Geraldo Neto

Prof. Dr. Geraldo Neto

International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne´s University Hospital, Brno, Jihomoravský Kraj, Czech Republic
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2017 in Neuroscience Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ELEduardo Lattari
Eduardo Lattari
SCSamara Sezana Costa
Samara Sezana Costa
CCCarlos Campos
Carlos Campos
AOAldair José de Oliveira
Aldair José de Oliveira
SMSergio Machado
Sergio Machado
GNGeraldo Neto
Geraldo Neto

1 January 2020 in Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ELEduardo Lattari
Eduardo Lattari
CCCarlos Campos
Carlos Campos
MLMurilo Khede Lamego
Murilo Khede Lamego
SLSandro Legey
Sandro Legey
GNGeraldo Neto
Geraldo Neto
SMSérgio Machado
Sérgio Machado
Lattari, E, Campos, C, Lamego, MK, Legey, S, Neto, GM, Rocha, NB, Oliveira, AJ, Carpenter, CS, and Machado, S. Can transcranial direct current stimulation improve muscle power in individuals with advanced weight-training experience? J Strength Cond Res 34(1): 97–103, 2020—The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on countermovement jump (CMJ) performance in men with advanced strength-training experience. Ten healthy male subjects with advanced strength training and squatting exercise experience were included. Participants took part in an initial visit to the laboratory to complete anthropometric measurements and CMJ kinematic test-retest reliability. Participants then completed 3 experimental conditions, 48–72 hours apart, in a randomized, double-blinded crossover design: anodal, cathodal, and sham-tDCS (2 mA for 20 minutes targeting the motor cortex bilaterally). Participants completed 3 CMJ tests before and after each experimental condition, with 1-minute recovery interval between each test. The best CMJ in each moment was selected for analysis. Two-way (condition by moment) repeated measures analysis of variance was performed for CMJ height, flight time (FT), and muscular peak power (PP). Effect sizes and interindividual variability of tDCS responses were also analyzed. There was a significant condition by moment interaction for all outcome measures, with a large prepost increase in CMJ height, FT, and PP in the anodal condition. All the participants displayed CMJ performance improvements after the anodal condition. There were no significant differences in both cathodal and sham conditions. Anodal tDCS may be a valuable tool to enhance muscle power–related tasks performance, which is extremely relevant for sports that require vertical jumping ability. Anodal tDCS may also be used to support strength training, enhancing its effects on performance-oriented outcome measures.

1 December 2016 in Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ELEduardo Lattari
Eduardo Lattari
MAMaria L. Andrade
Maria L. Andrade
Alberto Souza Sá FilhoAlberto Souza Sá Filho
Alberto Souza Sá Filho
AMAntônio M. Moura
Antônio M. Moura
GNGeraldo Neto
Geraldo Neto
SMSérgio Machado
Sérgio Machado
Lattari, E, Andrade, ML, Filho, AS, Moura, AM, Neto, GM, Silva, JG, Rocha, NB, Yuan, T-F, Arias-Carrión, O, and Machado, S. Can transcranial direct current stimulation improve the resistance strength and decrease the rating perceived scale in recreational weight-training experience? J Strength Cond Res 30(12): 3381–3387, 2016—The goal of this study was to evaluate the acute efficacy of anodic transcranial direct current stimulation on the total volume of repetitions and perceived exertion in recreationally trained individuals in strength. The sample consisted of 10 participants trained in exercise against resistance for at least 3 months. Participants underwent elbow flexion exercise at barbell with a specific load of 10 repetition maximum (10RM), responded immediately after the OMNI-RES scale, and were stimulated for 20 minutes with a tDSC protocol (2 mA), depending on randomization. After applying the tDSC, subjects were again subjected to perform elbow flexion with 10RM load and, soon after, again responded to OMNI-RES scale. All subjects underwent the 3 experimental conditions of the study, c-tDSC, a-tDSC, and sham-tDSC, which were randomized. A range of 48–72 hours was allowed between each assessment visit. An interaction to condition and time (F = 52.395; p ≤ 0.001) has shown that repetitions completed after anodic condition were higher compared with the other conditions in the postsession. In relation to perceived exertion, verified by OMNI-RES scale, 2-way analysis of variance for repeated measures showed an interaction between condition and time (F = 28.445; p ≤ 0.001), where the perceived exertion was decreased after the a-tDSC condition and increased after the c-tDSC condition. In strict terms of performance, it seems to be beneficial to attend a session of 20 minutes a-tDSC, when strength training practitioners can no longer support high-volume training and have increased responses in the perceived exertion.

1 January 2018 in Neuroscience Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ELEduardo Lattari
Eduardo Lattari
BOBruno Soares de Oliveira
Bruno Soares de Oliveira
BOBruno Oliveira
Bruno Oliveira
Rodrigo Cunha de Mello PedreiroRodrigo Cunha de Mello Pedreiro
Rodrigo Cunha de Mello Pedreiro
SMSergio Machado
Sergio Machado
GNGeraldo Neto
Geraldo Neto

26 December 2018 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ELEduardo Lattari
Eduardo Lattari
BOBruno Oliveira
Bruno Oliveira
RMRenato Sobral Monteiro-Junior
Renato Sobral Monteiro-Junior
Silvio Rodrigues Marques-NetoSilvio Rodrigues Marques-Neto
Silvio Rodrigues Marques-Neto
AOAldair J Oliveira
Aldair J Oliveira
HBHenning Budde
Henning Budde
Previous studies investigating the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on muscle strength showed no consensus. Therefore, the purpose of this article was to systematically review the literature on the effects of single dose tDCS to improve muscle strength. A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMeb, ISI Web of Science, SciELO, and Scopus using search terms regarding tDCS and muscle strength. Studies were included in accordance with Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Setting (PICOS) including criteria. Healthy men and women, strength training practitioners or sedentary were selected. The acute effects of single dose anode stimulus of tDCS (a-tDCS) and the placebo stimulus of tDCS (sham) or no interventions were considered as an intervention and comparators, respectively. Measures related to muscle strength were analyzed. To conduct the analyses a weighted mean difference (WMD) and the standardized mean difference (SMD) were applied as appropriate. A total of 15 studies were included in this systematic review and 14 in meta-analysis. Regarding the maximal isometric voluntary contraction (MIVC), a small effect was seen between tDCS and Sham with significant difference between the conditions (SMD = 0.29; CI95% = 0.05 to 0.54; Z = 2.36; p = 0.02). The muscular endurance measured by the seconds sustaining a percentage of MIVC demonstrated a large effect between tDCS and Sham (WMD = 43.66; CI95% = 29.76 to 57.55; Z = 6.16; p < 0.001), showing an improvement in muscular endurance after exposure to tDCS. However, muscular endurance based on total work showed a trivial effect between tDCS and Sham with no significant difference (SMD = 0.22; CI95% = -0.11 to 0.54; Z = 1.32, p = 0.19). This study suggests that the use of tDCS may promote increase in maximal voluntary contraction and muscular endurance through isometric contractions.

1 January 2020 in Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ELEduardo Lattari
Eduardo Lattari
BFBlair José Rosa Filho
Blair José Rosa Filho
SJSidnei Jorge Fonseca Junior
Sidnei Jorge Fonseca Junior
EMEric Murillo-Rodriguez
Eric Murillo-Rodriguez
NBNuno Barbosa-Rocha
Nuno Barbosa-Rocha
GNGeraldo Neto
Geraldo Neto
Lattari, E, Rosa Filho, BJ, Fonseca Junior, SJ, Murillo-Rodriguez, E, Rocha, N, Machado, S, and Maranhão Neto, GA. Effects on volume load and ratings of perceived exertion in individuals' advanced weight training after transcranial direct current stimulation. J Strength Cond Res 34(1): 89–96, 2020—The aim of this study was investigate the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on volume load and ratings of perceived exertion. Fifteen young healthy individuals, aged between 20 and 30 years in advanced strength training were recruited. Test and retest of the 10 maximum repetitions (10RM) were performed to determine the reliability of load used. Subjects performed 3 experimental conditions in a randomized, double-blinded crossover design: anodic stimulation (a-tDCS), cathodic stimulation (c-tDCS), and sham (2 mA for 20 minutes targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex left). Immediately after the experimental conditions, subjects completed 1 set of maximum repetitions with 10RM load (volume load) and answered to OMNI-RES (poststimulation) (level of significance p ≤ 0.05). The volume load showed main effect for condition (F (2, 28) = 164.801; p < 0.001). In poststimulation, a-tDCS was greater than c-tDCS (p ≤ 0.001) and sham (p ≤ 0.001). For ratings of perceived exertion (OMNI-RES), the results showed main effect for condition (F (2, 28) = 9.768; p ≤ 0.05). In poststimulation, c-tDCS was greater than a-tDCS (p ≤ 0.05) and sham (p ≤ 0.05). We conclude that the use of a-tDCS may promote increase in volume load for the LP45 exercise. Moreover, higher volume loads are necessary to maximize muscle strength and anabolism.