches; (ii) the benefits of forest bathing; (iii) biophilia through forest bathing; and (iv) inward versus outward attentional focus as a distinction between the approaches. Both practices were found to benefit well-being, but practitioners revealed key barriers to mindfulness. For vulnerable groups experiencing mental health challenges or difficulties achieving a meditative state, mindfulness may introduce well-being risks. By offering a gentler, more intuitive approach that encourages outward attentional focus, forest bathing was found to overcome this barrier. Forest bathing is suitable for all groups, but adaptations are recommended for those expressing fear or discomfort in forested environments. The findings inform how to position both approaches in practice, as a first step towards social prescribing recommendations. Wider implications concern forest bathing’s potential to impact environmental well-being. Future research must garner comparative data, involve young people, and explore the feasibility of a forest bathing social prescription.

1 September 2020 in The Humanistic Psychologist
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMiles Richardson
Miles Richardson
ERElizabeth Richardson
Elizabeth Richardson
JHJenny Hallam
Jenny Hallam
FCFiona J. Clarke
Fiona J. Clarke