Giovanni Di Bonaventura

Prof. Giovanni Di Bonaventura

Medical, Oral, and Biotechnological Sciences, G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 August 2007 in APMIS
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSSrdjan Stepanović
Srdjan Stepanović
DVDragana Miroslav Vukovic
Dragana Miroslav Vukovic
VHVeronika Hola
Veronika Hola
Giovanni Di BonaventuraGiovanni Di Bonaventura
Giovanni Di Bonaventura
SDSlobodanka Djukić
Slobodanka Djukić
FRFilip Ruzicka
Filip Ruzicka

8 November 2016 in Critical Reviews in Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JAJoana Azeredo
Joana Azeredo
Nuno AzevedoNuno Azevedo
Nuno Azevedo
Romain BriandetRomain Briandet
Romain Briandet
NCNuno Cerca
Nuno Cerca
TCTom Coenye
Tom Coenye
CSClaus Sternberg
Claus Sternberg
Biofilms are widespread in nature and constitute an important strategy implemented by microorganisms to survive in sometimes harsh environmental conditions. They can be beneficial or have a negative impact particularly when formed in industrial settings or on medical devices. As such, research into the formation and elimination of biofilms is important for many disciplines. Several new methodologies have been recently developed for, or adapted to, biofilm studies that have contributed to deeper knowledge on biofilm physiology, structure and composition. In this review, traditional and cutting-edge methods to study biofilm biomass, viability, structure, composition and physiology are addressed. Moreover, as there is a lack of consensus among the diversity of techniques used to grow and study biofilms. This review intends to remedy this, by giving a critical perspective, highlighting the advantages and limitations of several methods. Accordingly, this review aims at helping scientists in finding the most appropriate and up-to-date methods to study their biofilms.

9 January 2008 in Journal of Applied Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Giovanni Di BonaventuraGiovanni Di Bonaventura
Giovanni Di Bonaventura
RPR. Piccolomini
R. Piccolomini
DPD. Paludi
D. Paludi
VDV. D’oRio
V. D’oRio
AVA. Vergara
A. Vergara
AIA. Ianieri
A. Ianieri
Aims: To assess the ability of Listeria monocytogenes to form biofilm on different food-contact surfaces with regard to different temperatures, cellular hydrophobicity and motility. Methods and Results: Forty-four L. monocytogenes strains from food and food environment were tested for biofilm formation by crystal violet staining. Biofilm levels were significantly higher on glass at 4, 12 and 22°C, as compared with polystyrene and stainless steel. At 37°C, L. monocytogenes produced biofilm at significantly higher levels on glass and stainless steel, as compared with polystyrene. Hydrophobicity was significantly (P < 0·05) higher at 37°C than at 4, 12 and 22°C. Thirty (68·2%) of 44 strains tested showed swimming at 22°C and 4 (9·1%) of those were also motile at 12°C. No correlation was observed between swimming and biofilm production. Conclusions: L. monocytogenes can adhere to and form biofilms on food-processing surfaces. Biofilm formation is significantly influenced by temperature, probably modifying cell surface hydrophobicity. Significance and Impacts of the Study: Biofilm formation creates major problems in the food industry because it may represent an important source of food contamination. Our results are therefore important in finding ways to prevent contamination because they contribute to a better understanding on how L. monocytogenes can establish biofilms in food industry and therefore survive in the processing environment.

1 October 2008 in FEMS Microbiology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
APArianna Pompilio
Arianna Pompilio
RPRaffaele Piccolomini
Raffaele Piccolomini
CPCarla Picciani
Carla Picciani
DDDomenico D'Antonio
Domenico D'Antonio
VSVincenzo Savini
Vincenzo Savini
Giovanni Di BonaventuraGiovanni Di Bonaventura
Giovanni Di Bonaventura
We tested 40 clinical Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strains to investigate the possible correlation between adherence to and formation of biofilm on p

1 October 2006 in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Giovanni Di BonaventuraGiovanni Di Bonaventura
Giovanni Di Bonaventura
APArianna Pompilio
Arianna Pompilio
CPCarla Picciani
Carla Picciani
MIManuela Iezzi
Manuela Iezzi
DDDomenico D'ANtonio
Domenico D'ANtonio
RPRaffaele Piccolomini
Raffaele Piccolomini
Trichosporon asahii is the most common cause of fatal disseminated trichosporonosis, frequently associated with indwelling medical devices. Despite the use of antifungal drugs to treat trichosporonosis, infection is often persistent and is associated with high mortality. This drove our interest in evaluating the capability of T. asahii to form a biofilm on biomaterial-representative polystyrene surfaces through the development and optimization of a reproducible T. asahii -associated biofilm model. Time course analyses of viable counts and a formazan salt reduction assay, as well as microscopy studies, revealed that biofilm formation by T. asahii occurred in an organized fashion through four distinct developmental phases: initial adherence of yeast cells (0 to 2 h), germination and microcolony formation (2 to 4 h), filamentation (4 to 6 h), and proliferation and maturation (24 to 72 h). Scanning electron microscopy and confocal scanning laser microscopy revealed that mature T. asahii biofilms (72-h) displayed a complex, heterogeneous three-dimensional structure, consisting of a dense network of metabolically active yeast cells and hyphal elements completely embedded within exopolymeric material. Antifungal susceptibility testing demonstrated a remarkable rise in the MICs of sessile T. asahii cells against clinically used amphotericin B, caspofungin, voriconazole, and fluconazole compared to their planktonic counterparts. In particular, T. asahii biofilms were up to 16,000 times more resistant to voriconazole, the most active agent against planktonic cells (MIC, 0.06 μg/ml). Our results suggest that the ability of T. asahii to form a biofilm may be a major factor in determining persistence of the infection in spite of in vitro susceptibility of clinical isolates.

14 December 2021 in Pathogens
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Giovanni Di BonaventuraGiovanni Di Bonaventura
Giovanni Di Bonaventura
SASilvia Angeletti
Silvia Angeletti
AIAndrea Ianni
Andrea Ianni
TPTommasangelo Petitti
Tommasangelo Petitti
Giovanni GherardiGiovanni Gherardi
Giovanni Gherardi
Brucella spp. are Gram-negative, non-motile, non-spore-forming, slow-growing, facultative intracellular bacteria causing brucellosis. Brucellosis is an endemic of specific geographic areas and, although underreported, represents the most common zoonotic infection, with an annual global incidence of 500,000 cases among humans. Humans represent an occasional host where the infection is mainly caused by B. melitensis, which is the most virulent; B. abortus; B. suis; and B. canis. A microbiological analysis is crucial to identifying human cases because clinical symptoms of human brucellosis are variable and aspecific. The laboratory diagnosis is based on three different microbiological approaches: (i) direct diagnosis by culture, (ii) indirect diagnosis by serological tests, and (iii) direct rapid diagnosis by molecular PCR-based methods. Despite the established experience with serological tests and highly sensitive nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs), a culture is still considered the “gold standard” in the laboratory diagnosis of brucellosis due to its clinical and epidemiological relevance. Moreover, the automated BC systems now available have increased the sensitivity of BCs and shortened the time to detection of Brucella species. The main limitations of serological tests are the lack of common interpretative criteria, the suboptimal specificity due to interspecies cross-reactivity, and the low sensitivity during the early stage of disease. Despite that, serological tests remain the main diagnostic tool, especially in endemic areas because they are inexpensive, user friendly, and have high negative predictive value. Promising serological tests based on new synthetic antigens have been recently developed together with novel point-of-care tests without the need for dedicated equipment and expertise. NAATs are rapid tests that can help diagnose brucellosis in a few hours with high sensitivity and specificity. Nevertheless, the interpretation of NAAT-positive results requires attention because it may not necessarily indicate an active infection but rather a low bacterial inoculum, DNA from dead bacteria, or a patient that has recovered. Refined NAATs should be developed, and their performances should be compared with those of commercial and home-made molecular tests before being commercialized for the diagnosis of brucellosis. Here, we review and report the most common and updated microbiological diagnostic methods currently available for the laboratory diagnosis of brucellosis.